How Much Exercise Do You REALLY Need to Lose Weight?

3.3KSHARES

By: , SparkPeople Blogger
  :  1415 comments   :  1,544,123 Views

It's not exactly earth-shattering news that exercise is essential for shedding pounds. Along with proper nutrition and a calorie-moderated diet, regular activity is a critical piece of the weight-loss equation—but how much? If you feel like the gym has become your second home, or if you're spending more hours walking, running or doing fitness videos than hanging out with your family, you might be overdoing it. Conversely, if your daily exercise consists of a 15-minute stroll around the block, you might need to ramp up your efforts to see real results.
 
Fortunately, the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) has provided some scientific guidance so you don't have to rely on guesswork.
 

Exercise Guidelines for Overall Health

 
In 2011, the ACSM released some general recommendations for how much exercise is needed to reap overall health and cardiovascular benefits. According to these guidelines, adults should engage in at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity exercise per week. Broken down to 20 minutes per day, that might not sound like much—and for obese adults who are trying to lose weight, it may not be enough.
 
Take care to focus on the types of exercise you're doing in addition to the quantity. The ACSM recommends a diversified routine that includes the following four disciplines:
  1. Cardio Exercise: Adults should get at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity exercise per week, which can be 30 to 60 minutes of moderate-intensity exercise five days per week or 20 to 60 minutes of vigorous-intensity exercise three days per week. These can also be split into shorter, more frequent segments. Check out our 110 cardio ideas.
  2. Resistance Exercise: This includes strength training of major muscle groups two or three days each week, using either hand weights, resistance bands, weight machines or other equipment. Try to complete two to four sets of each exercise, starting with eight to 12 reps, then 10 to 15, and finally 15 to 20 to improve muscular endurance.
  3. Flexibility Exercise: It's recommended to perform stretching or yoga two or three days per week to improve range of motion. Hold each stretch for 10 to 30 seconds, then repeat two to four times.
  4. Functional Fitness Training: Two to three days per week, for 20 to 30 minutes per day, adults should engage in exercises that work their motor skills, such as balance, coordination and agility. This is especially important to prevent falls and increase mobility for older adults.

Exercise Guidelines for Weight Loss

If you're trying to lose weight, you most likely need more than the general recommended amount of 150 weekly minutes of exercise—but how much more? The ACSM released updated guidelines for weight loss and prevention of weight regain. For overweight and obese individuals, 250+ minutes per week of moderate-intensity physical activity will be more effective in reducing weight and keeping it off. Strength training is also highly recommended to increase fat-burning muscle and improve overall health.


What do you think? Does 50 minutes of exercise, five days a week seem like a lot to you, or is that in line with what you're already doing? What amount of daily exercise has given you the best results?


Click here to to redeem your SparkPoints
  You will earn 5 SparkPoints
 
Got a story idea? Give us a shout!
3.3KSHARES
NEXT ENTRY >   10 Futuristic Health Products That Should Be on Your Radar

Comments

  • 1365
    I exercise somewhere between 350-500 minutes most weeks, including 15-25 miles of runs and 10-15 miles of walks, and I still cannot lost weight unless I really control my food. I lost 48 pounds last year, with even more running that's I'm currently able (due to an injury) but got off track a little with the food, and gained back about 8 pounds. Now those 8 pound seem stuck to me with gorilla glue (if you know what that is, you know how hard it is to get these pounds off). I'll tell you, if I stopped exercising, or reduced to only 150 minutes per week, I'd blow up like a balloon. - 5/4/2017   9:49:39 AM
  • 1364
    My goal is 300 minutes/week, combination of cardio and ST, and I make it exceed it 90% of the time. - 5/4/2017   9:23:02 AM
  • 1363
    I know for me, I almost never lose much because of diet. It's always exercise. But I've had exercise bulimia since high school. So what would I know? - 5/4/2017   9:13:56 AM
  • CHERYLHURT
    1362
    Never quit! - 5/4/2017   7:33:28 AM
  • RO2BENT
    1361
    Keep moving forward - 5/4/2017   7:03:18 AM
  • 1360
    I di 240 minutes three days a week, then moderately on other days. I am disabled and 64. I need more exercise. - 5/4/2017   6:50:51 AM
  • 1359
    I've lost 45 lbs without exercising and still losing. I started at 303 could barley move. Changing my eating habits was the only option I had. Now I can move much better but still very over weight I've just now started walking alittle more. Not much maybe a half mile a couple times a week. But I'm still losing weight. It can be done without exercising. So don't get discouraged thinking you have to workout. Just do what you can. No matter on your size you can focus on and control what you eat. So, big thumbs down 👎 for this article. BTW Yes I know exercising is good for your heart and overall health. Some people can't for different reasons and you have to start somewhere and it can be done. - 5/4/2017   5:59:44 AM
  • 1358
    For the past 9 weeks I have averaged 250+ minutes of exercise per week. Prior to that I was injured and was nowhere near that amount of exercise and managed to maintain my weight loss despite an inability to move much. I simply reduced my nutritional intake given there was no longer a need to fuel the activity and did just fine. My experience seems to indicate that nutrition is a far more important factor when it comes to weight loss and weight maintenance than physical activity. Physical activity is good for other reasons; but, is not the primary driver of weight loss. - 5/4/2017   12:39:10 AM
  • 1357
    Functional fitness, who knew? I need to look into this more! - 5/3/2017   11:45:53 PM
  • 1356
    Thanks - 5/3/2017   4:07:43 PM
  • AMYROSEC
    1355
    Thank you - 5/3/2017   3:46:16 PM
  • 1354
    Thank you - 5/3/2017   11:07:23 AM
  • 1353
    Thanks for a great article! :) - 5/3/2017   9:20:46 AM
  • 1352
    Great article! - 5/3/2017   8:22:00 AM
  • 1351
    I always wonder this...thanks for posting! - 5/3/2017   7:38:17 AM
  • DMEYER4
    1350
    thank you for this article lots of helpful info - 5/3/2017   6:08:38 AM
  • 1349
    This was a very informative article!!! - 5/3/2017   3:20:01 AM
  • 1348
    I know I do enough cardio, but I don't get in enough strength training. I'll have to work on it. - 5/2/2017   8:47:16 AM
  • 1347
    I have to do at least 60 minutes of cardio 5 or 6 days a week in order to lose weight and eat a low calorie diet. On a normal day I do 1-2 hours of cardio, 30 minutes of Yoga and 30 minutes of strength training. - 4/10/2017   9:16:39 PM
  • 1346
    I don't think 50 mins/5 days a week or 250 mins to be too much. At my gym-going peak, I spent about 470 mins at the gym over 6 days per week. As a testament that how much you work out is not the most important thing, I was still stuck at 210 lbs. Now I spend 250-300 mins/week at the gym and 1 day high activity outdoors. My last weight check is just under 155 lbs. Turns out food matters more than the time you log working out. Working out has it's place, but there has to be other balances in life! - 3/9/2017   12:47:44 PM
  • 1345
    I know it seems daunting and impossible with time constraints but that's about what I'm doing now. - 3/3/2017   1:11:43 AM
  • 1344
    That does seem a bit daunting. I agree with those who said that this advice could turn off someone who is just starting out. All things in moderation seems to be the key. I shoot for 30 minutes a day, every day, but often count things like yard work, shoveling snow and vacuuming just to fit it all into one day.

    If a person has the time for that level of activity, more power to them but I would hate to see someone discouraged by advice like this. - 11/11/2016   9:57:40 PM
  • 1343
    The guidelines shared in this article have been evidenced in my experience. During my weight loss phase I was putting in the time necessary to cover 35 miles on average per week. This was 35 miles of walking, hiking, running that was in ADDITION to my routine activity. Steps from walking about during the day are not included in this 35 miles.

    That being said, my experience has also taught me that one cannot out exercise ones fork. Meaning exercise is not an excuse to eat more. Many times I've seen it mentioned that weight loss is 80% nutrition and 20% exercise. I have to agree. What one choses to put into their mouth has a far greater impact on weight loss than exercise will ever have. Ones nutritional intake cannot be ignored. - 11/11/2016   5:12:30 PM
  • 1342
    I think 50 minutes a day, five days a week is quite a bit unless it counts walking as part of that. Between my regular exercise that I do and walking I tend to get between 60-100 minutes per day but that includes the time I spend walking around at work (work at a large spread out company) and walking my dogs. So it will average between 60-100 minutes during the day rather than one or two focused sessions. I agree with a lot of the other comments that what you eat is likely pays even a larger role. - 11/11/2016   4:53:10 PM
  • CRAZYCOUTER
    1341
    I exercise 60 min 6 days a week. I feel good when I exercise, but the exercise does not seem to help me lose weight. Neither is eating low calorie or low fat. What I have found that works for me is eating between 1800 and 2500 calories a day of whole food. No food additives or processed foods. I don't eat soy and the wheat I eat once in awhile is whole wheat. When I eat food additives and processed food my weight goes straight back up, even at 1200 to 1400 calories a day. I'm down 41 lbs with 85 more to go. Yeahhhhh - 11/11/2016   4:15:08 PM
  • 1340
    I do at least 150 minutes per day & it's finally starting to pay off. I lost 2.8 lbs.
    since last Friday! I hope everyone has a Fun-Filled & Blessed Friday! Happy
    Veterans Day! Linda! - 11/11/2016   3:03:02 PM
  • 1339
    I do at least 65 minutes per day, every day. Get up everyday very early and go to the gym before work. Work very long hours 10-12 hours per day. 45 minute commute one way to work. I have found that if you want it bad enough, you find the time. But I also agree that losing the weight is mostly about eating less calories than you burn. - 11/11/2016   2:26:26 PM
  • AMY57RUTH
    1338
    I agree, who has time to do 50 minutes of exercise every day! working full time, with kids and committee obligations.... - 11/11/2016   2:15:02 PM
  • 1337
    Who has time for that? Life is so busy I'm lucky to get 30 mins in... - 11/11/2016   1:34:57 PM
  • 1336
    It reminds me of Col. Cathcart in the novel "Catch-22," who was continually raising the number of bombing missions his men had to fly, without regard to what it did to morale. God bless the ACSM, always giving us new and exciting ways to fail. - 11/11/2016   10:22:07 AM
  • 1335
    As I got into exercise more late last winter and into the spring, I found that I was often exercising 50 -60 minutes a day especially on days when I also included strength training. Exercising 300 minutes a week has been a goal for some time and it DOES work. Since early January I have lost over 46 pounds and for me getting lots of exercise has been the key to losing that weight and helping me to continue to my final goal. - 11/11/2016   9:48:26 AM
  • CNBRIM
    1334
    The only time I go past 30 minutes of exercise is when I'm walking on a Sunday. Other than that I will not go past 30 minutes of exercise. - 11/11/2016   9:15:06 AM
  • 1333
    I think it is a LOT...and articles like this is why I don't really read articles on SP any more. One minute, you're telling us that 30 minutes is what we really need...then you're telling us that if we can just fit in 10 to 15 minutes, we'll be well on our way...now, it's 50 minutes or bust? This is why people get frustrated and this why people quit. I'll keep my own counsel on what's working for me and my weight loss journey, not fret over ever new "finding" in somebody's medical journal. - 11/11/2016   9:09:28 AM
  • 1332
    That seems SO daunting. 10 minutes was a great start and now I have worked my way up to 30 or 35 minutes of cardio 5 days a week. And THAT is doable. Just. I feel overwhelmed trying to figure out how to work full time, run errands, make dinner and fit 50 minutes of cardio into my days. I already get up at 5:30 every morning and it is pitch dark outside now at that time.
    I guess I will keep on keeping on, doing what I am doing and as long as it is working ( 20 pounds off in 2 & 1/2 months), that's what I will do. What I CAN do. - 11/11/2016   7:52:36 AM
  • 1331
    Always love SparkPeople member comments - and they are real. For me, exercise intensity makes a difference in my results. I have the option of going higher and being OK with that level (up to a point). For others, I agree with the saying: "Flat abs start in the kitchen". -- Your food / hydration choices are the biggest part of weight loss and maintenance. Always good to re-visit this topic. - 11/11/2016   5:39:12 AM
  • 1330
    As a single father with a full time job there is no freaking way I could fit 50 minutes of cardio in every day. Now that I am retired - it is easy. I am finally losing weight ha ha. But when the kids were home... forget it! Honestly I think a majority of my weight loss is by limiting my calorie intake, not exercising, though. - 11/11/2016   4:57:58 AM
  • 1329
    I just recently got a workup with a Bariatric Doctor for my lack of progress with my weight loss. My Metabolism is slower than average, not an uncommon thing for people with long term weight issues, and I am not doing enough cardio exercise (average 170 minutes a week). I am supposed to do 60 minutes of moderate to vigorous exercise 5 times a week. I basically ride my bike to and from work and the transit center to equal 60 minutes, plus an hour long brisk walk on the days I don't take my bike, or don't work. I am starting to see results. - 11/11/2016   3:23:09 AM
  • 1328
    I agree with many folks here.

    1. This is an old article (although I recently saw research that backed up its claim).

    2. Weight loss is mostly about diet. Exercise is great, but diet is the key. SO, without seeing what the people in the study were eating, the article seems incomplete.

    3. I know for me it's true that without a LOT of exercise, my weight moves downward very slowly.

    So...this article might be true for you...or it might not. - 10/3/2016   9:33:27 AM
  • DRXCREATURES
    1327
    I've exercised more than fours a week at times (sometime even much more so) and I still could not lose a pound. - 8/24/2016   2:25:46 AM
  • TACTAC20
    1326
    Why am I not receiving any more daily messages etc. on my email?
    tactac20@aol.com - 8/20/2016   4:49:01 PM
  • 1325
    The article didn't mention what kind of diets the people were on in the study. It also didn't mention the body types, gender or any health or hormonal issues the people in the study were / have. I think 250 minutes can be a lot. I shoot for an hour a day at least four times a week or more, but that is hard to find time for - and I don't have kids. I think your diet, plus the type of exercising you do is very important when it comes to weight loss, not just the amount of time. Not to mention, rest is important too. - 7/22/2016   3:35:49 PM
  • LDWADDLES
    1324
    I am a few months from 70, and I exercise 6 days a week. Sometimes I do 2 1 hour classes a day. And most days I walk a mile or two besides. I am overweight, in some of my classes other overweight people also take them. Don't say overweight people are lazy or inactive this may not be the case. Some of us have hormonal abnormalities that make it harder to take weight off.

    It is not right to be judged by looks. - 7/3/2016   10:15:58 PM
  • 1323
    We need to remember to check the dates on articles. This article is 3 years old. Information this old may be obsolete. It always goes back to calories consumed and calories burned. Exercise helps with weight loss but is not necessary. Check success stories on SP. There are those who have lost a large amount of weight and not exercised. Here is an example : http://www.sparkpeople.com/mypage.a
    sp?id=AUTIEJ
    - 7/3/2016   7:42:33 PM
  • 1322
    I don't know about that. I started with 20 minutes a day 7 days a week, which is 140 minutes a week, and did that for a good few months, then upped it to 30 minutes a day 7 days a week, which is 210 minutes a week. I went from 335 lbs. to 185 lbs. in 9 months. Of course, I was also on a very healthy diet. What I did worked for me. - 7/3/2016   7:03:21 PM
  • WI_MAINT_MAN
    1321
    I think it is better to rely on calorie deficit to loose weight, exercise is for fitness, yes you will also burn calories but exercise alone isn't enough. - 7/3/2016   7:00:17 PM
  • JUDYINALASKA
    1320
    I walk 10,000 steps a day watch what I eat and exercise 30 minutes a day and drink 90 ounces of water a day and I seem to be loosing weight. - 7/3/2016   6:54:46 PM
  • 1319
    For someone who might be struggling to balance a full time job,travelling to and from work, raise a family, look after the house, etc this could be the thing that will make them say forget it if they read it. And that is the problem with articles like this. It is very easy to say you need this, but unfortunately many people have to juggle so many things every day on top of trying to lose weight. They might see 50 minutes of cardio AND strength training and say forget it - there are not enough hours in the day to commit to that. And they give up before they start. I think articles like this do more to hinder weight loss than help it. I found way, way easier to work at losing weight and getting healthy once my kids were older, but trying to work full time, look after the home, raise small kids is hard and even harder if you have a long commute to get to and from work. Then add it picking kids up from daycare, getting dinner on the table, helping with homework and the list can go on and on. Many parents feel overwhelmed as it is and trying to find another hour + per day if you count the strength training part is very difficult. We need to find ways to encourage people to get healthy in a realistic way and not shut the process down with articles such as this. - 7/3/2016   6:46:56 PM
  • 1318
    The reason you should exercise is to be healthy, NOT to lose weight. We have our priorities all wrong. We should eat right and exercise because it's good for us and makes us feel better, that's it. Doing these things just to look "better" is a fools goal and will result in, well, no long lasting results. When I exercise regularly I feel better, when I eat healthy I feel better so I am trying to do both so I can keep up with my grandkids and live an active life. I will probably lose weight which will also make me feel better so it's a win, win! - 6/29/2016   8:21:21 PM
  • JANETEMILY
    1317
    It's simple.... exercise is great for improving your body and general health, energy, and well-being. But, exercise will not help you lose weight unless you modify your diet and calorie intake... Burning enough calories to lose weight without changing food intake is just not possible for most people. The old saying is true... "you can't outrun your fork." - 6/23/2016   4:26:34 AM
  • BRIMAR56
    1316
    I am proof that you do not need to exercise to lose weight. I dropped 25 pounds by counting calories; however, I definitely do believe you need to exercise as well as eat right to maintain the weight loss. I quit smoking and let myself go and gained 32 pounds. Exercise definitely gives you more leeway in being able to eat a tad more freely. - 6/17/2016   2:31:15 PM

Please Log In To Leave A Comment:    Log in now ›