Is Your Sunscreen Doing More Harm than Good?
For years, we've been told to slather on sunscreen every time we head outdoors so we can protect ourselves from skin cancer. But what we're not told is that sunscreens are not created equal: Some aren't as protective as they claim to be, while others contain potentially hazardous ingredients. That's the consensus of the Environmental Working Group. The nonprofit organization dedicated to protecting public health and the environment recently updated their Sunscreen Guide for 2010 to help consumers make better choices this summer and beyond.
EWG looked at more than 500 sunscreens on the market, tested them for potency, examined their ingredients, and reviewed the claims made on their packages. The result? A mere 39 out of 500 sunscreens examined meet their guidelines for consumer safety and sun protection.
"Many sunscreens available in the U.S. may be the equivalent of modern-day snake oil, plying customers with claims of broad-spectrum protection but not providing it, while exposing people to potentially hazardous chemicals that can penetrate the skin into the body," said Jane Houlihan, EWG Senior Vice President for Research. "When only 8 percent of sunscreens rate high for safety and efficacy, it's clear that consumers concerned about protecting themselves and their families are left with few good options."
What can we learn from this investigation?
EWG's full report is full of details, including the top ranked brands, a search tool to see how your sunscreen of choice stacks up, and a sunscreen hall of shame. Luckily, they also created a printable one-page guide that summarizes the most important facts you need to shop for a safe and effective sunscreen.
Here are a few of the facts that really caught my eye:
Are you surprised by these results? Will this report change how you shop for and use sunscreen?
EWG looked at more than 500 sunscreens on the market, tested them for potency, examined their ingredients, and reviewed the claims made on their packages. The result? A mere 39 out of 500 sunscreens examined meet their guidelines for consumer safety and sun protection.
"Many sunscreens available in the U.S. may be the equivalent of modern-day snake oil, plying customers with claims of broad-spectrum protection but not providing it, while exposing people to potentially hazardous chemicals that can penetrate the skin into the body," said Jane Houlihan, EWG Senior Vice President for Research. "When only 8 percent of sunscreens rate high for safety and efficacy, it's clear that consumers concerned about protecting themselves and their families are left with few good options."
What can we learn from this investigation?
EWG's full report is full of details, including the top ranked brands, a search tool to see how your sunscreen of choice stacks up, and a sunscreen hall of shame. Luckily, they also created a printable one-page guide that summarizes the most important facts you need to shop for a safe and effective sunscreen.
Here are a few of the facts that really caught my eye:
- A lower SPF is better. Anything higher than SPF 50 encourages consumers to stay out in the sun too long, and these numbers themselves may be misleading, according to the FDA. Stick with an SPF between 15 and 50.
- Vitamin A is not OK. Eating this vitamin is good, but applying it to your skin probably is not. 41% of sunscreens contain vitamin A, which is listed as "retinyl palmitate" on the ingredients label. Research shows that skin coated with this nutrient develops tumors and lesions sooner, so it's best avoided. I found that my current sunscreen ranked 5 out of 10 (1 is best and 10 is worst), which means to use caution with this particular product. I do plan to switch to one of the top-rated products listed on this report as soon as I use up my current bottle.
Are you surprised by these results? Will this report change how you shop for and use sunscreen?
![]() You will earn 3 SparkPoints |
NEXT ENTRY > 12 Delicious Ways to Use Strawberries























Comments
- 6/27/2010 2:18:26 PM
Science does NOT have all the answers. It is foolish to think that slathering chemicals all over is "safe". -- I have sensitive skin, so I develop an allergic reaction to many sunscreens I've tried. And, unfortunately, I sunburn fairly easily. It is something I wasn't particularly wise about in my younger years.
I'm glad that someone is finally making note of an area of concern (ie. chemicals) that my family has taken issue with regarding the validity of using and how to make good choices for our health. - 6/4/2010 4:38:12 AM
The only reason to do so would be because any product bought through Amazon from one of their links has their referrer tag in it so they can get a kick-back. They're looking out for ways to line their own pockets more than they are consumer interests. - 6/3/2010 7:00:28 PM
I like Coach Nicole's feedback on the link posted in #11. I agree that the source seems biased.
I usually boil in pants and long sleeves in the summer because I don't like the way I look in short clothing, but I appreciated this discussion about sunscreen! I read most of the comments, so thank you. - 6/3/2010 11:46:09 AM
-Note: The only reason I don't use it is because I am in the sun for no more than about 15mins at a time and no more than 30-45 total in a day. (That first 15 minutes is me soaking up my VitD) - 6/3/2010 11:40:05 AM
I do try to get out in the yard early or late in the day, wear hats. wrap-around sunglasses, garden gloves, etc. - 6/3/2010 12:56:39 AM
And yeah, I find the EWG suspect for other reasons than the sunscreen article. - 6/2/2010 4:44:36 PM
These reports always worry me that they will convince people to not wear sunscreen. I think it's important to put this in perspective. We know for a fact that sun exposure will significantly increase your risk of skin cancer. For the most part, the ingredients in these sunscreens that people are worried about we don't have definitive proof that they will cause cancer in the amount and delivery method used (being applied to the skin), so I think it's always safer to apply sunscreen, and if you can afford the nice organic ones all the better for you, but if not, it's still important to apply sunscreen.
I hope I don't sound preach-y, but my grandfather died from melanoma. - 6/2/2010 12:33:12 PM
- 6/2/2010 10:53:48 AM
My Neutrogena sunscreen ranked pretty low, but I don't have much of a choice, since I'm allergic to aloe, and aloe is in most (if not all) of the ones they recommend. :/
Still, I cover up as much as possible to avoid needing sunscreen too often. I really don't like the feel of sunscreen on my skin. - 6/2/2010 10:26:59 AM
I also read the link posted by Karen42Boys and find it to be quite biased, only consulting with an industry trade group: the Personal Care Products Council, which has an interest in preserving itself and all personal care products as safe and effective.
All in all, we should always do our own research and be wary of claims on both sides of an issue and then make our own decisions based on weighing the information. - 6/2/2010 10:16:41 AM
Really, you have to look at the source of the article. The EWG is not a scientific organization. They are lobbyists. The sunscreens that they recommend are ones that you buy using links from their page. Of course they are going to not recommend any thing else.
I will continue to use my Neutrogena sunscreens, since they work for me. I have sensitive skin, so I am picky about what I use. - 6/2/2010 9:46:08 AM
http://tinyurl.com/2f63xs2 - 6/2/2010 9:23:49 AM
Actually, I'm rather surprised it took anyone so long to study this product line. - 6/2/2010 9:14:42 AM
Please Log In To Leave A Comment: Log in now ›