Do P.E. Classes Really Matter?
As funding is cut and schools face pressure to meet more rigorous testing standards, physical education classes are often the first thing to go. Many argue that the lack of P.E. is one reason for the increasing rate of childhood obesity. But are P.E. classes as important as you'd think when it comes to the health of our children? A new study says no.
The study compared children (ages 7-11) from 3 schools in the U.K. The amount of time they spent in P.E. per week ranged from a high of 9.2 hours to a low of 1.7 hours. Researchers found that no matter how much P.E. they got during school hours, by the end of the day the children had moved around about the same amount, at the same intensity. (Children wore devices to measure their physical activity (and the intensity of that activity) all day for 4 weeks as part of the study.)
It seems that the kids who got a lot of activity during the school day tended to do less when they got home from school. And the kids who did not get much activity at school made up for it by being active at home- riding bikes, playing sports, etc. Despite how much activity they got, the children still varied widely in health factors like cholesterol- but mainly because of their diets, not activity level. According to researchers in this study, "Children have an activity "set point"- an energy-expenditure baseline to which, over time, they will naturally revert." So some kids just tend to be more active than others.
Another study, also from the U.K., found that boys who did less activity were just as healthy as those who did more. Those researchers concluded that children should be encouraged to go out and play, but not be forced into traditional P.E. programs. Both of these studies support the idea that nutrition, not physical activity, is more important when it comes to the health of our children.
When I was in school, P.E. introduced me to a wide variety of activities (like gymnastics, archery and lacrosse) that I would not have been exposed to otherwise. That encouraged me to find activities that I did enjoy, and pursue those as both a child and an adult. Regardless of what these studies say, I think P.E. should remain a standard part of a child's education. They should learn that activity can be fun, and establish habits early on that they can continue for the rest of their lives.
What do you think? Should P.E. be an important part of a school's curriculum? Do you agree with these studies that conclude diet, not physical activity, is most important when it comes to the health of our children?
The study compared children (ages 7-11) from 3 schools in the U.K. The amount of time they spent in P.E. per week ranged from a high of 9.2 hours to a low of 1.7 hours. Researchers found that no matter how much P.E. they got during school hours, by the end of the day the children had moved around about the same amount, at the same intensity. (Children wore devices to measure their physical activity (and the intensity of that activity) all day for 4 weeks as part of the study.)
It seems that the kids who got a lot of activity during the school day tended to do less when they got home from school. And the kids who did not get much activity at school made up for it by being active at home- riding bikes, playing sports, etc. Despite how much activity they got, the children still varied widely in health factors like cholesterol- but mainly because of their diets, not activity level. According to researchers in this study, "Children have an activity "set point"- an energy-expenditure baseline to which, over time, they will naturally revert." So some kids just tend to be more active than others.
Another study, also from the U.K., found that boys who did less activity were just as healthy as those who did more. Those researchers concluded that children should be encouraged to go out and play, but not be forced into traditional P.E. programs. Both of these studies support the idea that nutrition, not physical activity, is more important when it comes to the health of our children.
When I was in school, P.E. introduced me to a wide variety of activities (like gymnastics, archery and lacrosse) that I would not have been exposed to otherwise. That encouraged me to find activities that I did enjoy, and pursue those as both a child and an adult. Regardless of what these studies say, I think P.E. should remain a standard part of a child's education. They should learn that activity can be fun, and establish habits early on that they can continue for the rest of their lives.
What do you think? Should P.E. be an important part of a school's curriculum? Do you agree with these studies that conclude diet, not physical activity, is most important when it comes to the health of our children?
![]() You will earn 3 SparkPoints |
NEXT ENTRY > We Tried It: 'Yoga to the Rescue' Workout Cards







.jpg)


.jpg)











Comments
Today, kids don't really get out and play we used to. They'd rather watch television or play video games. I know the only exercise my son really got was in gym class and at recess (when they had it).
I agree with some of the other posters, at the very least, P. E. and/or recess allow children to burn off some energy that would otherwise be channeled in other...usually less desirable...activities. - 3/30/2012 8:26:11 AM
I did really enjoy recess when I was younger. I loved jumping rope, playing tetherball or 4-square, hopscotch. I also enjoyed bike riding and hiking when I was not in school. - 3/11/2012 12:57:50 AM
That said, I think getting rid of PE in schools is a HUGE mistake. Our kids need a little bit of enforced activity. Sometimes a little of what we don't like is good for us. But maybe there is a way of tiering the classes, so all the 'sporty-kids' can complete with each other and those who needs more assistance can get it without feeling like they are holding the rest of the class back? Thanks - 1/22/2012 2:28:59 AM
would make for older students is to give them choices-for example they could to work
out in the gym or do team sports. - 10/21/2011 6:14:59 AM
While I applaud the efforts of schools to force students into being more active, PE seems to be ineffective (at least in high school you are given the option of doing independent study PE to allow your sports to count for credit). - 8/30/2011 11:08:34 AM
Perhaps if P.E. actually taught fitness skills, especially to the less adept it would be beneficial. - 8/10/2011 5:25:06 AM
The P.E. classes my step son took did not do so. Personally, I think funding these classes is a terrible waste of taxpayer's funds.
It is up to the PARENTS not the school system to make sure their children develop healthy habits....including diet and exercise.
- 7/20/2011 11:22:42 AM
KEEP PE IN SCHOOLS!!! - 6/23/2011 9:57:41 PM
Furthermore, when I went to school from when I was 11- 13 we did a test each year on how many push ups, crunches, jumps, and back exercises you could do in a minute. When I couldn't do any push ups my teacher told me to go home and train push ups. A few months later I tried again at doing push ups in front of my teacher and that time I could do 25. Also, for those who were very unfit there was an extra day that you had to run sometimes to try and become fitter.
Finally, your brain gets quite tired class after class and it's very nice to have some time when you run around. It makes it easier to concentrate afterwards. - 6/22/2011 6:26:06 AM
I remember when I was in P.E.... we ran 3 miles every Friday.. and had to be less than 30 minutes... by years end we had to complete a 8 minute mile or we failed..trust me..we were more active than in math class.. and it helped us lose weight.. and a more informal setting for interaction.. I met my best friend in high school.. first day of gym class.. so it is important to keep gym.. just up the intensity!! - 3/8/2011 10:16:56 AM
Our schools need to serve the children healthy meals for those who are not bringing a lunch from home (and, breakfast for students who are eating breakfast at school too). While the cafeterias are offering healthy meal options, our kids will not choose them when there is pizza, chicken nuggets, french fries, etc are there. And, the healthy options are usually not the first ones our kids are seeing when they enter the cafeteria line.
Ultimately, healthy living starts at home. But, since our kids are spending a lot of their weekdays at school, they need to join forces with parents to support healthy living. How about having one day a week that pizza or whatever is offered and only having healthy options throughout the rest of the week???
I also feel that P.E. classes provide our children with exposure to various activities, help them develop team work and proper social skills, and provide them with education relating to their bodies and health. Keep it in the curriculum...and, if possible, provide it more often!!! - 2/2/2011 2:22:59 PM
I am glad I had PE
- 9/19/2010 6:06:11 PM
I was fortunate enough to be made to go to Catholic School (believe me, I wasn't thrilled when this happened in the first place. I went to public school 1st thru 5th, and then catholic for part of 5th till the end) and part of the reason why I say fortunate enough is because they didn't have these gigantic sports centers the public schools did. I did not have to worry about swimming in school because we had no pool. Also, my school did not require us to shower after gym class. Might sound gross to some people, but there's no one who really enjoys a communal shower while going thru puberty. I understand they were trying to teach personal hygiene, but I can't say anyone was lacking THAT much in that department. I know my public school friends were NOT happy about showering together. My high school separated the girls from the boys for gym class, too. I know I was thankful for that!
Granted, I didn't love PE, but I didn't hate it. We usually had fun and our teacher was pretty laid back. She'd let us choose some of the stuff we got to do - like strength training...or if we were doing aerobics, she'd be laughing along with us as we attempted to do the Paula Abdul aerobic workout (I am pretty sure Paula wore heels)... We played a game that was called "Pillow Polo" which we re-named "Tampon Ball" because the polo sticks looked like tampons. It was ridiculous amounts of fun and we loved playing it. I bet if we got told we couldn't call it Tampon Ball..that we would have not been as enthusiastic. Our teacher never, ever called it Tampon Ball, but got a good laugh out of the name change anyway. I think if you have a good teacher, PE can be great. If I had, had the gym teacher the boys had...I'd have a completely different opinion. That man was a former marine and was insane....The boys had to do all this crazy stuff that we did not. There was no fun in his gym class. The boys got yelled at and had to do extra if they didn't do enough. That is not how gym class should be.
- 9/19/2010 5:17:37 PM
Now, I see kids playing with parachutes, skipping, running to music - and teachers love to encourage everyone to have fun. I think it should absolutely be continued in our schools. There should be a huge focus on everyday fitness - and I think what our cafeterias serve needs to be addressed too!!!
It our schools that expose kids to different activties and ideas - for many kids, if they don't experience it at school they won't experience it at all. So, bring it on!! (But in a fun and positive way, of course!) - 7/21/2010 11:11:33 AM
However, children are not little troopers in boot camp, nor are they body builders and models who need to do intensive workouts. PE as a way to torture kids with interminably long runs, zillions of pushups, humiliations in the locker room, and their inability to climb a rope (how many of us do that as adults? Firefighters and military folks. The rest... not so much) should go by the way side. This side of PE is what seems to be the universal memory. I know I experienced it in two different school districts with four different gym teachers. Out of six gym teachers that I had while in school. That's 2/3rds. And the districts were half a state away from each other.
PE classes killed any desire I had to exercise or participate in sports until I was well into my twenties and hadn't seen the inside of a gym for a decade. I was always glad my high school only required one semester of gym to graduate, and that by the time I took it, we had a very cool gym teacher. Even so, it was not a favorite part of the day.
If schools want children to be more active, perhaps they should re-incorporate recess into their days. When I was in grade school, we had morning recess for 15 minutes, after lunch for 10-15 minutes, and afternoon recess for 15-20 minutes. We played games, jumped rope, and generally ran ourselves silly, and got some downtime from classwork.
When I went to middle school, recess was five or ten minutes on the patio outside after lunch, depending on how quickly you finished eating. By high school, bye-bye outdoors unless you were an outdoor-sports athlete or doing PE on the track. And PE couldn't make up for any of that because it simply was not as enjoyable as running willy-nilly around a playground. - 6/25/2010 4:45:21 PM
Please Log In To Leave A Comment: Log in now ›