Sweet-n-Low vs. Sugar

Tuesday, October 09, 2007

I tried an experiment this morning with my coffee...which is a must have for me. I usually use 2 sugars in each cup, which is 139 calories and 36 carbs. This morning i used 3 Sweet-n-Low packets instead of the sugar. It cut my calories down to 0 with 3 carbs. It definatly tasted different but for that many calories, i may be able to get used to it. I always hear bad things about artificial sweetners...any thoughts? Is it worth it?
Share This Post With Others
Member Comments About This Blog Post
    I know the South Beach Diet guy says that Splenda is preferable to other artificial sweeteners because it is a sugar product (sugar cane maybe?) & thus more "natural."

    Then there is the research suggesting that people who use a lot of artificially sweetened drinks tend to be heavier than those who don't. As I recall, researchers speculated that artificial sweeteners confuse your system & you end up craving more food. I'm going to check quickly & see if the SP site has any articles about this.

    This one is available on the Web & basically says sweeteners are OK for most people in moderation:

    Here's a very short SP article that says the same thing:

    Note that those are both addressing issues of basic health, not taking up the long-term question whether artificial sweeteners actually help people lose weight.

    It's an interesting topic--I still don't know what I think. :-)
    3846 days ago
    Well if it is bad for me then I am screwed because all I use is artificial sweetner--nutrasweet, sweet and low, splenda--you name it I use it--LOL. Seriously though, I think it is like anything else--in moderation it is fine.
    3846 days ago
  • Add Your Comment to the Blog Post

    Log in to post a comment

    Disclaimer: Weight loss results will vary from person to person. No individual result should be seen as a typical result of following the SparkPeople program.

More Blogs by MBR0830