Author: Sorting Last Post on Top Message:
FREEFROMFOOD Posts: 552
10/5/13 4:44 P

COACHDENISE - thanks so much.

SP_COACH_DENISE Posts: 42,484
10/5/13 2:46 P

It does seem to be a little off and I'll pass it onto our tech team to look into when they have a chance.

Thanks!

Coach Denise

MOTIVATED@LAST Posts: 15,457
10/5/13 6:44 A

The fitness maps function does produce some pretty weird results.

The fitness tracker itself seems to produce more consistent results.

M@L

FREEFROMFOOD Posts: 552
10/5/13 5:15 A

Hi
no I double checked that. You check and see.
It just doesn't make sense to me.
(although frankly I wouldn't mind if it was better for me to walk slower lol)
thanks

SLIMMERKIWI SparkPoints: (254,207)
Fitness Minutes: (41,561)
Posts: 27,166
10/5/13 4:42 A

I am wondering if you have done what I sometimes do..... misread the km/hr and mph. That might account for it!

Kris

FREEFROMFOOD Posts: 552
10/4/13 8:12 P

I use SP fitness tracker to log my exercise. But the following issue confuses me:
Walking 15 minutes at 4km/hr burns 101 calories
Walking 15 minutes at 4.6km/hr burns 99 calories

Why does walking faster and further burn fewer calories? Shouldn't it be the other way around?

Can someone enlighten me please?

Page: 1 of (1)  




Other Fitness and Exercise Topics:

Topics: Last Post:
Cold after exercise 1/27/2017 4:09:38 PM
Out of control 12/8/2016 7:06:19 PM
Totally changed exercise routing... 8/4/2016 1:11:39 PM
Having trouble getting started 7/4/2016 8:09:37 AM
Beta Thalassemia Minor and Exercise 3/27/2017 10:31:07 AM