@Mindhorizon, I agree that most people in the USA eat too many grains. I do not agree with all of your statements though. Especially ludicrous is your statement that most of the nutrition in grains is better supplied by meat! Actually, meat and grains have completely different nutritional profiles. Eating meat instead of grain is swapping out one form of junk food for another. You do realize that meat eaters have far higher rates of cancer, diabetes, and heart disease than vegetarians?! Phytic acid--- there are tips online about how to prepare whole grains traditionally that neutralize phytic acid. This may be worth looking into for those not willing to completely give up grains. As far as the paleo arguments about what our ancestors did / did not eat 10,000 years ago, it can easily be proven that most foods, including fruits and vegetables, are not of the same varietals as what was eaten long ago. It is not just grains! Meats are also drastically different with animals today receiving huge doses of antibiotics (contributing to antibiotic resistance in humans who consume them) and hormones to reach unnatural sizes + they are confined to tiny spaces and don't get the amount of exercise animals in the wild would get. Plus, animals eat all of these grains you are trying to avoid. Another point, 10,000 yrs ago, there was not one monolithic diet that everybody ate. What one ate depended greatly on location. Not everything is as cut-and-dried as proponents of certain diets want to make it sound. Bottom line: we all have different genetics and must experiment to see what foods we do best on. Elimination diets can help identify allergens we are sensitive too. I do better on fewer grains, but my husband can eat 6 donuts and a loaf of bread and maintain single digit body fat and a completely flat, hard stomach at age 53. He is on the low end of optimal BMI, just like in high school, and has categorically never needed to lose a single pound at any point in his life. Life is clearly not fair.
- 1/3/2014 11:37:24 AM