I would add that things are not always as black and white as we might like to think. I earned a living in a construction trade similar to what Ironworkers do, that involved a lot of climbing, crawling, and moving all kinds of weights, sizes, and shapes of things if every conceivable direction and position. We used rigging tools for much of it but those tools are heavy and hard to wrestle with too. Certain people had reputations as being very strong, as well as fast, coordinated, and so on. None of them that I remember had ever lifted weights or done any other kind of formal exercise. They were all farm boys, who grew up on a farm working hard all the time. I'm sure genetics is a factor, and a weight program would have made them even stronger. But hard work day in and day out can make you strong and keep you in good shape. Not everybody does that kind of work, but I just wanted to make the point that even if something is not technically defined as exercise it can still make you strong.
I think something can count as exercise if you only do it for a minute if it's so intense that it gets your heart beating really fast. If you do several sessions like that throughout the day it can be a valuable addition to a bigger exercise program.
If I spend a day working in my garden and by evening I'm so tired all I want to do is melt into my recliner and don't even feel like getting up to get a snack, I feel like I got some exercise, even though my heart rate might not have gone up. I guess now I should call it useful activity instead of exercise.
I remember years ago reading about exercise physiology, and one thing that sticks in my mind is what were called the three fundamental principles of exercise: overload, specificity, and reversibility. This article talked about the first and third. The second, specificity, is that training effect is specific to training stimulus: you get good at doing whatever it is you do in other words. I would add balance, like for example if you move weights in one direction you should also move weights in the opposite direction. And variety.
There have been a few times in my life when I was very active and did a lot of very intense exercise but still had a big belly and looked pregnant (but with good muscle tone), because I didn't exercise enough eating discipline.
4/21/2014 10:32:45 AM
what a delightful and motivating artricle, so if it doesnt matter anyway, might aswel all just vegetate on the couch and never indulge or enjoy life. wtf
Can you please cite things? Where is it proven that muscle strength can diminish after 2 days of rest?
4/21/2014 9:34:53 AM
What caught my attention was the comments about cal burn readouts being overinflated on exercise equipment, etc. I think that the fitness tracker on this site is way overinflated. I'm pretty sure that I don't burn 300 cals doing 9 sets of lifts with my 10# weights, for example.
Dear Lynna. The advice here is not really inconsistent. If you did 10 minutes of exercise everyday would you be healthier over the long run than if you did nothing? Yes. Would you ever reach your fittest? No. If you worked up to 30 minutes/day would you be even fitter? Yes. The first truth is an important truth, as we become fitter, we need to "up" our routineto challenge our bodies. The 10 minutes is our spark, but it is not yet our flame. If I'm in a blue mood and only do 10 minutes of pushups, abs, squats and stretches in the AM, will not that effort pay off? Yes. Will it make me into the fit person I want to be. No, but that 10 minutes makes me worlds better than nothing.
I do agree not everything counts as exercise, however, I am confused it states that 10, 30 or even 60 minutes of exercise a day may not be enough. On spark they encourage at least 10 minutes everyday. Some parts of this article disagrees with what the site promotes.
People need to chill here. If you're this resentful for hearing the truth about attaining and maintaining your health, you're deluding yourselves. It's unpleasant, and she did call the article "cold, hard truths," but that's the situation. Accept it. There is no magic bullet. If your quality of life matters, you'll listen.
12/9/2013 8:14:13 PM
Well, I'm 62 and unable to do much exercise other than physical therapy. Nonetheless, my internist is very happy with my weight and BMI of 19.5, plus normal-range blood tests. So I wonder if our individual circumstances don't often override more general, broad-based exercise recommendations.
....So...does exercise really help us live longer, or does it just *seem* longer?
This article certainly makes it seem like the latter will be the truth. For those of us without HRMs, without hours a day to devote to nothing but fitness, who may be bound to our chairs by our careers, this sounds like a whole lot of "why bother?" If I can't exercise at top form for a long period, it's no use. If my exercise is routine, it's no use. If I'm not sweating bullets and running miles, it's no use. All those years of taking the stairs and parking far away were of no use. Sounds like we're back to "The only way to lose weight is to beat yourself to a pulp and live on plain lettuce."
I exercise -and I lift - because I like how it makes me feel, but I guess my belief that this effort was aiding my weight loss is just not right. Thanks for setting me straight on that, Nichole.
Someone who commented which is in her 60's was concerned about vigorous exercise. I recently read that vigorous exercise for post menopausal women is not recommended because it raises cortisol levels (stress hormone) which can increase diseases of many sorts (esp. heart) because we no longer have estrogen produced in our bodies to help keep that cortisol level in check. What IS recommended is leisurely walking for an hour or more each day and yoga for its calming effects. I do both and have been able to maintain my 95 lb weight loss.
SparkPeople, SparkCoach, SparkPages, SparkPoints, SparkTeams, SparkDiet, SparkAmerica, SparkRecipes, DailySpark, and other marks are trademarks of SparkPeople, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
SPARKPEOPLE is a registered trademark of SparkPeople, Inc. in the United States, European Union, Canada, and Australia. All rights reserved.