Member Comments for the Article:

Reference Guide to Exercise Intensity

An In-Depth Look at Heart Rate, RPE and the Talk Test

44 Comments



  • A very insightful article. I run and cycle and actually train in the 70-80% area. I have been doing this for a couple of years now and I find it works well for me. Thanks for the information. - 6/13/2016 1:16:33 PM
  • Thank you so much for this article! I have been wondering about it, but haven't had time to look it up. Whenever I start exercising again I can't use the recommended heart rates. But after I've been back exercising consistently for a month, then I can start using it. - 5/20/2016 9:08:46 AM
  • I usually do the talk test or PRE, heart rate calculations don't seem to work for me. If I used the guidelines for that I'd never get in a good workout. My resting pulse is normal-to-high (78 last I checked) but I periodically check on the monitors on the gym machines (which admittedly I know are inaccurate) and my heart rate gets really high, like around 180 if I'm pushing myself, 150-160 if just walking on the treadmill at an incline. I have no idea why my heart rate gets so high, when I was in the military my workouts would push it past my "max" heart rate. - 5/15/2016 11:26:33 PM
  • I do the exertion thing, I cannot hold a conversation though so I guess I am working too hard. I am out of breath most of the time while I am walking and especially when I get to go to the gym and use the elliptical or stair climber. I just know I have lost 21 pounds in about 4 months and still have close to 30 to go. - 4/19/2016 9:45:32 PM
  • I can't use the target heart rate method either. I doubt my heart would handle it very well. I run out of breath long before I get there. I will do what I can do, and hope it is enough. I need to lose the weight, but am not willing to die trying. - 4/3/2016 11:00:11 PM
  • Definitely cannot use the target heart rate method - my minimum would throw me into A-Fib if it got that high. I do use perceived rate of exertion and the talk test which both seem to work for me! Research all suggestions then listen to your body!! - 3/12/2016 8:58:28 AM
  • Does this work for people who have a pacemaker/defibrillator? I don 't believe my heart rate is allowed to go over 80. - 11/26/2015 11:10:43 PM
  • PUCAKNAPP
    The chart on page 4 has an error. The order should be---
    8. Very hard
    9. Extremely hard
    10. Maximum exertion
    http://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/basi
    cs/measuring/exertion.htm - 11/7/2015 10:18:34 AM
  • I know some people like the definite quantification of having heart rate numbers, but individuals vary in this as in all other bodily measures. A friend's husband was getting extremely frustrated that he was not getting his heart rate up in his "target zone". He finally brought it up with his doctor, who told him that a lifetime of athletic activity had adapted his heart to have a larger than average stroke volume, which meant that his heart was very strong and efficient, pumping more blood per beat, and didn't need to be in the "target zone" to support vigorous activity. Numbers can be a guideline, but they are not the end-all and be-all. - 9/29/2015 11:18:57 AM
  • The older you get, the more different the results of these two formulas are. Very confusing. - 9/29/2015 10:31:12 AM
  • Great info! Thank you for the updated info !!! I've been using the numbers from 20 years ago!!!! - 9/8/2015 12:21:24 PM
  • Good info! Thanks. - 9/5/2015 10:07:41 AM
  • This was really excellent information, which really helps me a lot more than the general, often conflicting, info out there. Thanks too for the Target Heart Rate Calculator and link--that's really helpful! - 6/18/2015 5:41:16 PM
  • WENDYSIAN
    @BELDAME
    I can't stop laughing at your comment lolol
    Its really tickled me that. Fair play, what you say is very true mind! - 5/8/2015 2:12:55 PM
  • NJMSTAR
    I think the the standard formula for determining MHR is very inaccurate for many people. I bought a heart rate monitor thinking I must not be working hard enough because I never saw improvement in my fitness level. According to the formula I should be in defib at rates over 160, but I found that I was frequently in the low to mid 160's and felt fine. When I slow down to the 75 to 80% range it feels like nothing more than a casual stroll. Although I am in better shape than many my age (60), I would hardly be considered an athlete, just a slightly overweight housewife. - 4/11/2015 10:05:09 AM

Comment Pages (3 total)
[1]

Leave a comment


  Log in to leave a comment.