sorry guys, there are few imprecisions in the article. if margarine is blended with water, weight per weight it will not have the same energy content as original butter. meanwhile: what is wrong with little saturated fat? i am a nutritionist but the author of the article is not and i see the difference. i assure you, once you started eating healthily and exercising, butter or full-fat milk is not your enemy anymore. in fact, that little extra fat increases satiety, and actually helps to absorb and utilize the calcium with thecontains naturally occurring vitamin D3 (instead of vitamin D2 in fortified products, having a lower bioactivity than D3). once you take fat from the milk, vitamin D3 goes with it, too. at least, semi-skimmed is a good compromise and it tastes much better. skimmed milk is just a by-product of dairy production that would otherwise be drained away. now they found the way to sell it to you for the same price as a real milk.
also: why scared of HFCS but not of sugar? dont you have sugar in the USA? i know that its per capita availability has slightly increased while the HFCS was on the decline in the past several years. and they are virtually the same nutritionally and metabolically, if there is not the HFCS-90.
why do you not let nutritionist write the articles about nutrition? i mean the qualified nutritionists. i am not going to apply for a job here, i have just pointed out how misleading these articles can be.
- 3/2/2014 4:14:59 PM