Major disappointment! I thought the title of this blog meant that gay was no longer politically correct as a description of people with what most of the world thinks is a non-standard lifestyle.
I thought, finally, I'll be able to sing the "Legend of Zorro" without looking over my shoulder. Darn.
@ CEELEE53 - ....."heterosexuals can't seem to catch a break, esp. if they are old, white and conservative. A dying breed....." That statement is totally selfish. Homosexuals are also a "dying breed", even the young, those with color and liberal.
@ 4EVRYOUNG - ..... Not yours, too? Say it isn't so! "If it wasn't for the fact that I hate the cold, I'd have moved from the South years ago ..... Redneck, in-bred, racist, close-minded clowns." Jeez, that's a tough thing to take, but, even in the best of families ......
@ COACHPENNY - "The idiots pushing this legislation should be outed for lunacy." Actually, they should be treated exactly the same as those idiot legislators who hold parents responsible of the actions of their children, but won't let the parents know their underage children are being free birth control by an irresponsible government. If both types of idiots were eliminated, the next election would have a LOT of vacancies.
@ CEELEE53 - "We are witnessing the unravelling(sic) of a political party. A party so uptight and bound by it's religious right that all we can do is watch in amazement at one implosion after another." If you are talking about the RNC, the members of the so-called "Grand Old Party", they differ not one whit from those who control the Democrat Party. All you have to do is to look at how many true conservatives made it to nominating convention. None. It was a done deal and the true conservatives were never given a chance to participate. In general, BOTH party's have their fair share of idiots - Democrats in the Senate and Vice Presidency and Republicans in the House.
@ WILLAMLC - "And since we sharing secrets.. it is part of the “gay life style” to make sure we make an old white folk miserable a day… we have quotas, you know?" ROTF ..... "quotas" ..... LMAO. Willam, Dr. Sir, I have watched thousands on the Comedy Channel who can not come close to the humor you have in just one of your little fingers. I am absolutely not demeaning you in any way. Of everyone on this team, you seem to be able to reach out and grasp a bright gem of humor ..... more than all of the rest of us together.
@ CEELEE53 - You didn't have to be gay, Jewish, Catholic, Mexican, Asian or black in small town schools to meet the best bullies. If you were shorter than your peers, had skipped a grade, was a year younger than the other members of your class and was a "curve-buster", you met with the best, second best and third best bullies in school. The key to stopping bullies in school was being smarter. There really is no such thing as a fair fight. Being bullied by someone who is 10" taller and 60-70# heavier isn't fair. Neither is it fair to ambush that same bully. Even if they are bigger, slower and dumber - they can learn that being a bully doesn't protect them from what they are willing to deal out to others.
@ COACHPENNY - Whether Barry Sotero was born in the United States or not is not the main issue. If we give him the possibility he was born in Hawaii and ignore the numbering of birth certificates and acknowledge his mother as a natural born American - he still does not meet the qualifications to be President because his father was NOT a natural born American or any kind of American at all (and from some reports, his father would be classified as a bigamist in the United States, making his marriage to Barry's mom null and void). Then, you have to ignore the subject of Barry's SSN. It boggles the mind to accept that a future Presidential contender would have a SSN designated for use by Connecticut citizens show up issued to a person born in Hawaii or moved to Oregon at a young age. Only in a comic book. I have a simple challenge for you dear lady. Prove he is not a Muslim, that he is not a socialist, that he wasn't born in Nigeria as he claimed in a book he wrote. Prove that the "counseling" required for old people is not the equivalent to "death panels" in his loudly touted health plan; prove his economic actions aren't bleeding the economy dry; prove he has taken no actions to violate his Oath of Office; prove he isn't intent on taking guns away from legal citizens; prove he opposes the targeting of American citizens for death without due process. Finally, prove that every one of his Executive Orders comply with the Constitution.
And he's supposed to be some sort of Constitutional scholar. From a number of his Executive orders, his Constitutional Law professors must have been a combination of Socialists, Fascists and Communist.
Just so y'all will have something to look forward to, I'll list the EO's I believe violate the Constitution and quote the section of the Constitution the violate by Saturday, February 9, 2013.
Don't try to float that pathetic balloon about the length of my rebuttals unless you recognize the reason is the number of posts that need rebutting.