Author: Sorting Last Post on Top ↓ Message:
GORDONFREECHMAN's Photo GORDONFREECHMAN SparkPoints: (32,829)
Fitness Minutes: (70,218)
Posts: 71
1/24/13 8:03 A

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
SLYSAM - Thank you so much for your comprehensive answer(s)! That was just the type of information I was looking for. :)

Admin of the SparkPeople Circus SparkTeam


 current weight: 139.0 
 
155
149.75
144.5
139.25
134
SLYSAM's Photo SLYSAM SparkPoints: (39,890)
Fitness Minutes: (102,199)
Posts: 1,473
1/23/13 3:21 P

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
Side note re: jumping rope and jumping jacks. This really surprised me, but when I compared the fitbit burn to my heart rate monitor burn they are often the same for jumping rope. I think the impact counts a little in the fitbit intensity, but I would expect the hrm to estimate a higher burn due to the constant arm movements. Jumping jacks tend to count as 3 steps or so for me so it does give it a pretty fast pace. I did a workout dvd called "Brooklyn Bridge Bootcamp" and was surprised that both my Polar hrm and fitbit gave the exact same calorie estimate for this workout. This workout alternates between cardio and bodyweight strength (or resistance band intensified bodyweight). During the cardio portion you can run or do jumping jacks and other plyos. I tend to jump rope, run in place or do jumping jacks during the cardio portions. The whole workout was red (very active) spikes with little yellow dips during the strength portions. The fitbit might estimate the activity/calorie burn from jump roping and jumping jacks okay for you. Of course, the distance is meaningless for those activities. Most of the strength exercises included in the workout mentioned are generally not well tracked by the fitbit (there were a lot of pushups for example).

 December Minutes: 703
 
0
500
1000
1500
2000
SLYSAM's Photo SLYSAM SparkPoints: (39,890)
Fitness Minutes: (102,199)
Posts: 1,473
1/23/13 3:10 P

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
I didn't change mine for the first year or so. Then I did. In my case, I did notice a difference. I ended up achieving fewer "very active" minutes from walking (I think this is a good thing). Before I calibrated my stride, I saw very active minutes when fitbit determined I walked or ran faster than 3.8 mph. This happened pretty much whenever I did a brisk walk for more than 5-10 minutes. I do walk pretty briskly though. I did notice my distance when I walk briskly was always farther than I walked (it was fine for slower steps as near as I can tell). When I tested and changed my walking and running stride settings, I still see very active minutes when I exceed 3.8mph only now it is harder. Usually when I walk, it counts as "fairly active" minutes unless I am really walking like I am in a hurry. My distance has been more accurate too. I suspect my height based running stride was too long and was being applied to my brisk walks.

I am not sure how much of a difference with calorie burn it made, as my weight and age has changed so I just burn fewer calories now anyway. I do think the activity levels and distance are more accurate for me now though. I don't consider normal in town walking to be "very active" for me--unless I am going as fast as I can so I prefer it being counted as "fairly active" time. I think for some people the height based defaults are fine--possibly the same as what you would enter if you calibrated your stride. I think it just depends on whether you are noticing inflated distances and activity compared your actual activity.

 December Minutes: 703
 
0
500
1000
1500
2000
CHERISEWS's Photo CHERISEWS SparkPoints: (8,278)
Fitness Minutes: (20,178)
Posts: 309
1/20/13 5:03 A

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
I didn't feel the need to adjust mine either. When I first got it, I watched the screen while I walked and it matched up perfectly. Every time my foot hit the ground the fitbit recorded a step.

Edited by: CHERISEWS at: 1/20/2013 (05:05)
"I like to think there is a little starlight in all of us."
― Lisa Kleypas


 December Minutes: 0
 
0
41.25
82.5
123.75
165
SHEENADEE's Photo SHEENADEE SparkPoints: (164,953)
Fitness Minutes: (142,036)
Posts: 21,189
1/20/13 2:50 A

Community Team Member

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
I did change mine to what I thought my average stride is for most of my walking exercise. I do not know if it affected calories burned at all; I wasn't expecting it to do that and didn't even try to compare. But, it definitely affected the distance. I will probably adjust some more because I think I put a stride that is too short. I like it to be accurate for my walking workout; not worried about the incidental walking around.

Merle
Ohio

"I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do something. And I will not let what I cannot do interfere with what I can do."
Edward Everett Hale

Leader of Wii Fit Challenge & Wii Top Scores teams. Come check us out:

WFC: www.sparkpeople.com/myspark/groups_i
ndividual.asp?gid=21455


Top Scores: www.sparkpeople.com/myspark/groups_i
ndividual.asp?gid=25039


 December Minutes: 692
 
0
35.75
71.5
107.25
143
60NLOVINIT2's Photo 60NLOVINIT2 SparkPoints: (34,707)
Fitness Minutes: (4,593)
Posts: 2,027
1/19/13 10:00 P

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
interesting question... i will have to check on that...

betsy
in north carolina

its all about giving and receiving friendship and well deserved help.


 current weight: 250.0 
 
260
222.5
185
147.5
110
ROCKMAN6797's Photo ROCKMAN6797 Posts: 4,287
1/19/13 8:57 P

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
There is no default stride length rather FB calculates your stride length based on your height and gender.

Raúl
Leader of the FitBit Users Unite! SparkTeam
www.fitbit.com/user/228NLM
~Keep moving people!~
^^^You got this!^^^
*** Just Do! ***


 current weight: 205.6 
 
344
303
262
221
180
TWILAQ1's Photo TWILAQ1 Posts: 479
1/19/13 8:19 P

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
What is the default stride length that the FItbit comes programmed with?

Stepping in a rhythm to a Kurtis Blow
Who needs to think when your feet just go

~Tom Tom Club (Genius of Love)


 current weight: 180.4 
 
215
197.5
180
162.5
145
ROCKMAN6797's Photo ROCKMAN6797 Posts: 4,287
1/19/13 7:12 P

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
Personally I noticed better accuracy for runs/walks. I am not so concerned with the step count while performing other activities because honestly they amount to very little when compared to the whole picture.

Raúl
Leader of the FitBit Users Unite! SparkTeam
www.fitbit.com/user/228NLM
~Keep moving people!~
^^^You got this!^^^
*** Just Do! ***


 current weight: 205.6 
 
344
303
262
221
180
USMAWIFE's Photo USMAWIFE SparkPoints: (486,929)
Fitness Minutes: (448,995)
Posts: 119,801
1/19/13 5:38 P

Community Team Member

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
I think most did not bother. They just let the system figure it out

Everybody tells me that they would love to knit, but they don't have time. I look at people's lives and I can see opportunity and time for knitting all over the place. The time spent riding the bus each day? That's a pair of socks over a month. Waiting in line? Mittens. Watching TV? Buckets of wasted time that could be an exquisite lace shawl. ~Stephanie Pearl-McPhee, At Knit's End: Meditations for Women Who Knit Too Much


 current weight: 198.0 
 
253
224.75
196.5
168.25
140
ACTIVEGRANDMAP's Photo ACTIVEGRANDMAP Posts: 3,152
1/19/13 4:41 P

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
I didn't bother. It said they use your stats to set your stried, so I figured it's close enough. Pam

"A merry heart doeth good like a medicine"
Proverbs 17:22


 current weight: -6.0  under
 
10
5
0
-5
-10
GORDONFREECHMAN's Photo GORDONFREECHMAN SparkPoints: (32,829)
Fitness Minutes: (70,218)
Posts: 71
1/19/13 4:34 P

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
For those of you who have set your stride length under your Fitbit profile: Did you notice a big difference in your calories burned/distance traveled? Do you like it better than the automatically-calculated values? Does it even matter to you?

I don't know if it's worth it—I mainly just compare myself with myself, so I'm not overly concerned about accuracy. Plus, my stride varies depending on how fast I am running or walking, so it can't be very accurate in any case. Not to mention the fact that I do a lot of jump roping and jumping jacks, which must throw off the Fitbit something fierce!

What do you all think?

Admin of the SparkPeople Circus SparkTeam


 current weight: 139.0 
 
155
149.75
144.5
139.25
134
Page: 1 of (1)  

Report Innappropriate Post

Other Fitbit Users Unite! General Team Discussion Forum Posts

Topics: Last Post:
Fitness entry on Spark people 11/8/2013 10:41:09 AM
FitBit Flex on ankle or shoe? 10/2/2013 6:39:04 AM
FitBit and Consumer Reports 10/1/2013 7:51:09 AM
New! 11/21/2014 7:00:00 PM
Fitbit download/upload to Spark 3/31/2014 6:45:58 PM

Thread URL: http://www.sparkpeople.com/myspark/team_messageboard_thread.asp?board=0x36986x51724102

Review our Community Guidelines