Thanks for the information! I ran for a mile than walked for a minute, which worked well until there was a 2 mile uphill. At that point I needed much more frequent walk breaks. Seemed like no one in the race could run consistently up the hill. I wound up finishing in 1.03, which is much better than I expected, particularly because of the evil hill.
April Minutes: 217
Fitness Minutes: (151) Posts: 96 2/29/12 6:41 P
My last 5K, I ran 5 minutes/walked :40 seconds. I had done a race rehearsal at run 5:00/walk :30 and decided :30 was a little bit short. But, unlike other people here, I've had trouble once the walk break get shorter than about :40. But like everyone else said, I would experiment with a few ratios and see what works best for you.
Fitness Minutes: (152,329) Posts: 12,004 2/29/12 1:03 P
Ideally, you should do some race "rehearsals" before hand to learn what works best for you. I am faster (so far) with a few, very short, walk breaks in a 5K. What I did for one was 3/:30 and then the next I did 1/:10. The latter yielded my best time so far. But I am used to taking short walk breaks, so what works for me may not for you. It really depends on how you've trained and what your body/brain has adapted to.
For a 10K, I would probably use 1/:20.
The biggest factor in overall speed is how fast you run during the run segment. The walk break slow down is not as big a factor as increased running speed. What this means in a short race is that you want to walk enough to enable your body to run at its top speed during the run segment. If you save a few seconds by eliminating walk breaks, but that reduced walking also reduces your running speed by more, then you haven't gained.
Edited by: LIVE2RUN4LIFE at: 2/29/2012 (13:11)
If you're not having fun, then why run?
You don't get to choose how you're going to die, or when. You can only decide how you're going to live. Now. -- Joan Baez
We are what we think. All that we are arises with our thoughts. With our thoughts we make the world. -- the Buddha
I think I ran more like 30 seconds. Because there were hills I walked after completing mile one and the slightly before the end of mile 2. I could see I'd be over the top of a hill if I waited for the end of the mile. So if you looked at my paces for the miles mile 2 was slow and had both walk breaks. I was tempted to skip the walk breaks, although Jeff claims you get faster times.
I took short walk breaks on the mile for my 5K. I did walk breaks from the beginning for my HM, dropped them in the last 3 miles. Jeff Galloways 5k/10k book recommendations on walk breaks for the race. They are less frequent than for training. For a pace of 10 min/mile or faster they are every mile and then more frequent. If you tell me your target pace I can give you the book's recommendation.
Hi all, I am signed up for a local 10k race. I have never done a 10k, just 5k's and a half marathon. I typically have run the whole 5k, without any walk breaks. In all my half marathon training I used the intervals for the long runs, as well as in the race. I was wondering if there is a certain distance/time when it is beneficial to use intervals versus running the whole race. I guess I am a little worried that the intervals may slow me down in this shorter race.
SparkPeople, SparkCoach, SparkPages, SparkPoints, SparkDiet, SparkAmerica, SparkRecipes, DailySpark, and other marks are trademarks of SparkPeople, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
SPARKPEOPLE is a registered trademark of SparkPeople, Inc. in the United States, European Union, Canada, and Australia. All rights reserved.