Author: Sorting Last Post on Top ↓ Message:
FOLEY56's Photo FOLEY56 Posts: 678
5/1/08 11:47 A

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
I always show my Drivers License along with my voter card when I vote here in PA. I do it for my own assurance that the volunteers are doing their jobs correctly.

 current weight: 319.0 
OLDHAG1's Photo OLDHAG1 Posts: 1,085
4/30/08 5:27 P

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
The perfect example of how important it is that the right choice is made in a presidential election. GWB's appointments to the Supreme Court gave us this kind of stuff. OF COURSE IT IS A POLL TAX!!!

I was drawn to the next article in your link, "Distant Echoes of Vietnam, the Day I Lost My Innocence." OMG, I wish that everyone in this country could read that article; especially any young person considering "signing up".

Thank you so much for that link, BBFMAIL!



 current weight: 164.0 
JULIEH65's Photo JULIEH65 Posts: 284
4/30/08 1:31 P

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
We have the same law in ND. Working with low-income and homeless people I realize what a deterrent it is. Especially now that they require a birth certificate to get an id and an id to get a copy of their birth certificate.

"For me the most unfair peace is preferable to the most righteous war."
Marcuc Tullius Cicero

 current weight: 244.0 
BBFMAIL Posts: 1,469
4/30/08 12:41 P

Send Private Message
See for complete article. Today's also has an excellent article on the subject.

Voter IDs as a New Kind of Poll Tax
Did the Supreme Court Just Elect John McCain?


The US Supreme Court has just dealt a serious blow to voters' rights that could help put John McCain in the White House by eliminating tens of thousands of voters who generally vote Democratic.

By 6-3 the Court has upheld an Indiana law that requires citizens to present a photo identification card in order to vote. Florida, Michigan, Louisiana, Georgia, Hawaii and South Dakota have similar laws. Though it's unlikely, as many as two dozen other states could add them by election day. Other states, like Ohio, have less stringent ID requirements than Indiana's, but still have certain restrictions that are strongly opposed by voter rights advocates.

The decision turns back two centuries of jurisprudence that has accepted a registered voter's signature as sufficient identification for casting a ballot. By matching that signature against one given at registration, and with harsh penalties for ballot stuffing, the Justices confirmed in their lead opinion that there is "no evidence" for the kind of widespread voter fraud Republican partisans have used to justify the demand for photo ID.

Voting rights activists have long argued that since photo ID can cost money, or may demand expensive trips to government agencies, the requirement constitutes a "poll tax." Taxes on the right to vote were used for a century to prevent blacks and others from voting in the south and elsewhere. They were specifically banned by the 24th Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1964.

Page: 1 of (1)  

Report Innappropriate Post

Other Proud Blue Liberals General Team Discussion Forum Posts

Topics: Last Post:
Sessions in session 6/14/2017 1:32:52 PM
Meme SHARE 2/20/2017 11:15:19 AM
A new depth of stupid 6/26/2017 9:06:11 PM
Unbelieveable, except everything's believeable now 7/3/2017 2:00:44 PM
In other news... 5/22/2017 7:26:21 PM

Thread URL:

Review our Community Guidelines