|Author:||Sorting Last Post on Top ↓ Message:||
I use a HRM too. Bf's driod has a tracker for mileage and he wanted to check the calorie counter. It was only at 750 and my HRM said 1038... HUGE difference!
Sunny Gals Shine Brighter and Lighter
I use my HRM to determine my calorie burn. I burn quite a bit more running than SP says, but if I chart my bike ride on the fitness map and input the time it took, the count is pretty much right on, regardless of the hilly terrain.
Persevere. Even if you fall on your face, you have moved forward.
PROGRESS, NOT PERFECTION.
Dare I say it? Try this...
It works better with Firefox, but IE will work, too. Although IE will give you a (bogus) security warning that Firefox will not.
This is on my personal server so I can attest it's virus\infection free.
Edited by: SWEETCYCLINHAMS at: 9/6/2010 (18:39)
I've noticed to that the CC doesn't account for riding against the wind. There are times when I may ride 20 miles against a 15-25 mph head wind. I know it has to burn more calories.
Me and the CC have never gotten along anyway. If I burned up what it says then I would be skinny as a bean pole. But I am not. My body just doesn't burn what it says. It takes its time and does it own thing regardless of how low I go on the calorie count and how high I go on the supposed burning of calories.
Edited by: SIGLED at: 9/6/2010 (10:55)
I don't ride the bike to lose weight, but I lose weight to ride the bike!
To GOD be the Glory!
I always wear a heart rate monitor.... Well worth the investment, check out Amazon, Dick's sporting goods or your local Bike Shop.. I wear a Sygma but Polar makes great ones also..
I have the same problem. It's really hilly here and I can see that the Spark calorie counter is only calibrated for actual speed, which can be actually quite slow if the hill is very steep.
I bought a Garmin Edge and it seems to slightly adjust the calories depending on the "feet of ascent", but even that isn't very accurate.
Whenever I have a day of hill climbs, I'm always disappointed by the calorie burn which is based on my slow speed rather than the effort.
“The only way to keep your health is to eat what you don't want, drink what you don't like, and do what you'd rather not.”
Does anyone know how efficient the calorie counter is for biking here on Spark? The only reason I ask is because it doesn't seem to account for the terrain ( I am in NW WA and we have a ton of hills) or the weather such as wend which adds resistance.
Or does anyone know one that includes all factors?
|Are you looking for a challenge ?||3/5/2014 1:59:21 AM|
|Sudden HR Increase When Cycling - Anyone Else?||8/18/2013 10:26:51 PM|
|Bike repair question||5/15/2013 9:45:21 AM|
|How To Talk to Non-Cyclists About Cycling Safety||6/11/2013 1:52:06 PM|
|Nutrition: Before & During||11/18/2013 1:06:14 PM|