0
 
Author: Sorting First Post on Top ↑ Message:
NITEMAN3D's Photo NITEMAN3D SparkPoints: (96,578)
Fitness Minutes: (17,460)
Posts: 5,067
4/30/14 4:18 P

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
Attempting to include a reduction in the additional exercise calories would also exclude the many folks here who are in maintenance, having already reached their goals.

emoticon

"What the mind of man can conceive and believe, the mind of man can achieve." --Napoleon Hill
SPARK_COACH_JEN's Photo SPARK_COACH_JEN Posts: 56,655
4/30/14 1:36 P

SparkPeople Team Member

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
When you choose the option to have your fitness and nutrition trackers communicate (so that your range changes based on how much exercise you do), your base calorie range the program gives you already accounts for your weight loss goal. For instance, say your range is 1200-1550 to start and you burn 200 calories through exercise. Your program assumes you'll reach your goal by eating in that base range, so it adds back all of the exercise calories burned. If it didn't, then your deficit would be even larger, theoretically setting you up for a greater amount of weight loss than you've set in your program goals.

Does that help?

Coach Jen

"You may have a fresh start any moment you choose, for this thing that we call "failure" is not the falling down but the staying down." Mary Pickford

"No matter how slow you go, you are still lapping everybody on the couch."
PERFECTVELVET's Photo PERFECTVELVET SparkPoints: (61,080)
Fitness Minutes: (39,549)
Posts: 6,371
4/30/14 12:43 P

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
I think the base range already has the reduction in it, so if you did zero exercise for the entire week, you could still lose. Plus your body continues to burn calories after you work out, so you are still getting some benefit to it.

Keri ~ Springfield, Illinois

"FAR more often than not; YES it is your fault, and YES, it was preventable. Just fess up and take charge of your health, your future... your life. Remember, you’re not a failure until you start blaming someone else." - Sean Patrick Flanery


 Pounds lost: 3.0 
 
0
3
6
9
12
LILSPARKGIRL's Photo LILSPARKGIRL Posts: 2,740
4/30/14 11:58 A

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
I have seen this discussed and I think if you are looking to lose, most add back only half.

1st Goal: 18lbs by June 1 - Met goal on 4/28

2nd Goal: Onederland by July 31



 current weight: 211.0 
 
243
231.75
220.5
209.25
198
BART3764's Photo BART3764 SparkPoints: (1,587)
Fitness Minutes: (1,573)
Posts: 5
4/30/14 11:48 A

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
I just changed my nutrition tracker to adjust my calorie range when I exercise. I understand that it adds whatever calorie burn I had for my workout, I can eat back. Am I alone in seeing this as detrimental? I understand that you need to increase your intake, but I wouldn't think that you'd add it ALL back in. In my head I can see it being useful that if I burned 400 calories, I could add back in 200 for consumption. For me, this would cover my after workout snack. Can someone help me in the logic of it? I wish there was a way we could chose what % of our burn we want to add to our nutrition.



 current weight: 251.7 
 
257
225.25
193.5
161.75
130
Page: 1 of (1)  

Report Innappropriate Post

Other Diet and Nutrition Topics:

Topics: Last Post:
Cutting Out Processed Foods 12/10/2014 10:15:52 AM
tracking meats and dishes with multiple foods 8/13/2014 6:26:07 AM
Herbal Tea or water? 9/8/2014 4:26:36 PM
it is hard eat the meal 9/21/2014 6:31:11 PM
Wall Street Journal on salt 8/27/2014 9:26:49 PM

Thread URL: http://www.sparkpeople.com/myspark/messageboard.asp?imboard=7&imparent=33554358

Review our Community Guidelines





Diet Resources: aromatherapy classes | wholesale aromatherapy | aromatherapy training