I don't think so, no.
For starters, I don't think you have enough to lose to be able to manage 2 lbs per week. If you were looking at 50+ pounds to lose, then yes, but you have about 24 to lose, according to your ticker. The less we have to lose, the slower it will come off. For your goal, something closer to .5-1 lb per week would be much more reasonable.
Eating less than your recommended range will NOT make it come off faster, either; less is not more in this case. In fact, undereating by so much (up to 200 less than your minimum range) will actually slow your metabolism because it's not enough to fuel your workouts. The range you are given is to account for your exercise. www.sparkpeople.com/community/ask_the_expe
Are you sure you have your goals set up properly? That doesn't sound like the kind of range a 2 lb loss at your weight would produce.
Edited by: DRAGONCHILDE at: 2/5/2013 (18:24)
Writer, mother, wife, and breadwinner. I love to run, but running doesn't love me, so I'm switching to my low-impact bike.
I'm not pregnant, just fat: My blog. fatnotpregnant.blogspot.com/
| current weight: 190.6