Advertisement -- Learn more about ads on this site.

 
Message Boards
FORUM:   Fitness and Exercise
TOPIC:  

Hiking and tracking it



Click here to read our frequently asked Fitness and Exercise questions.

 
  Reply Create A New Topic
Search the
Message Boards:
Search
  I Liked This Topic Subscribe to this Discussion Share
Add This to My SparkFavorites
Advertisement -- Learn more about ads on this site.

Author: Message: Sort First Post on Top


FIELDWORKING
FIELDWORKING's Photo SparkPoints: (22,022)
Fitness Minutes: (42,203)
Posts: 601
10/29/13 9:36 A

FIELDWORKING's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
Thanks. I guess I underestimate the calories burned when hiking.



 Pounds lost: 32.2 
 
0
10.75
21.5
32.25
43


MOTIVATED@LAST
MOTIVATED@LAST's Photo Posts: 13,910
10/27/13 9:07 P

MOTIVATED@LAST's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
A very rough rule of thumb is that you burn about 100 calories per mile walked on level ground, although this may vary with body weight.

This increases to 125-150 per mile walked on rougher terrain, or carrying a small pack.

Carrying a larger pack can increase this even more.

So all of those figures seem feasible, depending on the conditions. From your description of the conditions, 373 in 60 minutes is pretty reasonable. This is on the moderate end of a 60 minute workout.

M@L

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.


 current weight: 178.0 
 
220
203.5
187
170.5
154


FIELDWORKING
FIELDWORKING's Photo SparkPoints: (22,022)
Fitness Minutes: (42,203)
Posts: 601
10/27/13 5:25 P

FIELDWORKING's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
Thanks for the reminder about the airplane mode. I have used it before on trails that I haven't hiked before. I forgot to turn it on before I started the trail. I knew the length (distance & time) of the trail because I'd hiked it before.

What you said makes sense. I guess I don't think that anyone could burn that many calories hiking because I enjoy hiking. The steepness of a trail (500 ft in this case) seems a lot easier than doing the same thing on a sidewalk, treadmill, or the elliptical. Again, I guess it's because I enjoy hiking.

Thanks for the input.

Edit: I looked to see what it said for hiking (cross country and carrying less than 10 lbs). The cross country was 373 calories for 60 minutes and 440 for carrying less than 10 lbs for the same amount of time. The 221 calories was for the walking/running under the mileage tracker where you can enter in the time and distance.

Edited by: FIELDWORKING at: 10/27/2013 (17:32)

 Pounds lost: 32.2 
 
0
10.75
21.5
32.25
43


AZULVIOLETA6
AZULVIOLETA6's Photo SparkPoints: (51,532)
Fitness Minutes: (62,903)
Posts: 2,567
10/27/13 5:18 P

AZULVIOLETA6's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
That sounds about right or perhaps a bit low.

I generally track hikes just based on how fast I am walking--spend a lot of time on a treadmill and you get a sense for pace.

Exercise tracking is always just an estimate.

Dances: salsa (standard/LA), casino, rueda de casino, cumbia Colombiana, bachata, mambo, cha-cha-chá, merengue, reggaetón.

Currently learning: Mexican cumbia, danzón, Cuban rumba

Dances to Learn in the future: flamenco, tango Argentino, samba, belly dancing, bhangra, ballroom rumba


 current weight: 212.0 
 
300
272.5
245
217.5
190


MOTIVATED@LAST
MOTIVATED@LAST's Photo Posts: 13,910
10/27/13 12:16 A

MOTIVATED@LAST's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
Actually, I would have said that 221 was a bit low.

Speed is not a major factor in calories burned - total distance covered is the major factor. And anyway, 3 mph on a trail is a pretty good speed.

Hiking on a trail also burns more than a side-walk - the rougher the trail, the more effort it takes to lift your feet over obstacles, keep your body upright and balanced on an uneven trail, etc.

A rough guide is that each vertical foot is about equivalent in effort to 8horizontal feet. So the 500 feet is equivalent to covering 4000 feet horizontally, or an extra 3/4 of a mile.

Also, mapmyrun doesn't need reception. You won't get maps, but the GPS functionality will still work, and track where you have been. (Just make sure you turn the phone onto airplane mode so as to not kill the battery searching for a signal).

M@L

Edited by: MOTIVATED@LAST at: 10/27/2013 (19:36)
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.


 current weight: 178.0 
 
220
203.5
187
170.5
154


FIELDWORKING
FIELDWORKING's Photo SparkPoints: (22,022)
Fitness Minutes: (42,203)
Posts: 601
10/26/13 10:40 A

FIELDWORKING's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
I enjoy hiking and go whenever I have the chance. I went for a hike yesterday. I couldn't track the distance and time on my phone (using MapMyRun) since I was in an area where I didn't get any reception. I have hiked the trail before and know that it is about 3 miles in length and takes me about an hour to complete. The elevation change was about 500 ft. The elevation change would've been 1,000 ft had I done the whole trail, but I made it shorter by taking a connecting trail to make it 3 miles instead of 4.4 miles.

Anyway, I am pretty confident (98% sure) that the trail I took was 3 miles. I entered it as a 3 mile walk in 60 minutes and I'm getting that I burned 221 calories. I think it's a little on the high side. I was able to do the trail in an hour even though I stopped several times. When I hike, I tend to go at a leisurely pace (what is leisurely for me) because I like to look at the plants and look for signs of wildlife (deer, coyote, and bobcat tracks, scat, etc.).

Basically I feel like 221 calories is a bit much. I have hiked the trail enough to know that it takes me an hour (give or take no a few minutes, but an hour is a good estimate due to the elevation change).

What suggestions do you guys have for tracking the hike? As a side note, I had already gone for a bike ride (a little over 4 miles) before going for the hike. I consider it more of a walk instead of a hike. I am tracking the hike under the mileage and not hiking because tracking it as hiking gives me almost double the amount of calories burned and I know that is way off.

Let me know if I need to clarify. Thanks.



 Pounds lost: 32.2 
 
0
10.75
21.5
32.25
43


 
Page: 1 of (1)  
Search  

I Liked This Topic Subscribe to this Discussion Share
Add This to My SparkFavorites
Report Innappropriate Post


Thread URL: http://www.sparkpeople.com/myspark/messageboard.asp?imboard=6&imparent=32285873

Review our Community Guidelines



 
Diet Resources: healthy easy meals for dinner | simple healthy dinner meals | what is a healthy snack