Advertisement -- Learn more about ads on this site.

 
Message Boards
FORUM:   Fitness and Exercise
TOPIC:  

Running up vs. Sparkpeople



Click here to read our frequently asked Fitness and Exercise questions.

 
  Reply Create A New Topic
Search the
Message Boards:
Search
  I Liked This Topic Subscribe to this Discussion Share
Add This to My SparkFavorites
Advertisement -- Learn more about ads on this site.

Author: Message: Sort First Post on Top


MOTIVATED@LAST
MOTIVATED@LAST's Photo Posts: 13,961
10/14/13 9:32 A

MOTIVATED@LAST's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
Well, admittedly, I bypass it and use the calculator at www.caloriesperhour.com/index_burn.php

I just find it easier to use.

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.


 current weight: 178.0 
 
220
203.5
187
170.5
154


ZORBS13
ZORBS13's Photo SparkPoints: (94,832)
Fitness Minutes: (96,252)
Posts: 12,927
10/14/13 8:20 A

ZORBS13's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
M@L - Spark's calculator is also ridiculously low for me as well, it estimates about 300-400 calories per hour of running at 9:30/mile.

“Sometimes the moments that challenge us the most, define us.” - Deena Kastor

Agatsu Kettlebell Instructor
Can-Fit-Pro Personal Trainer Specialist
9x marathon finisher/17x half marathon finisher
Mom (b. March 12, 2010)


 July Minutes: 2,136
 
0
375
750
1125
1500


MOTIVATED@LAST
MOTIVATED@LAST's Photo Posts: 13,961
10/14/13 3:21 A

MOTIVATED@LAST's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
All methods have their limitations.

Even heart rate monitors can produce misleading results for those with high blood pressure or some medications.

Online calculators tend to be reasonably accurate for well-studied activities like running, especially as the major factors in intensity (speed and bodyweight) can be fairly objectively measured.

I am surprised that Spark's estimate was so low, unless you were using the mapping based tool, which often gives quite weird calorie results.

In any event, 50 calories here or there is no big deal in nutrition - the body is designed to handle unders and overs like that. It is when your activity level estimate is regularly off by 500 calories that it is more concerning.

M@L

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.


 current weight: 178.0 
 
220
203.5
187
170.5
154


N33D2LOSE50
N33D2LOSE50's Photo SparkPoints: (16,120)
Fitness Minutes: (8,759)
Posts: 48
10/14/13 1:41 A

N33D2LOSE50's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
Thanks again for your feedback. I do realize it is an estimate. I program my app with the info needed for the most accurate estimate possible. I try not to get caught up with the numbers. I usually like to base it on how I feel n the progress I make. I was just wondering how far off the apps could be so adjustments can be made if need be. Thank you!

Be blessed cause I know I am!


 Pounds lost: 26.0 
 
0
12.5
25
37.5
50


ALBERTJON
SparkPoints: (3,133)
Fitness Minutes: (7,415)
Posts: 1,299
10/14/13 1:29 A

Send Private Message
Reply
N33D2LOSE50I: Intermittently, I have checked calorie burn calculators that purport to gauge how many calories a person burns for an activity based on weight, age, gender, height, etc. The bottom line is it comes to educated guestimations. I arrived at the totals I give myself based on an average of on-site calculators, HRM monitor, charts, and exercise module. The bottom line is that it is still guestimation. I tend to choose the "low end" such as for walking and spinning, and pay more intention to calories consumed and my weigh-ins.

"If any thing is sacred the human body is sacred...Have you seen the fool that corrupted his own live body? or the fool that corrupted her own live body? " -- Whitman

“Trust thyself: every heart vibrates to that iron string.” -- Emerson

"It's not what you look at that matters, it's what you see." -- Thoreau


 current weight: 182.6 
 
190.6
186.7
182.8
178.9
175


N33D2LOSE50
N33D2LOSE50's Photo SparkPoints: (16,120)
Fitness Minutes: (8,759)
Posts: 48
10/14/13 1:18 A

N33D2LOSE50's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
Thank u for your input. Now is there a product or something else out there that is a better guide for me to know how many calories i'm burning based off pace and distance?

Be blessed cause I know I am!


 Pounds lost: 26.0 
 
0
12.5
25
37.5
50


MOTIVATED@LAST
MOTIVATED@LAST's Photo Posts: 13,961
10/14/13 12:41 A

MOTIVATED@LAST's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
As a rough guide, you can expect to burn about 120-140 calories per mile of running, so both of them seem quite a way off.

I have definitely found that running apps WAY overestimate calories.

M@L

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.


 current weight: 178.0 
 
220
203.5
187
170.5
154


N33D2LOSE50
N33D2LOSE50's Photo SparkPoints: (16,120)
Fitness Minutes: (8,759)
Posts: 48
10/13/13 11:32 P

N33D2LOSE50's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
Which tracker for cardio activity do you feel is more reliable and accurate a running app on your phone vs. Sparkpeople activity tracker? The app i use on my phone will say that in a 2.5 mile activity running I burned 426 cals and on SP the activity tracker only says I burned 219 cals. So which one should i depend on so that I can adjust my caloric intake? Thank you!

Be blessed cause I know I am!


 Pounds lost: 26.0 
 
0
12.5
25
37.5
50


 
Page: 1 of (1)  
Search  

I Liked This Topic Subscribe to this Discussion Share
Add This to My SparkFavorites
Report Innappropriate Post


Thread URL: http://www.sparkpeople.com/myspark/messageboard.asp?imboard=6&imparent=32195895

Review our Community Guidelines



 
Diet Resources: back fat exercises | exercises for back fat | exercises for a fat back