0
 
Author: Sorting First Post on Top ↑ Message:
SPARK_COACH_JEN's Photo SPARK_COACH_JEN Posts: 55,781
10/7/13 1:38 P

SparkPeople Team Member

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
M@L has given you a great answer. It's not a scientific formula because there are so many variables involved, just very rough estimates based on some research and looking at what other sites have used.

Sorry I don't have a more specific answer for you!

Coach Jen

"You may have a fresh start any moment you choose, for this thing that we call "failure" is not the falling down but the staying down." Mary Pickford

"No matter how slow you go, you are still lapping everybody on the couch."
MOTIVATED@LAST's Photo MOTIVATED@LAST Posts: 14,106
10/5/13 6:25 P

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
Yeah, in terms of something that is defensible and backed by research, I'd say the development process was pretty much the a$$-pull method.

I don't think there is all that much behind it other than giving people the warm fuzzies to do the right thing.

M@L

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.


 current weight: 178.0 
 
220
203.5
187
170.5
154
PANFRIEDTROUT's Photo PANFRIEDTROUT Posts: 3,415
10/5/13 12:35 A

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
thanks for your reply, Motivated

the reason i'm asking is that for the longest time, a lot of Spark members & also the folks who run the site felt that calories weren't something that could be measured as so many variables go into strength training

so .... i'm curious as to how they went about developing this.

If you want to walk on water, you have to get out of the boat. (auth unk)

Time Zone is Pacific Standard (USA)


 Pounds lost: 39.0 
 
0
24
48
72
96
MOTIVATED@LAST's Photo MOTIVATED@LAST Posts: 14,106
10/5/13 12:23 A

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
I don't think there is much formula about it at all. It doesn't really seem to vary much between large and small muscles, or vary by weight, number of reps, etc.

But one well known study puts the metabolic gain from a regular program of lifting at about 150 calories per day. The very rough calorie estimates from Spark would give you something broadly consistent with this.

I don't think there is much scientific rigour about it, but if it encourages people to take up ST, well, its something I can live with.

M@L

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.


 current weight: 178.0 
 
220
203.5
187
170.5
154
PANFRIEDTROUT's Photo PANFRIEDTROUT Posts: 3,415
10/4/13 11:56 P

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
Apparently, when you add strength exercises now, it shows how many calories you burned. This is a "feature" many Spark members had asked for.

I'm wondering what formula was used to determine the calorie burn?

If you want to walk on water, you have to get out of the boat. (auth unk)

Time Zone is Pacific Standard (USA)


 Pounds lost: 39.0 
 
0
24
48
72
96
Page: 1 of (1)  

Report Innappropriate Post

Other Fitness and Exercise Topics:

Topics: Last Post:
Getting Started 7/22/2014 9:44:20 AM
do I burn fat at my job 7/24/2014 10:20:56 AM
Costochondritis and exercising 5/6/2014 10:49:54 AM
Fitness videos on the Roku 9/9/2014 11:41:34 AM
Zombies, Run! App? 5/12/2014 9:53:02 PM

Thread URL: http://www.sparkpeople.com/myspark/messageboard.asp?imboard=6&imparent=32131979

Review our Community Guidelines





Diet Resources: fast healthy dinner | healthy food for dinner | healthy dinner food