Advertisement -- Learn more about ads on this site.

 
Message Boards
FORUM:   Fitness and Exercise
TOPIC:  

Fitness Tracker Question



Click here to read our frequently asked Fitness and Exercise questions.

 
  Reply Create A New Topic
Search the
Message Boards:
Search
  I Liked This Topic Subscribe to this Discussion Share
Add This to My SparkFavorites
Advertisement -- Learn more about ads on this site.

Author: Message: Sort First Post on Top


SPARK_COACH_JEN
SPARK_COACH_JEN's Photo Posts: 54,985
10/7/13 1:38 P

SparkPeople Team Member

SPARK_COACH_JEN's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
M@L has given you a great answer. It's not a scientific formula because there are so many variables involved, just very rough estimates based on some research and looking at what other sites have used.

Sorry I don't have a more specific answer for you!

Coach Jen

"You may have a fresh start any moment you choose, for this thing that we call "failure" is not the falling down but the staying down." Mary Pickford

"No matter how slow you go, you are still lapping everybody on the couch."


MOTIVATED@LAST
MOTIVATED@LAST's Photo Posts: 13,909
10/5/13 6:25 P

MOTIVATED@LAST's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
Yeah, in terms of something that is defensible and backed by research, I'd say the development process was pretty much the a$$-pull method.

I don't think there is all that much behind it other than giving people the warm fuzzies to do the right thing.

M@L

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.


 current weight: 178.0 
 
220
203.5
187
170.5
154


PANFRIEDTROUT
PANFRIEDTROUT's Photo Posts: 3,410
10/5/13 12:35 A

PANFRIEDTROUT's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
thanks for your reply, Motivated

the reason i'm asking is that for the longest time, a lot of Spark members & also the folks who run the site felt that calories weren't something that could be measured as so many variables go into strength training

so .... i'm curious as to how they went about developing this.

If you want to walk on water, you have to get out of the boat. (auth unk)

Time Zone is Pacific Standard (USA)


 Pounds lost: 38.0 
 
0
24
48
72
96


MOTIVATED@LAST
MOTIVATED@LAST's Photo Posts: 13,909
10/5/13 12:23 A

MOTIVATED@LAST's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
I don't think there is much formula about it at all. It doesn't really seem to vary much between large and small muscles, or vary by weight, number of reps, etc.

But one well known study puts the metabolic gain from a regular program of lifting at about 150 calories per day. The very rough calorie estimates from Spark would give you something broadly consistent with this.

I don't think there is much scientific rigour about it, but if it encourages people to take up ST, well, its something I can live with.

M@L

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.


 current weight: 178.0 
 
220
203.5
187
170.5
154


PANFRIEDTROUT
PANFRIEDTROUT's Photo Posts: 3,410
10/4/13 11:56 P

PANFRIEDTROUT's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
Apparently, when you add strength exercises now, it shows how many calories you burned. This is a "feature" many Spark members had asked for.

I'm wondering what formula was used to determine the calorie burn?

If you want to walk on water, you have to get out of the boat. (auth unk)

Time Zone is Pacific Standard (USA)


 Pounds lost: 38.0 
 
0
24
48
72
96


 
Page: 1 of (1)  
Search  

I Liked This Topic Subscribe to this Discussion Share
Add This to My SparkFavorites
Report Innappropriate Post


Thread URL: http://www.sparkpeople.com/myspark/messageboard.asp?imboard=6&imparent=32131979

Review our Community Guidelines



 
Diet Resources: burn fat exercises | fat burn exercises | exercises to burn fat