Advertisement -- Learn more about ads on this site.

 
Message Boards
FORUM:   Fitness and Exercise
TOPIC:  

Calories burned: Map My Run vs. Spark People



Click here to read our frequently asked Fitness and Exercise questions.

 
  Reply Create A New Topic
Search the
Message Boards:
Search
  I Liked This Topic Subscribe to this Discussion Share
Add This to My SparkFavorites
Advertisement -- Learn more about ads on this site.

Author: Message: Sort First Post on Top


CUDA440
CUDA440's Photo SparkPoints: (61,243)
Fitness Minutes: (51,785)
Posts: 7,093
9/26/13 11:46 A

CUDA440's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
I just checked mine numbers to compare

Map my run - 3.1 miles 37 min = 455 calories
SP - Run at 11 min mile, 37 min = 367

Only off about 90 calories. Since I am about at goal, I don't pay too much attention to the numbers. I just get a great workout in at least 5-6 times a week, and watch my food intake.

Beckie

SW July 2005 - 177
Thanksgiving 2005 - found out pregnant 159
July 2006 - 9 months pregnant - 197
3/19/09 - 177. AGAIN!!!
11/23/09 - 170.6



 current weight: 161.4 
 
177
169.75
162.5
155.25
148


MLAN613
SparkPoints: (138,837)
Fitness Minutes: (142,553)
Posts: 9,160
9/26/13 8:15 A

MLAN613's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
The MapMyRun calorie burn inflation is my biggest complaint with it! Actually, it's my only complaint.





MOTIVATED@LAST
MOTIVATED@LAST's Photo Posts: 13,652
9/26/13 6:44 A

MOTIVATED@LAST's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
Yeah, those mapmyrun figures do seem inflated, and they don't pass either of two reality checks.

First, you can expect to burn about 100-120 calories per mile run.

Secondly, most people burn about 6-10 calories per minute on a sustained basis - 6 on the moderate end, 10 on the more vigorous. Somebody who was fit and really pushing themselves might burn 12-13 per minute - figures above this are not really feasible.

760 for 4 miles in 40 minutes.

M@L

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.


 current weight: 178.0 
 
220
203.5
187
170.5
154


MALAMI518
MALAMI518's Photo SparkPoints: (40,133)
Fitness Minutes: (34,345)
Posts: 997
9/26/13 6:32 A

MALAMI518's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
Thank you, all for your insight! I didn't know about putting in distance and time. I'll see if that makes a difference. I may add a HRM to my wish list.

Beth
from Central NYS


 Pounds lost: 125.0 
 
0
31.25
62.5
93.75
125


DASHKATH
Posts: 861
9/26/13 5:22 A

DASHKATH's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
If you put you time and distance in SP it will calculate the correct "selection" for you. Also make sure you have your weight in both SP and MapMyRun. I use both all the time and I get about the same calories burned for both.



SIMONEKP
SIMONEKP's Photo Posts: 2,422
9/24/13 11:40 A

SIMONEKP's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
If possible, consider investing in a HRM, it will be a little more accurate than the estimate on SP and MMR

Simone

"Patience and perseverance have a magical effect before which difficulties disappear and obstacles vanish." - John Quincy Adams

No matter how slow you go, you're still lapping everyone on the couch!
Source: unknown



 current weight: 218.0 
 
295
252.5
210
167.5
125


DRAGONCHILDE
DRAGONCHILDE's Photo SparkPoints: (54,986)
Fitness Minutes: (14,173)
Posts: 9,523
9/23/13 9:39 P



DRAGONCHILDE's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
Yes. A general rule of thumb for most people is around 100 calories per mile burned when walking/running. Obviously, you'll burn a couple more when you are heavier, or run more intensely, but the variance isn't going to be as much as Map My Run appears to be providing you.

Heather
Writer, mother, wife, and breadwinner. I love to run, but running doesn't love me, so I'm switching to my low-impact bike.

I'm not pregnant, just fat: My blog.

fatnotpregnant.blogspot.com/


 current weight: 186.4 
 
211
197
183
169
155


MALAMI518
MALAMI518's Photo SparkPoints: (40,133)
Fitness Minutes: (34,345)
Posts: 997
9/23/13 8:54 P

MALAMI518's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
I don't have a HRM. I've been using Map My Run app to keep track of my walk/jog sessions. It reports a much higher calorie burn than what I get when I use the Fitness Tracker. Any idea which is closer to accurate?

For example, today I recorded two 4 miles sessions. The first was 4 miles in 46:50 and the second was 4 miles in 50:59. Map My Run said 769 calories for the first and 670 calories for the second. I used "Intervals of run/walk or walk/jog: 6 mph or slower" in the tracker. It gave me 378 calories for the first 4 miles and 410 calories for the second. That seems to be a big difference. Is Map My Run really that inflated?

Beth
from Central NYS


 Pounds lost: 125.0 
 
0
31.25
62.5
93.75
125


 
Page: 1 of (1)  
Search  

I Liked This Topic Subscribe to this Discussion Share
Add This to My SparkFavorites
Report Innappropriate Post


Thread URL: http://www.sparkpeople.com/myspark/messageboard.asp?imboard=6&imparent=32050448

Review our Community Guidelines



 
Diet Resources: fitness stability ball | yoga stability ball | stability ball chair