1
 
Author: Sorting First Post on Top ↑ Message:
MOTIVATED@LAST's Photo MOTIVATED@LAST Posts: 14,062
9/9/13 6:27 A

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
I have little faith in Spark's GPS/mapping based calculator - it produces some very weird results. The calculator built into the (non-mapping) fitness tracker seems to produce results that are much more realistic and internally consistent.

M@L

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.


 current weight: 178.0 
 
220
203.5
187
170.5
154
MISSFROSTICLE Posts: 7
9/9/13 2:18 A

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
I went for a run this morning and out of interest decided to run BOTH the Sparkpeople GPS tracker as well as my normal Runkeeper app. When I got home I checked both and was shocked at the calorie burned difference calculated by both apps.

Runkeeper said I burned 347calories while SP said I burned 493calories! The time and speed of the run correlates in both apps and my weight is constant in both apps. All other variables are the same except for the calories burned.

Which app is more accurate? And why is there such a HUGE difference in the calories burned (I could understand a difference of around 50cal but 150cal??????)

Thanks in advance!



 current weight: 129.0 
 
132
129.25
126.5
123.75
121
Page: 1 of (1)  

Report Innappropriate Post

Other Fitness and Exercise Topics:

Topics: Last Post:
How did this happen 7/14/2014 1:25:49 PM
Printable Workouts (vs. DVD/Video usage) 6/28/2014 3:11:59 PM
Bodyrider trainer 3 in 1 7/26/2014 6:20:41 PM
What do you do to put more movements in your day? 9/1/2014 9:25:35 AM
Runners I have a question! 8/5/2014 12:36:31 AM

Thread URL: http://www.sparkpeople.com/myspark/messageboard.asp?imboard=6&imparent=31939453

Review our Community Guidelines





Diet Resources: aromatherapy classes | wholesale aromatherapy | aromatherapy training