Advertisement -- Learn more about ads on this site.

 
Message Boards
FORUM:   Fitness and Exercise
TOPIC:  

Recumbent Bike, Calories burned at 12mph for 1hr



Click here to read our frequently asked Fitness and Exercise questions.

 
  Reply Create A New Topic
Search the
Message Boards:
Search
  I Liked This Topic Subscribe to this Discussion Share
Add This to My SparkFavorites
Advertisement -- Learn more about ads on this site.

Author: Message: Sort First Post on Top


MOTIVATED@LAST
MOTIVATED@LAST's Photo Posts: 13,664
6/26/13 8:07 P

MOTIVATED@LAST's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
Spark's calorie calculator assumes that calorie burn is proportionate to body weight. This holds true for many forms of exercise (eg. running, walking, aerobics), but for things like a recumbent bike, you are working against the resistance of the machine, rather than your bodyweight. This can lead Spark to overestimate the calorie burn for stationary cycling, especially for heavier people.

If you were using a low resistance setting, 300 sounds more reasonable. 800 calories is about the limit of what a very fit person working extremely hard may be able to burn in 1 hour - figures above this range should be regarded with great suspicion. 300-600 cal/hour is more realistic for most people.

M@L

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.


 current weight: 178.0 
 
220
203.5
187
170.5
154


-CORAL-
-CORAL-'s Photo SparkPoints: (34,408)
Fitness Minutes: (29,723)
Posts: 2,167
6/26/13 2:38 P

-CORAL-'s SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
You should try to estimate calorie burn based on how hard you were working in this instance. If you were pedaling at a high resistance, going all out, sweating and breathing hard for an hour with a high heart rate, maybe it could get to 800 but it would be very difficult. However if you were going at a more moderate resistance, heart rate and breathing moderately such as maybe taking a fast walk, it is more likely to be around 400 in an hour.

Coral in Portland, OR


 current weight: 162.4 
 
167
160.25
153.5
146.75
140


WADINGMOOSE
WADINGMOOSE's Photo Posts: 1,044
6/26/13 1:42 P

WADINGMOOSE's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
I tend to go with the lower of the two numbers - seems a better idea than overestimating calories burned. The piece of fitness equipment also knows what resistance you've set throughout the ride, where the SP numbers are an average and would include things like wind resistance as if you were biking outside.





 current weight: 235.0 
 
252
245.25
238.5
231.75
225


LYNTORAL
LYNTORAL's Photo Posts: 36
6/26/13 12:54 P

LYNTORAL's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
I can't believe the exercise tracker is right when it says I burned over 800 calories at 12mph for 1 hour. My bike says it's more in the 300 range. Does anyone have a clue?



 current weight: 260.0 
 
365
309
253
197
141


 
Page: 1 of (1)  
Search  

I Liked This Topic Subscribe to this Discussion Share
Add This to My SparkFavorites
Report Innappropriate Post


Thread URL: http://www.sparkpeople.com/myspark/messageboard.asp?imboard=6&imparent=31344383

Review our Community Guidelines



 
Diet Resources: new balance cross training shoes | cross country skiing training | cross training elliptical