Advertisement -- Learn more about ads on this site.

 
Message Boards
FORUM:   Fitness and Exercise
TOPIC:  

Calories burned: treadmill vs SP discrepancy



Click here to read our frequently asked Fitness and Exercise questions.

 
  Reply Create A New Topic
Search the
Message Boards:
Search
  I Liked This Topic Subscribe to this Discussion Share
Add This to My SparkFavorites
Advertisement -- Learn more about ads on this site.

Author: Message: Sort First Post on Top


MOTIVATED@LAST
MOTIVATED@LAST's Photo Posts: 13,647
5/17/13 10:43 P

MOTIVATED@LAST's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
Total distance covered is the major factor in how many calories you burn.

There is no information in your post about speed (or by implication, distance covered). As a slow running speed, 300ish calories could be feasible. At a faster running speed (and thus more distance covered) 400 calories could also be feasible.

Walking and running are pretty well studied activities, and online calculators tend to be fairly reliable for these. HRM's come into their own for activities where it is hard to objectively judge the intensity. This doesn't apply to walking or running.

M@L

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.


 current weight: 178.0 
 
220
203.5
187
170.5
154


UNIDENT
UNIDENT's Photo Posts: 33,498
5/16/13 3:26 P

UNIDENT's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
Exercise is typically 6-8 cals per minute, regardless of size.

So for 10 (400 for 40 minutes) that would have to have been very intense exercise. The 10 minutes of walking wasn't, right? So we know that's unlikely.

If we assumed 10 mins at 6cpm and 30 mins at 8cpm that's exactly 300 - just on that "hundred less than that".

So I would say Spark is pretty reliable.

Deb, in New Zealand


SPARK_COACH_JEN
SPARK_COACH_JEN's Photo Posts: 54,075
5/16/13 10:21 A

SparkPeople Team Member

SPARK_COACH_JEN's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
Machines tend to overestimate calories burned, sometimes by as much as 30%. Here's an Ask the Expert with more info about this:

www.sparkpeople.com/community/ask_the_expe
rts.asp?q=57


Hope that helps,

Coach Jen

"You may have a fresh start any moment you choose, for this thing that we call "failure" is not the falling down but the staying down." Mary Pickford


LEC358
SparkPoints: (8,107)
Fitness Minutes: (6,540)
Posts: 1,694
5/16/13 10:03 A

Send Private Message
Reply
The only way to be mostly sure is a heart rate monitor. I use the rule of thumb of 100 calories/mile and just track it manually.



 current weight: -0.8  under
 
5
2.5
0
-2.5
-5


JANEY102482
JANEY102482's Photo Posts: 381
5/16/13 9:51 A

Send Private Message
Reply
The treadmill at my gym tells me I burn about 400 calories for 10 minutes of walking and 30 minutes of running. The SP tracker tells me I burn over 100 calories less than that. Which one is accurate?



 Pounds lost: 28.6 
 
0
8.75
17.5
26.25
35


 
Page: 1 of (1)  
Search  

I Liked This Topic Subscribe to this Discussion Share
Add This to My SparkFavorites
Report Innappropriate Post


Thread URL: http://www.sparkpeople.com/myspark/messageboard.asp?imboard=6&imparent=31009195

Review our Community Guidelines



 
Diet Resources: schwinn elliptical trainer | e trainer elliptical | nordictrack elliptical trainer