Advertisement -- Learn more about ads on this site.

Message Boards
FORUM:   Fitness and Exercise

Working out on a Tony Little Gazelle Edge---HELP

Click here to read our frequently asked Fitness and Exercise questions.

  Reply Create A New Topic
Search the
Message Boards:
  I Liked This Topic Subscribe to this Discussion Share
Add This to My SparkFavorites
Advertisement -- Learn more about ads on this site.

Author: Message: Sort First Post on Top

DRAGONCHILDE's Photo SparkPoints: (54,986)
Fitness Minutes: (14,173)
Posts: 9,523
5/6/13 6:20 P

Send Private Message
I'm going to guess that's quite an overestimate. When walking on regular ground (without machine assistance) you can go safely with about 100 calories per mile. Walking 4 miles would be 400 calories, give or take. Since this is a lower impact exercise, and would consequently burn less calories, I'm going to guess that saying 125 calories per mile is a bit overly ambitious a statement. Exercise machines can overestimate as much as 30%!

Why not invest in a heart rate monitor with a chest strap? That would be the easiest way to get a good estimate of your expenditure.

Edited by: DRAGONCHILDE at: 5/6/2013 (18:21)
Writer, mother, wife, and breadwinner. I love to run, but running doesn't love me, so I'm switching to my low-impact bike.

I'm not pregnant, just fat: My blog.

 current weight: 186.4 

ANTIQUEGMA's Photo Posts: 1,111
5/6/13 5:42 P

Send Private Message
I won't get into pros and cons of the Gazelle. I have two bad knees and this is low impact and works great for me. I am down 48# from my heaviest weight and 30# of that has been this past year. First of all, I own The Gazelle Edge, just bells and whistles. When it is working right it keeps track of speed, distance, time and calories burned. When I first worked out on one years ago I did a mile in 12 min. Over the years I have slowed down. Right before the computer fizzled out I was walking a mile in 18-20 min. When I joined Spark last year I started working out on a regular basis. My problem is the "computer" doesn't keep accurate measurements. The only thing that is close to accurate is the time it takes. When I first worked out it would say I was burning approx. 125 calories for walking a mile. So now I am wondering how close that is to being right. Since the speed and distance is wrong...I just walk 20 min. and call it 1 mile. I walk 4 miles a day and thought if I am walking 28 miles a week that is 3500 calories. 125 x 28 = 3500 (This is to burn off 1# a week by walking)

BUT, how close are the calories? ANYONE KNOW???? Fatburn website says 152 calories for 160# person. I received an e-mail from someone from the company that says 85. That's a difference of 67. That doesn't sound right at all. If that is the case I will have to walk close to 6 miles a day. 85 x 42 miles = 3570 calories .....but according to Fatburn website I would only have to walk 23 miles x152 = 3496 calories

Thanks for listening

Note: I reset my goals 3 weeks ago and since then only have lost 1#

Edited by: ANTIQUEGMA at: 5/6/2013 (17:43)
No matter how slow you are miles ahead of those sitting on the couch!

 Pounds lost: 1.5 

Page: 1 of (1)  

I Liked This Topic Subscribe to this Discussion Share
Add This to My SparkFavorites
Report Innappropriate Post

Thread URL:

Review our Community Guidelines

Diet Resources: the worst food you can eat | worst food you can eat | worst junk food