Advertisement -- Learn more about ads on this site.

 
Message Boards
FORUM:   Fitness and Exercise
TOPIC:  

Working out on a Tony Little Gazelle Edge---HELP



Click here to read our frequently asked Fitness and Exercise questions.

 
  Reply Create A New Topic
Search the
Message Boards:
Search
  I Liked This Topic Subscribe to this Discussion Share
Add This to My SparkFavorites
Advertisement -- Learn more about ads on this site.

Author: Message: Sort First Post on Top


DRAGONCHILDE
DRAGONCHILDE's Photo SparkPoints: (54,986)
Fitness Minutes: (14,173)
Posts: 9,523
5/6/13 6:20 P



DRAGONCHILDE's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
I'm going to guess that's quite an overestimate. When walking on regular ground (without machine assistance) you can go safely with about 100 calories per mile. Walking 4 miles would be 400 calories, give or take. Since this is a lower impact exercise, and would consequently burn less calories, I'm going to guess that saying 125 calories per mile is a bit overly ambitious a statement. Exercise machines can overestimate as much as 30%!

Why not invest in a heart rate monitor with a chest strap? That would be the easiest way to get a good estimate of your expenditure.

Edited by: DRAGONCHILDE at: 5/6/2013 (18:21)
Heather
Writer, mother, wife, and breadwinner. I love to run, but running doesn't love me, so I'm switching to my low-impact bike.

I'm not pregnant, just fat: My blog.

fatnotpregnant.blogspot.com/


 current weight: 186.4 
 
211
197
183
169
155


ANTIQUEGMA
ANTIQUEGMA's Photo Posts: 1,111
5/6/13 5:42 P

ANTIQUEGMA's SparkPage
Send Private Message
Reply
I won't get into pros and cons of the Gazelle. I have two bad knees and this is low impact and works great for me. I am down 48# from my heaviest weight and 30# of that has been this past year. First of all, I own The Gazelle Edge, just simple..no bells and whistles. When it is working right it keeps track of speed, distance, time and calories burned. When I first worked out on one years ago I did a mile in 12 min. Over the years I have slowed down. Right before the computer fizzled out I was walking a mile in 18-20 min. When I joined Spark last year I started working out on a regular basis. My problem is the "computer" doesn't keep accurate measurements. The only thing that is close to accurate is the time it takes. When I first worked out it would say I was burning approx. 125 calories for walking a mile. So now I am wondering how close that is to being right. Since the speed and distance is wrong...I just walk 20 min. and call it 1 mile. I walk 4 miles a day and thought if I am walking 28 miles a week that is 3500 calories. 125 x 28 = 3500 (This is to burn off 1# a week by walking)

BUT, how close are the calories? ANYONE KNOW???? Fatburn website says 152 calories for 160# person. I received an e-mail from someone from the company that says 85. That's a difference of 67. That doesn't sound right at all. If that is the case I will have to walk close to 6 miles a day. 85 x 42 miles = 3570 calories .....but according to Fatburn website I would only have to walk 23 miles x152 = 3496 calories

Thanks for listening

Note: I reset my goals 3 weeks ago and since then only have lost 1#

Edited by: ANTIQUEGMA at: 5/6/2013 (17:43)
No matter how slow you go...you are miles ahead of those sitting on the couch!


 Pounds lost: 1.5 
 
0
8.25
16.5
24.75
33


 
Page: 1 of (1)  
Search  

I Liked This Topic Subscribe to this Discussion Share
Add This to My SparkFavorites
Report Innappropriate Post


Thread URL: http://www.sparkpeople.com/myspark/messageboard.asp?imboard=6&imparent=30929283

Review our Community Guidelines



 
Diet Resources: the worst food you can eat | worst food you can eat | worst junk food