Advertisement -- Learn more about ads on this site.
BUNNYLAMB
50,000-59,999 SparkPoints 52,400
SparkPoints
 

Fitbit, Nutrition goals, and a Plateau

Thursday, August 15, 2013

I went to sleep last night feeling a bit guilty about my recent performance in terms of eating well, and a weight plateau for the last few weeks to match.

I bought a Fitbit right around the time that Sparkpeople introduced the ability to integrate your calories burned through exercise into your nutritional goals. I thought it was great--both of these things combined to create a more accurate picture of what I was really taking in and burning off. I am also motivated by any new tracking gimmick in my life!

Before these two things came into my life, I was sticking to my SP calorie range (for the most part), no matter what exercise I was putting in, and I was seeing a steady 1 - 1.5 lb per week loss from that method. I wasn't hungry (most days), and I ate all over the place within my range. I didn't much account for the exercise I was doing in my eating goals, since it was not often intense calorie-burning, mostly a lot of walking and toning.

Since I started tracking my steps I feel like I'm being tricked into believing I'm exercising more than I was before, when not much has changed. It's kind of amazing how much we tend to trust numbers on a page, even when our common sense is trying to tell us we know better!

In addition, my SP calorie range already incorporates whatever non-exercise steps I take in my mostly sedentary lifestyle (outside of actual excercise) so when the range is adjusted based on each step tracked on my fitbit, it's going quite high*.

So, although technically I am eating within my new daily fitness-integrated calorie range, the bottom line is:

Before: average about 17 miles/week and 1375 calories/day = success
Since: average about 17 miles/week and 1800 calories/day = plateau

So... yeah. Seems pretty clear to me!

I've switched back to the old nutrition tracker, which I hope will help keep me closer to what I think my true range should be (1300 - 1500). Here's to hoping I am able to adjust!



*--There is a problem with the relationship between fitbit and Sparkpeople in that SP is overstating the calories burned on the fitbit fitness entry.
Share This Post With Others
Member Comments About This Blog Post
  • BUNNYLAMB
    Hm... good luck figuring it out, MFaber3, and let me know what you learn! Bodies are such particular things... I know protein, sodium and water intake have also had an effect on whether I lose or not too; sometimes it's not just the basic equation of calories in vs. calories out. Maybe some science experiments are needed ;)
    1137 days ago
  • MFABER3
    Funny, I'm wondering about the FITBIT vs Calorie tracking too. My problem is I've been on the plauteu for so long, even before I changed to the new SP setting.

    I'm wondering if I should be eating closer to what the new numbers are and not the stated resting range.
    1137 days ago
  • Add Your Comment to the Blog Post

    Log in to post a comment


    Disclaimer: Weight loss results will vary from person to person. No individual result should be seen as a typical result of following the SparkPeople program.