Advertisement -- Learn more about ads on this site.


    AMANDANCES   31,626
SparkPoints
30,000-39,999 SparkPoints
 
 
REMEMBER: Calorie deficit doesn't always equal fat loss

Wednesday, July 31, 2013

QUOTED FROM FITBIT COMMUNITY:

"So many folks have posted information on MFP about whether to eat their exercise calories or not, and I provided my answer but never previously provided the WHY behind my approach. I hope this information helps answer that question in part, but the other question it addresses is whether the simple "calories in versus calories out" and "3500 calories = one pound" tenets are universally accurate.

Many others, myself included, have touted the 3500 calories = one pound calculation, which is the accepted general rule, but out of good faith, I am adding one big caveat. My guidance is based on recent findings published in the International Journal of Obesity (http://www.nature.com/ijo/jou
rnal/v32/n3/abs/0803720a.h
tml).

The short of this new (2010) research teaches us that while 3500 calories to lose a pound has always been the rule of thumb, this figure stems from research which (incorrectly) assumed that all the weight lost would be adipose tissue (which would be ideal, of course).

So, first of all, yes one pound of FAT = 3500 calories.

Here's where the caveat comes in. Because lean body mass is lost along with body fat, researchers now know the 3500 calorie figure is, for many, an oversimplification. The amount of lean body mass you will lose is based on your initial body fat level and size of your daily calorie deficit. Lean people tend to lose more lean body mass and retain more fat. Obese/overweight individuals tend to lose more body fat and retain more lean tissue (this explains why obese people can tolerate extremely low calorie diets better than already lean people, and why lean folks (close to their goal weights) have a devil of a time losing the last few pounds and need to be extra aware that they need to avoid an ultra low calorie approach to losing those pounds). Very aggressive low calorie diets erode lean body mass to a greater degree than more conservative diets. Whether you are losing lean or fat, tells you what is the required energy deficit per unit of weight loss is for you.

The metabolizable energy in fat is different than the metabolizable eneregy in muscle tissue. A pound of muscle is not 3500 calories. A pound of muscle yields about 600 calories. If you lose lean body mass then you lose more weight than if you lose fat. If you create a 3500 calorie deficit in one week and you lose 100% body fat, you will lose one pound. BUT if you create a 3500 calorie weekly deficit and as a result of that deficit, lose 100% muscle, you would lose approximately 6 pounds of body weight (a very bad thing).

If you have a high initial body fat percentage, then you are going to lose more fat relative to lean, so you will need a larger deficit to lose the same amount of weight as compared to a lean person. That means that eating at a lower calorie level will work better for you than for a relatively lean individual.

Creating a calorie deficit once at the beginning of a diet (e.g., a 750 calorie deficit per day) and maintaining that same caloric intake for the duration of the diet and after major weight loss fails to account for how your body decreases energy expenditure with reduced body weight. Your dietary needs will change as you lose weight. As you get lighter, your daily caloric need will diminish as will your body's ability to tolerate a too low calorie intake (consequence? you'll begin to lose more lean and hang onto the fat, thereby getting lighter but "fatter").

Weight loss typically slows down over time for a prescribed constant diet (we call this a "plateau"). This is either due to the decreased metabolism mentioned above, or a relaxing of the diet compliance, or both (most of us can't stick to excessive calorie reductions for long). Progressive resistance training and adequate caloric intake can modify the proportion of weight lost from body fat vs lean tissue.

So ... should you throw out the old calorie formulas? Not necessarily. You can still use the standard calorie formulas to figure out how much you should eat, and you can use a 500-1000 calorie per day deficit (below maintenance) as a generic guideline to figure where to set your calories to lose one or two pounds per week respectively (at least on paper anyway).

Even better however, you could use this info to fine tune your caloric deficit using a percentage method and also base your deficit on your starting body fat level, to get a much more personalized and effective approach:
15-20% below maintenance calories = conservative deficit
20-25% below maintenance calories = moderate deficit
25-30% below maintenance calories = aggressive deficit
31-40% below maintenance calories = very aggressive deficit (risky)
50%+ below maintenance calories = semi starvation/starvation (potentially dangerous and unhealthy)

(Note: According to exercise physiologists Katch & Mcardle, the average female between the ages of 23 and 50 has a maintenance level of about 2000-2100 calories per day and the average male about 2700-2900 calories per day)

A conservative deficit of around 15-20% below maintenance is often appropriate, especially for non-obese individuals.

In a nutshell, Dr. Hall’s research tells us that there are big differences between lean and overweight people in how many calories they can or should cut. If you are obese/significantly overweight, dramatic deficits will still result in a high (and desirable) ratio of fat loss to lean loss. If you are lighter, then you must pay more attention to being sure your calorie consumption doesn't drop too low. Be aware of where you are on this curve, and adjust as you make progress toward your healthy weight and body composition goal."
SHARE
  Member Comments About This Blog Post:

MISSUSRIVERRAT 6/16/2014 9:11AM

    Great info. I needed this right now. Thanks for sharing!!

Report Inappropriate Comment
WORKOUTWITHPAM 8/1/2013 2:14PM

    Pretty deep, but thanks for sharing.

HUGS
Pam

Report Inappropriate Comment
RUNNINGAL425 8/1/2013 12:31PM

    Thanks!

I have way upped my exercise minutes and cut down on my calories and am still sitting at the same scale point. I am not that far from my goal (considering I have already lost 138 lbs) and cannot seem to do ANYTHING to get the scale to move lower. I am having a hard time not getting discouraged. I'll just keep truckin......

Report Inappropriate Comment
NOSNACKER-57 8/1/2013 5:26AM

    Mmm wonder how to determine the right maintenance calories as I know we are all different, they say 2000-2100, but that may be too high for me, but I'm willing to give it a try using the 2000 maintenance as my starting point.

So basically 1600 calories for conservative; 1500 for moderate, 1400 aggressive deficits...using the higher %.

Oh ya, what if one exercises? Would we add calories?

Thanks for sharing.



Comment edited on: 8/1/2013 6:44:47 AM

Report Inappropriate Comment
LIVE2RUN4LIFE 8/1/2013 12:57AM

    Or do resistance training to preserve the lean tissue.

Report Inappropriate Comment
GETUP-N-GOGIRL 8/1/2013 12:24AM

    emoticon

Report Inappropriate Comment
ABAKER34 7/31/2013 2:42PM

    Thanks so much for the information, very good stuff to know!

Report Inappropriate Comment
NEWFLABULESS 7/31/2013 12:14PM

    Thank you for the information!

Report Inappropriate Comment
TIGER_LILY_613 7/31/2013 11:30AM

    Thanks for posting this.

Report Inappropriate Comment
USMAWIFE 7/31/2013 11:03AM

    thanks. read it on the fit bit page

Report Inappropriate Comment
AMANDANCES 7/31/2013 10:25AM

    I think I'm probably starting to reach one of those plateau moments the author mentions, and I think I'm going to start adding in some heavier weights and working for a little bit longer. There's only so much cardio I can do before I get exhausted, but I think I can increase the intensity of my weight training sessions without feeling completely spent.

I'm glad this was helpful to people!

Report Inappropriate Comment
BREWMASTERBILL 7/31/2013 9:54AM

    Well done. In a nutshell, the body pulls stored energy from the most available source. If fat is abundant, it is preferred, in leaner folks, lean mass may be preferred.

"Progressive resistance training and adequate caloric intake can modify the proportion of weight lost from body fat vs lean tissue. "

This is a huge point that I find is neglected (especially the progressive part)

Another big influence on lean mass retention is adequate protein intake. This is roughly 1g/lb every day. This is dramatically more than the recommendations at SP.

Report Inappropriate Comment
TATTER3 7/31/2013 9:45AM

    this is absolutely excellent information. thanks

Report Inappropriate Comment
SPARKLINGHOPE 7/31/2013 9:44AM

    Great discussion material. Good info. Thanks for sharing.

Report Inappropriate Comment
KOMTRIA 7/31/2013 9:34AM

  I read this too and think this is really important information.
Glad you shared it for the community at large.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Add Your Comment to the Blog Post


Log in to post a comment.
 


Other Entries by AMANDANCES