Advertisement -- Learn more about ads on this site.


    NELLJONES   188,157
SparkPoints
100,000 or more SparkPoints
 
 
Children, parents, meals and discipline

Saturday, February 04, 2012

There is a wonderful article today in the Wall Street Journal's Review section about "Why French Parents are Superior". We can all debate that, of course, but one of the points that struck me is that children are taught from birth the concept of delayed gratification. The example they gave was food and meals. Here in America people graze all day long. Hungry? Bored? Eat something. In France you eat 3 times a day, and children have a snack at about 4 or 4:30. Period. Nothing in between. My husband's first wife was French, and my step son, whom I have known since he was a teen, never ate between meals. He would be bouncing on his feet moaning "hurry up" while I was making dinner, but it never occurred to him to snack. He is pushing 50 now and has two kids of his own, and he has raised them the same way. Just that one aspect of "delayed gratification" has worked its way into all his life. We all have heard about French women not being fat and have examined their food for the "secret", but no one ever mentioned that the culture doesn't involve snacking. I love the story I read about Euro-Disney when it first opened. Disney had designed their food vendors the same way we see them here, but in France, the vendors were empty between meals and overwhelmed at meal times. They actually had to "educate" people to eat like Americans when at the park just so there would be the capacity to feed them.

I was raised not to snack, but I let that "after school snack" get WAY out of hand, and got fat. When I got to Weight Watchers in 1970, snacks weren't part of the meal plan; maybe you broke lunch into two parts an hour or so apart, but the emphasis was in getting to the next meal without snacking. It's the old "delayed gratification" thing.

To this day I do not snack. There is no "snack food" in my house. I have three planned meals each day, and I make sure to eat enough at each one (according to my plan) to get me through to the next. That's how I raised my own kids, although it was primarily because I couldn't afford to give them food outside of meals. I had no idea I was teaching them to accept delayed gratification, but I guess I was.

Maybe that's why I have no trouble putting off purchases until (or if) I can afford them. I can wait until everyone gets here on Christmas afternoon to open gifts. I had no idea that waiting until meals to eat would have such a big (although unattributed) affect.

If you can get your hands on the Feb 4 Wall Street Journal (they charge for online or I'd link it), it's very interesting.
SHARE
  Member Comments About This Blog Post:

VADAVICTORIA 2/11/2012 9:41AM

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100
0142405297020474090457719693145
7473816.html - here's the link!

Report Inappropriate Comment
DARLENEK04 2/9/2012 6:04PM

  I found this interesting....I hear a lot of arguments both
ways, but for me, I eat 3 meals a day.

Darlene

Report Inappropriate Comment
SIMPLY-EVA 2/7/2012 1:51PM

  I wish this is something that I had been taught growing up. I grew up as the youngest child and my sibs were pretty much grown. We spent a lot of time at church and snacks were always available to keep me occupied while mom was busy in meetings. I in turn always turn to food in times of stress or boredom. Its a hard habit to break. These days I chew a lot of gum in hopes that keeping my mouth busy will keep me from putting other things into it. Yup, Ive got a lot to learn and a long way to go but Im finally "getting it".

E

Report Inappropriate Comment
NWCOUNTRYDANCER 2/6/2012 2:40PM

    Very intersting perspective. Thanks for sharing.

Report Inappropriate Comment
ZUCCHINIQUEEN 2/5/2012 6:06AM

    What a new thought, Nell!
I know tht I do better at losing weight when I have "3 squares", but I never knew why!
This is a life-changing thought!

Report Inappropriate Comment
BANKER-CHUCK 2/4/2012 11:08PM

    After reading numerous articles in Spark and other outside material I don't agree with the French schedule of eating. While trying to lose weight I eat 3 main meals and 2 to 3 smaller ones. As a diabetic, type 2, it is suggested I eat every 3 to 4 hours. Over the last 1.5 years I lost over 60 lbs. However I did fall off the wagon and reintroduced foods back into my diet. Mainly backed good, ice cream....you know the bad stuff.

Report Inappropriate Comment
FISHINGLADY66 2/4/2012 8:17PM

    Great Blog Nell.

Report Inappropriate Comment
FREELADY 2/4/2012 7:16PM

    Wow, great blog. So fascinating.

Most libraries have a computer with a subscription service where you can read the article. Thanks for pointing it out to us!

Report Inappropriate Comment
KALISWALKER 2/4/2012 7:15PM

    I enjoyed your blogged. Delayed gratification is also important with personal finances - saving to buy something, rather than running up the credit card.

Report Inappropriate Comment
CATLADY52 2/4/2012 7:00PM

    That's a very interesting concept. emoticon
More people ought to try the French Way.

Report Inappropriate Comment
KENTUCKYWOMAN 2/4/2012 6:36PM

    Snacking always ends up going right into the next meal for me. I totally understand why snacking should not be taught to children.
Thanks for the insight.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Add Your Comment to the Blog Post


Log in to post a comment.