Advertisement -- Learn more about ads on this site.


    4A-HEALTHY-BMI   39,012
SparkPoints
30,000-39,999 SparkPoints
 
 
Wondering how to define “weight maintenance?” Researchers do too

Sunday, June 26, 2011

While Russ gets the wekeepitoff.com site back up and running, I'm going to repost my columns from there on my blog here so I can refer to them when I need to.

Wondering how to define “weight maintenance?” Researchers do too

BY ANGELA BALDO – MARCH 16, 2010
POSTED IN: ANGELA BALDO, AUTHORS, LIFE POST FAT PANTS, UNDERSTANDING MAINTENANCE RESEARCH, WHAT IS MAINTENANCE?

Maintenance isn’t always what you think it is, scientifically. What you see in all the success stories is skinny people, folks that lost weight and presumably stayed there. But the research doesn’t necessarily define maintenance that way, or even stick to one prevailing idea.

So if you’re confused about what’s actually “maintaining,” don’t worry. What we’re trying to say is, “Look, not only do you not have a universal definition of maintenance, nobody does.”

One of the problems with interpreting the scientific literature in weight management is that the working definitions of “successful maintenance” may not match our own notions. And even worse, the definitions are not consistent from one study to the next, even sometimes in papers from the same research group!

Defining “Maintenance”

No matter the differences, every definition contains two basic parameters:

- The amount of weight lost
- The amount of time the weight was kept off

From a range of scientific studies, here are a few different interpretations:

Keeping at least 5% of their body weight off for 15 years
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub
med/10702760


Keeping 30 lbs. off for a minimum of one year
www.nwcr.ws/

Staying within 5 lbs of goal weight for one year
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.
gov/pubmed/10224727


Keeping off at least 10% of the starting body weight for one year
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub
med/11375440


Maintenance can be measured in terms of the original maximum weight or the lowest weight ever achieved, or both. I selected a few studies from my collection to provide some examples. The 2000 paper I mentioned in my previous column defined successful maintenance as keeping at least 5 percent of weight off for 15 years. As I mentioned earlier, roughly 6 percent of the subjects accomplished that. The data from this study span 1975 – 1990.

In 1993, the National Weight Control Registry (NWCR) began with a different definition. To participate in the program, you must keep 30 lbs. off for a minimum of a year. To participate in the Registry at all, that’s still true today.

But even then, individual studies from the NWCR use different definitions of “success.” A 1999 NWCR paper defined “successful maintenance” as staying within 5 lbs of goal weight for one year. This is what I think of when I say “maintenance,” and I’m fairly certain it’s a common idea.

This changed in 2001. Since then, NWCR publications frequently define successful weight loss maintenance as keeping off at least 10% of the starting body weight. This amount of weight lost will not usually take someone from obese to non-obese status.

They use this definition because it’s rare for many obese people to achieve a healthy BMI, what they called “weight normalization” in this paper.

So the NWCR scaled back the definition to mean a loss that is more modest in terms of actual pounds (10%) but still significant in terms of health benefits.

With the definition also comes the caveat that research draws a distinction between whether the maintenance was intentional or the result of illness.

Without a consistent definition of maintenance in the scientific literature, it makes determining your own idea of maintenance that much more confusing. Some studies consider the lowest weight within any time point between the lowest weight and now, even if it has been regained. Others consider regain between the lowest weight and now as unsuccessful maintenance, even if the subject lost the weight again later. When you actually take the second data point is significant with a process like weight management, where fluctuations are common.

Even with all of the differences between our personal definitions of “successful” maintenance and between those in various scientific studies, these are the best data we have, so we will use them. When I summarize papers in this column I will attempt to clarify the specific working definition of maintenance for each study.

But the bottom line is you’re weight’s always going to creep up. You just have to keep pushing it down. We have to do the best we can with whatever information is available. Strategies that help people keep 10 percent of their weight off presumably will help me keep 54 percent of my weight off. At least that’s my hope.

-----------

More blog posts about maintenance definitions:

Familiar faces from Biggest Loser illustrate how wildly maintenance definitions vary
www.sparkpeople.c
om/mypage_public_journal_i
ndividual.asp?blog_id=4326080


Weight Maintenance Definitions, Revisited
www.sparkpeople.c
om/mypage_public_journal_i
ndividual.asp?blog_id=4924102
SHARE
  Member Comments About This Blog Post:

MYSTERY-LADY1 8/1/2012 9:23PM

    emoticon

Report Inappropriate Comment
WATERMELLEN 6/29/2011 10:32PM

    I like the Judith S Beck approach to differentiating between lowest achievable weight and lowest sustainable weight (in "The Diet Solution").

Haven't yet figured out my lowest sustainable weight . . . working on that.

But know for sure: I want to keep a mid number 3. Yeah!!

Report Inappropriate Comment
KAYOTIC 6/27/2011 9:12AM

    It is interesting how many different ways there are to define "maintenance" when it comes to weight loss. For me I've picked a "goal weight" and try to keep within 5 lbs of that, and have been fairly successful at that for the past 5 years. I do go over now and again, but not drastically so, so even with those blips I feel like my maintenance has been a success.

And even though you don't like the "keep doing what you did to lose" phrase when it comes to maintenance, I must confess to using this myself. I really believe in the "lifestyle change" aspect, and so do advice folks in the loss phase to find a maintainable option, that is, no crazy "I'll just do this to lose 10, 20, 50, 100 lbs, and then go back to eating my regular diet. I believe to truly maintain a weight loss a person has to be willing to change those eating habits.

Report Inappropriate Comment
BLVINBUTTERFLYS 6/26/2011 10:04PM

    nice!

Report Inappropriate Comment
JENNSWIMS 6/26/2011 12:33PM

    I really enjoy the scientific and less emotional looks at the science of weight loss. Thank you.

Report Inappropriate Comment
CASSIES 6/26/2011 10:37AM

    Thanks for your bottom line and sharing this info.

Report Inappropriate Comment
NOMUFFINTOP3 6/26/2011 8:19AM

   

Food for thought!

Report Inappropriate Comment
SANSANDY1 6/26/2011 7:24AM

    emoticon

Report Inappropriate Comment

Add Your Comment to the Blog Post


Log in to post a comment.