Advertisement -- Learn more about ads on this site.


    UNIDENT   48,427
SparkPoints
40,000-49,999 SparkPoints
 
 

Calories Burned - How my treadmill does it


Tuesday, June 14, 2011

People often ask about the variation between treadmill (or other machine) reported calorie burn, and spark reported calorie burn. Some of the typical responses include "Your treadmill knows how hard you worked" or "The treadmill treats everyone as a 150lb man".

So I did some experimentation on the STEX treadmill in my gym, to see exactly what variables it uses when reporting the calorie burn figure.

Each of these workouts is five minutes long and each pair isolates just one variable, to see if the machine uses that.

WEIGHT

Two identical workouts were programmed in. Throughout both I maintained the same average HR of 133 bpm. Therefore the only difference is the weight that I entered on the machine before starting.

At 60kg (132lbs) it told me I'd burned 26 calories
At 90kg (198lbs) it told me I'd burned 41 calories

This treadmill uses the weight you've entered in showing how many calories you burned. It does not program calorie burn for everyone as if you're a 150lb man.

INTENSITY

Abolishing the Heart Rate Monitor so the machine had no feedback on heart rate, and using a manual 'quick start' setting to go without entering a user's weight, the following two workouts were performed:

Low: 5kph (3.1mph) with 0% incline
High: 7ph (4.3mph) with 6% incline

The variable factor here is "how hard it was". This is the "your treadmill knows how hard you worked out" factor.

Low: 17 calories
High: 41 calories

Yep, this treadmill knows how hard I worked out. It uses the intensity settings in determining calorie burn.

HEART RATE

For two identical workouts (same as first set) programmed into the machine, and no setting for weight at all, it was given my actual HR (average 133) while performing the workout, and my HR while standing next to the machine doing nothing. While standing, because I had just worked out, my HR started at about 130, was 115 by 2 mins, and down to 105 by 4 mins.

The variable here is HR. If the treadmill is using my physical effort as measured by my HR in determining calorie burn we'll see a lower burn on the standing workout.

Working: 27 cals
Standing: 27 cals

On this one, it's a fail. It does not use the person's HR to determine calorie burn. It presumably only reports it to keep you in the "fat burning zone" or whatever you have chosen when you use those settings. It does not figure into the calories burned equation.

BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE

Notice that the final workout, where I actually worked, that is, is identical to the original one where weight was entered. The same workout pattern was performed, the same HR maintained. It's interesting to note that the machine gave me the same calorie burn (with no information on my actual weight) as for a 60kg person. It's particularly interesting because I weigh 90kg.

In other words, if I don't tell this machine what I weigh, it's assuming it's around 60kg. If I wanted to use the calories burned figure from this machine, I would certainly be best served by ensuring I input my actual weight, not just hit Quick Start and go.
SHARE

Member Comments About This Blog Post:
GEWALKER 6/27/2011 9:33AM

    Cool information. Would you recommend a heart rate monitor if someone wants to maintain a good dataset on their cardio work?

Report Inappropriate Comment
SMARGED 6/22/2011 4:57PM

    Very interesting! I've often asked myself the same thing. Thanks not only for sharing, but for the time and energy invested in making those tests!!

Report Inappropriate Comment
CHICKYMAMA 6/16/2011 6:33PM

    Good info :) Thanks for sharing!

Report Inappropriate Comment

Add Your Comment to the Blog Post


Log in to post a comment.
 


Other Entries by UNIDENT