Advertisement -- Learn more about ads on this site.
RAYLINSTEPHENS
200,000-249,999 SparkPoints 245,076
SparkPoints
 

Just an example of different weights and BMR

Monday, August 16, 2010

My sister gave me the best advice when she told me not to think of a number but to go as low as my body can handle.

There isn't much difference in the BMR for even 10-20 lbs. Here is an example for my 58 years at 61.5 inches.

115 - 1405
120 - 1432
125 - 1458
130 - 1483
135 - 1510
140 - 1536
145 - 1561
150 - 1588

The difference in the number of calories I can consume being 115 or 135 is roughly 100 calories - 100 calories difference for 20 lbs - who can't burn 100 calories?

I know many of us are struggling with the perfect "goal weight" so I just wanted to throw out the numbers to help a little.

**edit: I know many of you are doing WW points so I went looking for information and found 3 pages that were interesting.

The first is really a forum but I found the postings to be very enlightening. caloriecount.about.com/w
w-points-approx-calories-f
t49131


The 2nd is an article with pros and cons of the WW Points system www.healthyweightforum.o
rg/eng/articles/weight_wat
chers_points/


The last is an approximation of the patented formula used by WW www.peertrainer.com/Loun
geCommunityThread.aspx?For
umID=1&ThreadID=52065


Unlike BMR and counting calories, there is no way to accurately plan for a calorie range using WW Points - it depends entirely on the foods you eat and how much fat and/or fiber they contain. Unless the formula has been changed, it does not account for proteins.
Share This Post With Others
Member Comments About This Blog Post