ORANGE_MAMA's Blog  
 
 
Weight Watchers Confusion

Saturday, November 21, 2009

Are weight watchers members calculating both points and tracking food calories? Can someone please give me a clue as to how you manage to do both? emoticon emoticon
SHARE
  Member Comments About This Blog Post:

BOOGERSMOMMY 11/24/2009 8:33AM

    sounds like doing double the work! hope you sort it out.
KATELJM 11/21/2009 10:04AM

    Yes, there are several threads on W8Watchers Friends.

You can go crazy trying to meet both sets of criteria
simultaneously, so most people pick the one that suits
them better.

It comes down to a personal choice of which gives you
the simplicity or additional information you seek. Even
before SP, I didn't do WW points like everyone else.
I made 25 g of fiber a daily goal, and had to build my
own database to track that. I counted any fraction of a
point in an Excel worksheet, so I never played the
game, "you can eat this much of this before it
becomes a point."

Personally, I was always frustrated by the lack of nutri-
tional information in WW points. But for some people,
the less thinking involved, all the better.

What I like about WW points was that if I had been
very, very bad during the day, I could still eat a pile of
veggies and stay within my points. I also need that
mental checkoff that I have had 2 teaspoons of
HEALTHY fat. The flex points allowed an easy way to
see if daily variations in eating ended up with a
balanced mix over the course of a week.

In the SP W8Watcher Friends board,http://www.sparkpeople.com/my
spark/team_
messageboard_thr
ead.asp?board=0x865x2149201x24,
in the 9/15/06 11:50 AM post by KALYPSO97, this
example was given:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I think the difference in tracking the calories versus the
WW points is the fiber and fat grams. For instance:

Mini bag of 100 cal potato chips = 100 cal, 0 fiber, 8g
fat, 3 pts

Part skim string cheese (1.25 oz) = 100 cal, 0 fiber, 5.5g fat, 2 pts

Medium banana- 100 cal, 3g fiber, 0g fat,
1 pts

Mini bag of smartpop popcorn = 100 cal, 2.5g fat, 3g
fiber, 1 pt.

They are all 100 calories, but different points because of
the fiber and fat.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~

My concern, especially when I reduced caloric intake
to stay at a healthy weight, was that the limited food I
took in needed to maximize its contribution to
nourishing my body. We're fooling ourselves if we
think it doesn't matter whether we have balanced
meals. It will show up in the health of our insides,
whether it is our skin (internal and external), kidneys,
liver, heart, pancreas, gall bladder, thyroid, bones,
nervous system, etc.

I'm at the stage of my life where cancer, diabetes and
heart disease will take over if I don't take responsibility
for my eating and exercise. Nutrition is my primary
concern; I am becoming more reliant on good nutritional information, so I am biased toward SP's nutrition tracking.

Comment edited on: 11/21/2009 10:25:31 AM
IAJOEB 11/21/2009 9:25AM

    Well is it worth it to go to any length to achieve your goals?
But just a guess do one or the other.
Have a blessed day.
Maria
IXCHEL23 11/21/2009 8:39AM

    Have you posted this on your WW team, starting a new topic? Maybe you can get more feedback from them? Hope you had a nice time last night!
emoticon

Add Your Comment to the Blog Post


Leave encouragement, a question, or anything else relevant to this post. All blog comments must abide by SparkPeople's Community Guidelines.


Subscribe to this blog
I Liked This
Add An Emoticon Spell-Check  
Username: 
Password: 
Not a Member?  Register Now For Free
 



Other Entries by ORANGE_MAMA




Subscribe for Blog updates from ORANGE_MAMA:

By RSS:

Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to Google
Add to My AOL

RSS Feed
By Email: