VHALKYRIE   16,227
SparkPoints
15,000-19,999 SparkPoints
 
 
VHALKYRIE's Recent Blog Entries

Shrinking and Smoothing Cellulite

Sunday, July 22, 2012

My fat loss progress to date:

Weight Loss This Week: -1.6lbs
Weight Loss Total this Month: -2.4lbs
Lean Mass: +1lbs

I don't get big number drops, but my weight loss is smooth and steady. I don't get weird ups and downs anymore. My weight loss isn't linear, but it isn't wild swings, either. These days I get more excited about lean mass increases than I do about the weight loss.

As I've mentioned, I keep a running data table in an excel spreadsheet as this allows me to view information in a way I can't with the Spark reports. I noticed I tracked total carbs instead of net carbs, which I think is skewing my numbers somewhat. Insoluble fiber isn't digested, so it isn't accurate to include them in calorie or carb counts.

However, that revelation is just a bit more depressing. When I count only net carbs, I am even less carb tolerant than I realized. Perhaps it is because I'm small that my 'carbohydrate curve' is going to naturally slide down further from the average. Or I am more metabolically damaged.

Yesterday I talked about the difference between observational studies and experimental studies. I used my college diet as an example: no breakfast, ramen noodles, pizza, beer and Snackwells cookies. I was not fat. I didn't have a washboard stomach, but I had a fairly flat runway. Obviously my awesome college diet wasn't to credit. It is more likely I was less metabolically damaged that I could handle such a crap diet.

I lay the blame on metabolic trashing at the doorstep of trans-fats and HFCS that came after college when I ate more fast food and chain restaurants. McDonald's sausage biscuits for breakfast; double quarter pounders with supersized fries and coke for lunch; Chili's steak fajitas with 32oz adult kool-aid margaritas.

Observational studies would blame the high fat. I blame the quality of fat, plus sugar.

Saturated fats have been targeted as the devil for over 40 years. They raise triglycerides! Bad! Bad!

As I explained in my blog, "Yes, I Eat Vegetables", triglycerides are a fuel source. They DO come from saturated fats. They do not cause artery blockage in themselves, but are a symptom of metabolic syndrome. When insulin levels are elevated, our bodies cannot burn triglycerides, they build up and float around.

www.sparkpeople.com/mypage_public_jo
urnal_individual.asp?blog_id=4977511


To date, the only clinically proven fats that are artery clogging and heart damaging are trans-fats. Zero gram of trans-fat is a safe level. Due to a quirk in the FDA requirements, food manufacturers do not have to report trans-fats in quantities less than .5g.

When fast food companies were compelled to switch from using lard fat, they primarily chose shelf stable and cheap partially hydrogenated vegetable oils high in trans-fats.

My body type is pear shaped. When I gain weight, I tend to put it on the hips and buttocks before anywhere else. As I lose weight, I tend to lose it in my upperbody first. This past month, I'm blessed with noticeable 'firming' in my arms, but much slower decrease in my lower body.

Before I became fat, I had very smooth skin. Almost no cellulite. When I gained weight, I put on a disgusting cottage cheese layer of cellulite.

Cellulite is pocket distortions in the fat cell walls under our skin. We are what we eat. When I put on fat, I ate poor quality fat. Mainly PUFAs - polyunsaturated vegetable oils: soybean, canola, safflower, sunflower, and corn. And the hydrogenated vegetable oils common in fast food and chain restaurants.

My fat sources these days are primarily real butter, coconut oil, olive oil, and avocados.

As I'm losing weight, my cellulite smooths out beautifully. It's not quite gone, but it is shrinking. The cottage cheese effect is lessening. I am starting to see muscles emerge from underneath my skin. Now I know why people like to work out in front of the mirror. I love seeing my muscles move.

As my fat cells release their contents, I can't help but wonder if the old stored trans-fats are going to cause problems. I'm trying to up my antioxidant rich foods - even if higher carb - during my weight loss. Just as an insurance policy. I don't want bad food I ate 12 years ago derailing my health or clogging my arteries today.

Part of my weight loss goal is to reduce my cellulite. Losing the old fat, and eating high quality fats (no PUFAs) are keys. I'm also experimenting with something called "dry body brushing" that is supposed to help smooth out the cell walls.

This is one of the 'non scale' ways I measure progress. The numbers are great, but it doesn't make me feel as beautiful and sexy as much as watching my cellulite zap in the mirror.

  
  Member Comments About This Blog Post:

SCUBAHONEY 7/26/2012 9:53AM

    Wow, you are such an inspiration! I also have problems with carbs. When I eat any kind of starchy carbs I bloat up like crazy! I haven't really paid attention to carb types (except the above mentioned) but maybe I need to start. I'm so tired of the yo yo weight gain and loss. Thanks for helping us all in our struggle!

Report Inappropriate Comment
VHALKYRIE 7/23/2012 8:41AM

    _RAMONA: Great questions! I'll try and make a blog post with some of my favorite resources soon.

NEILITHICMAN: Holiday throws me off track too, but these days I can just resume where I left off! Hope you had a nice holiday!

Report Inappropriate Comment
NEILITHICMAN 7/22/2012 11:50PM

    Well done on your weight loss this month. Normally my weight loss is pretty consistant, around a kilo a week, but this month it was all over the place. Because I was on holiday for a couple of weeks so I wasn't geting my regular walk to and from work every day and my exercise wasn't consistent, some days 4-5 hours, some days none.

Report Inappropriate Comment
_RAMONA 7/22/2012 6:11PM

    I'm beyond grateful for having found you... every blog is a learning experience.... and not just from you, but from our readers, too!

Could you point me to some resources with regard to understanding better the idea of toatal carbs vs. net carbs? What does the SparkTracker track?

And about resources in general... what are your favourites?

Again, THANK YOU!

Report Inappropriate Comment
VHALKYRIE 7/22/2012 3:12PM

    MAPPLEBUM: I have not been to Scooby's webpage. Which one is it? I don't limit the quantity of my fat, just the trans-fat and PUFAs I mentioned. Whatever I naturally add from cooking in butter, coconut oil, or olive oil is whatever it is.

I've eaten an average of 1400 this month.

Report Inappropriate Comment
VHALKYRIE 7/22/2012 3:01PM

    Thanks for the info on the insoluble fiber, Birdy! Where would I be without you! I'll check out the Dr. Rosedale interview!

SALONKITTY & LYNDALOVES2HIKE: Even if the dry body brushing does nothing for the cellulite, I'll keep doing it for the full body exfoliating effect. Cheaper than having it done at the spa! It is bracing, but my skin feels so soft after my shower!

CATH63: I have been doing my pushup routines, but nothing too special in terms of arms. My "bat wings" have been folding (haha) mostly due to my fat loss, I think. I, too, am an upperbody weakling, but my pushups have been helping. I also got a pilates bar so I can do reverse pullups. I think those are helping, too.

FITGIRL15: I just want to say that you've been a huge inspiration to me on this journey! I've been following you for a long time, and your progress certainly helped motivate me to clean up my food and routines! Agree with everything you said!

emoticon

DOWNEASTB: Wow! Low carb has done you well! I would not have guessed you are in your 40s! I thought you were younger than me!

I think elasticity of skin is a factor, too. Which makes me want to bonk myself on the head that I wasted my youth on junk! Ahh well. I'll just have to shoot for being one of those people who run laps around kids half my age!

MRS.CARLY: I'm hoping that I didn't tear the elasticity of my skin too much. I'm waiting to see if I end up with 'sag' after I reach my intended bodyfat level.

Comment edited on: 7/22/2012 3:39:16 PM

Report Inappropriate Comment
MRS.CARLY 7/22/2012 2:45PM

    I have had cellulite a really really long time. My thighs are HUGE and I notice that my thighs have way more cellulite now than they did years ago. I am wondering if my skin has stretched and that is why I see a few "ripples" in the fronts of my legs. Women at my weight tend to wear smaller sizes. I have been as low as 155 pounds and still wore a size 12 in jeans.

When I FINALLY reach my ultimate weight loss goal, I am going to research cosmetic surgery to help with that problem. I left weights and I work out hard in the gym, but in my case I think the skin may be stretched out already :-(

Report Inappropriate Comment
DOWNEASTB 7/22/2012 2:07PM

    My cellulite has gotten worse as I've lost fat on my thighs and rear, but I'm over 40 and apparently that can be expected. I need to get in the habit of dry brushing. Have a brush, just need to use the darn thing!

Report Inappropriate Comment
FITGIRL15 7/22/2012 1:23PM

    I will have to google "dry body brushing"... I have found, that the more weight I lose, the smoother my legs appear. And I can only lose weight if I eat a healthy diet. So, healthy diet = less cottage cheese thighs (and smaller waist) but as I age, the cellulite is just par for the course, and I try not to be too hard on myself! My body isn't as resilient as it once was... something I just have to live with, and carry on loving the new me!!!

It doesn't surprise me that you have a spreadsheet. LOL You are highly BLUE energy! :) (So is Joe!!!)

Report Inappropriate Comment
LYNDALOVES2HIKE 7/22/2012 1:10PM

    Your blogs are very informative and interesting so thanks for posting. I'm glad your cellulite is smoothing out but not sure the dry-brushing is so effective. I haven't done research on that, though, so you might get great results. Good luck!
emoticon

Report Inappropriate Comment
CATH63 7/22/2012 12:58PM

    Have you done any particular exercises that have resulted in your arms becoming firmer, or is it a result of fat loss? I would LOVE to figure out how to get rid of my "bat wings". I'm not sure if it's really a wing of fat or if it's just an empty pocket where triceps are meant to reside.

I've been taking measurements since January and have lost almost everywhere except my thighs, calves, and upper arms. My legs are very muscular - it's genetic; I can't take any credit. My arms, on the other hand (no pun intended) could use some work!

Report Inappropriate Comment
SALONKITTY 7/22/2012 12:27PM

    Another great blog! I just finished watching the Fat Head documentary, coincidentally, so this post of yours neatly sums up a lot of what was discussed in that film.

I have a bunch of cellulite, but I also had a little before I put on all this weight. I found mine disappeared the more I lifted weights....it could have just been the result of becoming leaner overall (I was running and doing various cardio machines as well, six days per week), but I've always suspected it was the weights.

I know about dry body brushing! It's rather bracing to do it in the morning pre-shower, isn't it! It takes some getting used to, but I did learn to like it after a fashion. It definitely gets one's circulation going, and exfoliates beautifully! I should return to it, as it did seem like a good thing....I'd kind of forgotten about it--thanks for the reminder! I would think it probably does help with cellulite....do let us know what you think after trying it out for a while.

Report Inappropriate Comment
EATNBOOGERS 7/22/2012 11:59AM

    With you on the fat.

Report Inappropriate Comment
YOUNGNSMYLIE 7/22/2012 11:56AM

    Wow there is a lot of great information here. Thank you for sharing this blog post. I have forgotten lately how important the quality of what I am eating is, as opposed to just the quantity. Congratulations on your steady weight loss! emoticon

Report Inappropriate Comment
ALESHAWALKER 7/22/2012 11:39AM

    Ver informative.... I liked reading, good research!

Report Inappropriate Comment
JUSTBIRDY 7/22/2012 11:15AM

    check out Dr. Rosedale's latest interview. Wow, he doesn't mince words about Ludwig's bad interpretation of his own data. And, though he has said it before, it is great to hear again: overall health and longevity is a function of the total amount of carbs eaten in a lifetime.

Report Inappropriate Comment
JUSTBIRDY 7/22/2012 11:13AM

    turns out insoluble fiber is partially digested, and so it will affect the overall calorie count. Good news is that it doesn't break down into carbs. It gets broken down into short-chain fatty acids and burned like fat.
My weight still continues to be challenging, as in, perfection leads to weight maintenance, but eating anything else leads to gain. Since switching to more fat and seafood, people tell me that my skin looks wonderful.
Oh my! I would never listen to Scooby!!!!!But I really should on the cheese front, my one remaining weakness....

Report Inappropriate Comment
KELPIE57 7/22/2012 11:06AM

    as always interesting and informative

Report Inappropriate Comment
MAPPLEBUM 7/22/2012 11:00AM

    You're obviously very well read. I've recently started paying attention to Scooby's rule of thumb (Have you been to his webpage? He's hilarious), which is don't eat it if the calories from fat exceed 10% of the total calories. I'm never going to abide by this entirely, simply for cases such as olive oil and soymilk. However, it does help when choosing meats at the grocery store and trying to cure my addiction to cheese :)

Mind if I ask, how many calories are you consuming a day? And how much are you working out?

Report Inappropriate Comment
MOVIEGRL1737 7/22/2012 10:56AM

    Very informative thanks for sharing!

Report Inappropriate Comment


Observational versus Experimental Studies

Saturday, July 21, 2012

There's a study making the rounds in dietary literature that claims low carbohydrate diets increases risk of Swedish women's cardiovascular disease. The study was based on a questionnaire that asked women what they ate in the past 16 years.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22735105

According to the summary:

"A one tenth decrease in carbohydrate intake or increase in protein intake or a 2 unit increase in the low carbohydrate-high protein score were all statistically significantly associated with increasing incidence of cardiovascular disease overall"

emoticon

Well. That should be enough evidence for all of us to turn course and go back into the safety of skim milk and low-fat cottage cheese.

But wait. We can't conclude anything from this study at all.

It's an observational study.

Tom Naughton (of "FatHead" documentary fame) has a YouTube video speech he gave on a low-carb cruise explaining how to spot good science from bad science.

Good science = Clinical/Experimental Study
Bad science = Observational Study

www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1RXvBveht0

An example of flawed observational study conclusion:

"People who like to run are thin. I am fat. Therefore, if I want to be thin, I should run."

But there are numerous people who run and never get thin. They get shin splints and metatarsal stress fracture. If they can't run, how can they get thin?

The real conclusion is: "People who are thin tend to chose running for exercise."

Here's another observational study. 16 years ago (the period in which this study was conducted), I was a college student. I ate no breakfast, ramen noodles, pizza, beer, and Snackwells low-fat cookies. I was slim and weighed 125lbs. What can we conclude? Was it no breakfast, ramen noodles, pizza, beer or Snackwell's cookie that kept me slim?

We can't conclude anything. Even if we add in that I was walking an average of 2 hours per day to classes, uphill both ways, we can't conclude anything. Even if we added in my entire girl's dorm who were doing the same thing, we can't conclude anything.

Snackwells cookies were very popular in my dorm. Did it keep us college age girls slim? Did most of us gain weight after college because we stopped eating Snackwells? Should we eat more like we did in college to lose more weight?

Here is a breakdown analysis on the flaws with the Swedish study. She is not a low-carber; she is a raw food vegan who hates bad science.

rawfoodsos.com/2012/07/01/bad-scienc
e-strikes-again/


Her summary:

- This study is observational—meaning it tells us nothing about cause and effect.
- This study relies on one food frequency questionnaire that the women filled out upon enrollment in the Women’s Lifestyle and Health Cohort. We have no idea what they were eating during the next 16 years.
- Women reported their food intake during the early ’90s, when low-fat diets were the gold standard for healthy eating. The most health-conscious women were likely to be eating the most carbohydrate at that time.
- Food frequency questionnaires are all sorts of terrible and don’t let anyone ever tell you otherwise.
- The study’s “diet score” design assumes that all low-carbohydrate diets are necessarily high in protein—resulting in a point-assigning system that doesn’t always identify true low carbers.
- The women with the lowest carbohydrate intake in this study were still eating up to 123 grams of it a day (an amount that’s probably wildly underestimated, to boot)—meaning they weren’t actually eating a low-carbohydrate diet.
- The true increase in cardiovascular disease risk from scoring high on the “low carb, high protein” scale is pretty minor—and pales in comparison to other lifestyle variables.

Emphasis: 123g daily carbohydrates was the lowest carb intake in this study. The conclusions are not drawn on a low-carb diet at all.

Here is a Standford clinical study comparing Atkins, Zone, Ornish, and LEARN (standard american recommended diet). Atkins outperformed all of the other diets in terms of weight loss, blood lipids, blood pressure, increased HDL, decreased LDL, normal cholesterol, low triglycerides, and overall compliance following the diet. The head researcher is a life-long vegetarian, and although surprised by the results, reported the facts as they stand. Conclusion: Atkins did not increase the risk of metabolic syndrome and heart disease, but decreased all known long term clinical markers.

Abstract: nutrition.stanford.edu/documents/AZ_
abstract.pdf

Youtube: www.youtube.com/watch?v=eREuZEdMAVo

The other interesting conclusion on the Stanford clincal trial is people who had some degree of insulin resistance performed better on Atkins. People who had no degree of insulin resistance performed better on the LEARN diet.

Here is an article about North Carolinian dieticians attempting to use legislation to censor a blogger who writes about how he cured his diabetes through a low-carb diet.

www.forbes.com/sites/michaelellsberg
/2012/07/10/american_dietetic_associat
ion_2/


The blogger in question is named Steve Cooksey. Here is his blog, and all the ailments he cured through diet alone:

www.diabetes-warrior.net/about-me-an
d-diabetes/


There's so much conflicting information, it's difficult to tell the good from the bad. Recognizing the difference between an observational study versus an experimental/clinical study is an important way to weed out the good from the bad.

Overall, self-experimentation was the only way I knew for sure.

Does my diet:
- Make me feel better
- Improves quality of life
- Leaves me with energy throughout the day
- No energy crashes
- No hunger
- No cravings
- Loses weight
- Easy weight maintenance

Does my diet reduce risk of Metabolic Syndrome/Heart Disease:
- Normal blood lipids (HDL,LDL,Trigylcerides)
- Normal blood pressure
- Normal body weight/body fat

My answer to all of the above is a resounding checkmark +.

Thanks to JustBirdy for raising the awareness on the ADA censorship and Denise Minger's analysis of the Swedish study.

"What did YOU eat 16 years ago?"
www.sparkpeople.com/mypage_public_jo
urnal_individual.asp?blog_id=4978155


"Forbes article exposes the "academy's" creepy practices"
www.sparkpeople.com/mypage_public_jo
urnal_individual.asp?blog_id=4965309

  
  Member Comments About This Blog Post:

JUSTBIRDY 7/22/2012 3:13PM

    Oh, wait@! The Swedish women who were more educated had less heart disease events!

Report Inappropriate Comment
JUSTBIRDY 7/22/2012 3:12PM

    hey, we should conclude that people shouldn't go to college!!!!

Report Inappropriate Comment
LYNDALOVES2HIKE 7/21/2012 2:58PM

    I took a bazillion classes in statistics and research methodology when I was in grad school so I learned a lot about how to read research - unfortunately, most people don't realize there is a huge difference between 'correlation' and 'cause/effect' - correlation just means that A happened when B occurred but unless an extensive multivariate analysis is done, there's no way to even begin to understand the problem OR to form the next hypothesis for the next research study.

And even more unfortunately, I know just how easy it is for people to be fooled by marketing - I have many years experience in the industry and teach it at the college level. It's not to say that 'marketing' is bad or even manipulative, although the goal is to get people to 'buy' something - maybe a product, maybe a political stance, maybe a religious opinion - marketing is present in every single aspect of life. But a VERY small percentage of adults have ever studied it enough to realize what's going on and how subtle associations can be used to convince them to 'buy' whatever is being 'sold,' in this case the idea is that low carb is bad. I'm very happy to see you pointing out the fallacies many people might not realize are there and helping people understand that they can't necessarily draw a conclusion from a particular research study unless they really KNOW how to read the info!

The worst part of this, to continue my rant, is when DOCTORS and other professionals we think we should trust also don't know how to read the research much of the time! I know we 'want' to believe that a medical professional has extensive training in reading research but they often have just the basics and focus more on 'practice' than 'research' in med school. They also get zero or almost zero training in nutrition, weight loss or gain, fitness and so forth unless they seek it out for themselves as an extra topic to study. So we often hear ridiculous theories from doctors who honestly are subject to the same flawed thinking as the rest of the population about many topics.

OK, stepping off the soap box for the moment!

emoticon emoticon

Report Inappropriate Comment
CTTAGENT 7/21/2012 2:38PM

    Very nice blog. It is so easy to allow studies, no matter what form, govern our reactions. As you pointed out, it ultimately comes down to how what we eat affects our health and well-being. People may look at the amount of protein I eat and think I am overdoing, but if I do not have that my nails break and I crave (and thus eat) carbs causing weight gain. But yet the next person may only need a little bit of protein to satisfy. There is not one diet that will fit all people, and the studies as you point out, are generalizations about one aspect.

Report Inappropriate Comment
BREWMASTERBILL 7/21/2012 12:05PM

    Any study where intake of food is self reported is immediately grounds for discard. I don't know a single person who doesn't suffer from what I like to call "food amnesia". This is why tracking is so incredibly important for weight loss, IMO. But that's irrelevant to this. Denise Minger, while wordy, definitely sums up my opinion on the matter. Ridiculously flawed to the point of stupid.

Report Inappropriate Comment
DIANE7786 7/21/2012 12:04PM

    Great blog. The Cooksey info is scary.

Report Inappropriate Comment


It's Not Just About the Weight

Friday, July 20, 2012

Just before I got started on my low-carb journey, I went flexitarian. I was trying to limit animal protein to the evening.

Here's a sampling of my diet then:

February 1, 2011
Breakfast: Blueberries, Kashi cereal, non-fat plain yogurt
Lunch: Carrots, celery, lettuce, tomatoes, bell pepper, poached egg, quinoa, pepperoncini
Dinner: Lettuce, bell pepper, tomatoes, carrots, celery, cheese lasagna, wine
Snack: Almond Butter, Apples
Calorie Total: 1341
Carbs: 176 | 54%
Fat: 44 | 30%
Protein: 53g | 16%

Eating this way was very easy to hit the Spark recommended ranges.

My weight graph for that time period showed I weighed 136 in February '11, and 135 in April '11. Not very impressive. You might argue that my food choices weren't ideal. I agree. But at that time, I believed calorie was a calorie, no matter what the source. So if the calorie matters and not the composition, I should have done better. I stayed within my ranges.

But really, I think this was the cleanest I had eaten.

As I wrote in my blog, "Realizing the Connection", my health deteriorated. Even though my weight didn't change much, I was getting fatter. My body composition was changing in the wrong direction.

www.sparkpeople.com/mypage_public_jo
urnal_individual.asp?blog_id=4971121


I started researching low carb in April, then made the switch in May. Because I was toe-dipping my way in, I only cut my carbs back to half the normal to observe if I could see any change. I went down to about 60g carbs.

It worked! I started losing weight, so the 'insulin theory' seemed to have some merit for me at least. I was hooked, and wanted more. But there was a catch. I never did a typical induction because there was a detour ahead.

I didn't know anything about 'low-carb flu'. It caught me off guard. A couple weeks later, I got a sinus infection, which wasn't unusual for me. Something about it seemed different, though. It was a little weird to me it coincided with my dietary change. I think I searched for something like, "sinus infection on low-carb". Numerous links for 'low-carb flu' came up. Ok, this wasn't unusual. I decided to stick it out.

I got a particularly bad case of 'low-carb flu' because it lasted for months. I also got a bad case of thrush. Weight loss was the least of my worries. When I described these symptoms, someone on one of my blogs mentioned 'candida infection', so I researched that.

Turned out that years of my high carb/high sugar diet and antibiotic use for sinus infections killed off beneficial bacteria and allowed candida to proliferate.

Candida lives in our gut. Normally it doesn't do any harm because the other healthy gut bacteria competes for resources. But when the healthy bacteria population is killed by antibiotics, candida runs rampant. It's a fungus, not a bacteria, so it is unharmed by antibiotics.

You see what happened, right? I got sinus infections, took antibiotics, and killed gut flora over and over. Candida loves sugar, and my high carb/sugar diet gave them plenty of food. Despite being a regular yogurt consumer, this didn't help the balance. The candida was overrun, and starved off healthy gut bacteria for resource. Exactly the opposite of normal balance.

I was rather surprised that a fungus might have been causing my sinus infection, and not a bacteria. Perhaps all those years I took antibiotics killed off my gut flora for no good effect?

What made the candida theory particularly compelling was the thrush. The reason candida manifested in my sinuses and thrush was because my new low carb diet was starving them in the gut. They moved up into my head where they could obtain food.

I started researching how to get rid of a candida infection. The resources I found were depressing. Many suggested that eliminating a systemic candida infection was a very slow process, takes a long time, and some people never truly get it under control. Some people can manage, but never cure. But no matter what, it seemed the low-carb diet was the right track. There are books on candida diets designed to starve them out.

And you thought Atkins is hard to follow? Try looking up a 'candida diet' sometime.

Eating yogurt wasn't going to undo something this deeply rooted.

Luckily, a Spark friend of mine was going through a similar low-carb revelation as me. She also concluded she had a systemic candida infection. But while I started off relatively healthy, my friend was recovering from severe adrenal fatigue syndrome. Years of a high grain diet, chronic cardio, and the drug Adderall almost killed her. Her adrenals started shutting down one by one. In order to save her life, she abandoned her vegetarian diet of 16 years, something that caused her a great deal of emotional and moral pain.

She is still trying to heal her adrenals, but she is convinced that saturated fats and proteins saved her life.

(Note: Please do not read into this that I'm being anti-vegetarian. I started off with my 'flexitarian' story to illustrate the variety of different diets I went through. I see Spark member's blogs who do well on flexitarianism, and that's awesome! Regarding my friend, we can speculate all we want on whether she did vegetarianism 'right' or not. She personally believes Adderall did the most damage. Whatever it did to her makes it impossible for her to return to vegetarianism. Looking up "Adderall and adrenal fatigue" has surprising results.)

Together, we passed tons of messages to each other, trying to figure out how to rid ourselves of the candida as well as fix our damaged metabolisms. My friend was a biochemist, which was an absolute boon in helping me understand so many things I was reading. Conventional medicine wasn't going to help us, because they said our conditions didn't exist. We weren't defying any doctor's advice because they said nothing was wrong with us.

My friend discovered a powdered probiotic that was said to help with candida infections, and she passed the link on Amazon to me. She had been taking it for a week, and her candida symptoms were improving. It was an import from Japan, and very expensive. The reviews on Amazon, if to be believed, were miraculous. Almost too good to be true. But having suffered my sinus infection for a month, I figured I didn't have anything to lose.

(Because Spark doesn't recommend the use of non FDA dietary supplements, I'm not going to mention the product by name. Please message me directly if you want to know.)

The probiotics in yogurt are kinds that live in our guts full time. With a healthy population, they will multiply their numbers and live there symbiotically with us. The type of probiotics in this product are types that target candida specially. Some of them would compete with the candida for food, starving them out. The rest would actually eat the candida for food. But once they did their job, they would die out and not live permanently in the gut. Our bodies aren't symbiotic for them. They are naturally found in our environment in plants, so we eat them normally in low concentrations all the time. This Japanese probiotic is for the purpose of candida elimination.

So that was my strategy. Kill off the existing candida, and eat yogurts and other supplemental probiotics to repopulated the beneficial colony. The beneficial colony couldn't get a foothold as long as the candida was dominant.

I was warned not to take too much too quickly, or in addition to low carb flu, I'd also get 'candida die off'. That didn't sound very nice, and I already felt like crap, so I only took 1 packet per day. It came in powdered form, so I mixed it with water in the morning.

There was no improvement for the first 3 days (but I stopped getting worse). On the 4th day, my sinuses opened and I could breathe from my nose for the first time in about 4 weeks. My left ear, which was threatening to become an ear infection, opened on the 5th day. My sinuses drained out in a gross way. Fluid came out so fast, I thought I had a bloody nose. Apparently it was liquidized candida. Yuck. Good riddance.

I took about another 3 months of using this product plus repopulating beneficial colonies to say I was 'cured'. My friend, still recovering from adrenal fatigue, praised my 'quick' success. Starting off in an unhealthier state, she had more ups and downs. Because her adrenals were in a weakened state, she got the 'candida die off', and had to back off on her usage until she was stronger.

(I talked to her recently and she said her candida is mostly taken care of, she's getting stronger, but she's still working on building up her damaged immune system. She's switched to a GAPS diet, which has been beneficial for people with adrenal fatigue syndrome, IBS, ADHD, autism, and a number of other 'modern' ailments.)

After I eliminated the candida overgrowth, a number of symptoms I didn't even know were related disappeared. In addition to the sinus infections, there were eczema, allergies, IBS type symptoms, yeast infections, and inability to lose weight.

The inability to lose weight was due to the candida consuming the nutrients that I was supposed to be absorbing in my intestines. The IBS symptoms were due to a similar reason.

I realize there are skeptics out there who might dismiss this as 'new age holistic medicine nonsense'. I hear ya. If it didn't happen to me, I wonder if I'd be writing a different story.

I was motivated to write this because of a comment Spark friend Woubbie wrote on DOWNEASTB's blog about her low-carb story:

www.sparkpeople.com/mypage_public_jo
urnal_individual.asp?blog_id=4977694


Woubie: "If I never lost another ounce eating low carb I would stick with it for the way I feel. Just to never have heartburn is a sheer wonder!"

I so agree. Sinus infections, eczema, allergies, IBS type symptoms, yeast infections, and inability to lose weight - all gone. If I never lose another pound, I'm still living better than I was a year ago. Some detractors have said this is an unsustainable lifestyle. No, living in a state of unexplained illness was unsustainable. If it were just about the weight loss, then maybe I would have gone back to eating pasta and potatoes with every meal. But having gone through a rather nightmarish process, I have a rather strong incentive to avoid it.

So despite the risk of ridicule, I felt it important to write this. Because maybe, just maybe, someone with an open mind might see something of themselves in what I'm saying. I don't care about the non believers - I'm never going to convince them anyway. I'm having a conversation with someone who knows what I'm talking about. Maybe that person has already gone through this. Maybe that person is still trying to figure it out. It helps to know that you aren't so crazy after all, doesn't it?

  
  Member Comments About This Blog Post:

MRS.CARLY 7/20/2012 10:57PM

    The candida diet was the worse thing I've ever been on. 2 months of the strictest diet!! Blah!

I need to start taking probiotics again!!

Report Inappropriate Comment
JUSTBIRDY 7/20/2012 6:43PM

    I think this is what happened to me when I started CT'ing. A foot injury resurfaced, and got worse and worse before it went away for good. I also used a topical anti-fungal on it. My podiatrist told me to keep CT'ing my foot.

Report Inappropriate Comment
VHALKYRIE 7/20/2012 6:29PM

    _RAMONA: You said it better than me! Birthday cakes are inevitable! They just no longer derail me into binges or self flagellation.

The way I eat 80% of the time (following MDAs 80% rule!) keeps those nondescript and yet qualify-of-life altering illnesses at bay.

Report Inappropriate Comment
_RAMONA 7/20/2012 6:06PM

    "Some detractors have said this is an unsustainable lifestyle. No, living in a state of unexplained illness [for most of my life to date] was unsustainable." AMEN.

I also don't get the whole 'unsustainable' argument with respect any nutritional/eating plan. People (and detractors of any particualr approach to food) so often act as though a 'diet' or nutritional plan is something being done *to* them... something rigid, imposed, proscribed, and restrictive, and not of their choosing.

No matter what/how I'm eating (deliberatly putting something in my mouth and swallowing it), I'm eating it because *I choose* to do so. The only restricitive or limiting factor is *me*. Anything is as sustainable as I choose to make it.

If I'm convicted about what I'm doing, it's sustainable.
If I'm getting all of the nutrients I need to be healthy and well, it's sustainable.
If I feel better than I have ever felt in my life, it's sustainable.
Paleo, for me, is not only sustainable it's empowering, encouraging and freeing.

If I choose to sit down and eat a sandwich, or have a bowl of pasta, or have birthday cake it's not because my nutritional plan isn't sustainable, it's because I chose to modify, or depart from it for a meal, a day, forever.

Well... I feel better having got that off my chest, LOL! I'm certain you know what I mean. Another great blog!



Report Inappropriate Comment
VHALKYRIE 7/20/2012 2:30PM

    Not everyone gets it. I just happened to be one of the 'lucky' ones due to candida rising to the surface. Most people just seem to get headaches and sugar-withdrawal symptoms, and the discomfort lasts a couple of weeks. Mine was abnormal.

Report Inappropriate Comment
LYNDALOVES2HIKE 7/20/2012 11:26AM

    Thanks for posting this - as you know, I'm somewhat new to the low-carb world but trying to learn as much as possible at the moment. I have heard about candida but never heard about the 'low-carb flu' - I do eat yogurt and have for years, also take a probiotic supplement [liquid] when I feel like I'm getting out of balance but will check into candida as some of the symptoms are familiar. Thanks again!
emoticon

Report Inappropriate Comment


Yes, I Eat Vegetables

Thursday, July 19, 2012

I'm going to tread carefully today because I'm a little incensed, and I have to watch my tone.

I told you a couple blogs ago about how I botched my understanding of Atkins with double quarter pounders. This was due to ignorance. I didn't read the books. I didn't know why people were able to lose weight on it. How can people lose fat by eating so much fat?

A common theme I see on the message boards is, "I tried Atkins, but I gained weight!" I messaged one of these people and asked her how her induction went. I never heard back from her. I'm guessing it's because she didn't read the book, and didn't do induction.

Most of the low-carb methods I know of have some level of induction. Even the "South Beach" diet. South Beach is a moderate carb, low-fat diet. I decided I was never again going to buy skim milk or low fat cottage cheese, so I didn't choose this diet. But I love the cookbook and still use it. I just use real butter and whole milk/cheese replacing the low-fat versions in the recipes. However, South Beach has "phases" that starts off with heavily restricting carbohydrates.

Just like Atkins. Just like Protein Power. Primal Blueprint doesn't have an induction per say, but it does restrict carbs to certain vegetables and fruit during the weight loss stages, and opens a wider variety during maintenance.

Here's why induction is essential - not optional - to low carb success.

Many of us on high-carb/low fat diets have unnaturally high levels of insulin in our bloodstream. Many of us were never diagnosed with insulin resistance or diabetes, some of us were. If we're carrying excess amount of bodyfat (33% in my case), we are in a state where our bodies cannot use all the carbohydrates supplied, and it gets stored as fat. In the presence of high insulin load, dietary fat gets turned into triglycerides, and we're unable to burn stored fat or dietary fat for energy.

Triglycerides are a fuel source. The reason why people with metabolic syndrome also have high trigs is because the insulin load prevents them from being burned. High triglycerides are a symptom of a very severe problem - insulin resistance. Your body can't burn the triglycerides in the presence of the dominant insulin hormone.

Insulin is a hormone that turns on fat storage and turns off fat burn. The point of induction is to drop that insulin load so we can start burning fat. If people skip induction, particularly if they are very overweight or insulin resistant, then they don't drop their insulin load when they start eating more fat. The fat they eat gets turned into triglycerides, makes their blood lipids worse, they get fatter, and then they declare Atkins doesn't work.

Still, there are some cases where people's bodies are resistant to losing weight (low carb OR other), and even if they do induction, they might not see the results many of us do. Dr. Eades has several tips for these people to try.

Induction is very restrictive, but it is temporary. Some of us experience 'low carb flu' where we feel sick. This is usually due to side effects from our high carb diets. Headaches and cravings due to sugar withdrawal, not too unlike a drug addict symptom, are common. Switching from burning glucose to fat results in an energy drop, but we adapt.

About 'low-carb flu'. I became very sick due to an overgrowth of candida. This was from years of high carb/high sugar and antibiotic use that allowed the candida to overtake my system. I never knew this was a problem, and took me completely by surprise. Allergies, eczema, chronic sinus infections, yeast infections, IBS like symptoms, poor digestion, and inability to lose weight were all symptoms.

I got the worst sinus infection of my life as the candida was being starved out due to sudden carb withdrawal. It took months of probiotics in order to get rid of it. Before I tried low-carb myself, I would have dismissed someone describing candida overgrowth as quackery.

I'm a believer from real world experience. I have been free of my candida infection for about 9 months. I have no allergies, no eczema, no sinus/yeast infections, no IBS, and lost weight. I don't care if there are no scientific studies to prove this. Anecdotal, coincidental or not, this was what happened for me. My quality of life is so much better. This is one reason why I won't consider going back to a high grain diet. I don't want that crap back.

I'm a little tired of people dismissing low-carbs as a valid diet because of a few ignorant people who didn't read the books and are eating poorly. Pizza is junk food. Double quarter pounders are junk food. Deep fried food is not low-carb. People who order steaks and skip the salad are not eating the way the low-carb books recommend.

Look, there are people who eat poorly on any 'diet'. I see people on the message boards exclaim, "I've done everything right! Why can't I lose weight?" You go to their food tracker, and there's baked Lays potato chips, Snackwells Devil's Food Cakes, and low-fat yogurt that has 26g of sugar. You know why I find this particularly sad and funny? Because this is what I used to do! I didn't lose weight that way either! I wasn't eating remotely healthy.

I know vegetarians who don't eat enough vegetables. Doritos are not a highly nutritious vegetable. Why is it if you search for 'vegan' on FoodGawker.com, 90% of the recipes that come up are vegan muffins, cookies and cakes? Aren't vegans supposed to eat vegetables? (And to be fair, low-carb has a similar problem).

"Low carb" friends who eat double quarter pounders because "the extra meat compensates for the bun" are making a poor choice. People who pick the toppings off pizza leaving the crust are making a poor choice. When I did this, I was making a poor choice.

I want to apologize to all my low-carb friends for perpetuating this myth many years ago.

emoticon

I am partially responsible for this stereotype, so I wish to make amends.

I am ethnically half Korean/half German. I grew up on my mother's yummy and healthy Korean meals, eating lots of vegetables along with protein and rice. I wasn't fat growing up.

One of my favorite dishes is Korean Kalbi, which is usually a marinated short rib, but sometimes my mom would use other cuts of meat like flank steak. A popular way we used to eat it was to take a bite sized piece and fold it into a fresh lettuce leaf like a wrap.

I grew up in Colorado, and in addition to my mom's Korean food, my cooking style is heavily influenced by Southwest Tex-Mex. Fajitas are my favorite tex-mex food.

Last night I made what my husband called "Kaljitas". Part kalbi, part southwest fajita. I grilled a flank steak, onion, and bell pepper like a fajita. I made guacamole and broiled a zucchini.



We wrapped it in lettuce leaves instead of flour or corn tortillas. Topped with a little guac.



This was 343 calories. A very respectable number even for low calorie diets.

I dare make the claim that this is healthier than my low-fat diet days. I would have skipped the highly nutritious guac because of its fat content, instead eating the comparatively nutritionally devoid tortilla. A small fajita sized tortilla has 90 calories. That's as many calories as my guacamole serving. I probably would have eaten 3 tortillas, making this a higher calorie meal.

Also, I do not buy "low carb" tortillas any more than I would "low fat" tortillas. Enjoy them if you wish, but please do not fool yourself into thinking it is somehow beating the system. Our biology knows the difference.

  
  Member Comments About This Blog Post:

CATH63 7/20/2012 4:43AM

    Great blog as usual! Would you share the instructions for how you make your own full fat yogurt with the Chobani? I'd like to try it!

Report Inappropriate Comment
CAROLJEAN64 7/20/2012 12:49AM

    What you have and are learning about your body with food, I finally learned with yoga. I finally am beginning to understand when my body is talking and should be listened to over my mind. I think way too often, we give total credibility to our minds and ignore our bodies.

Report Inappropriate Comment
MRS.CARLY 7/19/2012 10:02PM

    You are right! I've posted on blogs my feedback on why I think they aren't losing weight (too many processed foods, way too much sugar) and I never hear back from anyone. I guess I tick them off.

I understand about candida overgrowth COMPLETELY. That stuff is insane!

Report Inappropriate Comment
GETSTRONGRRR 7/19/2012 8:06PM

    Another great post! While getting "less bizarre" every day, I am getting more comfortable not avoiding fat (that was a logically difficult sentence)

But here I am sitting at the DFW airport, right across from my old nemesis Aunti Anne's pretzels and, other than a momentary pang (similar to seeing an old GF/BF after many years) feel neither compulsion or temptation to walk over and order up a salty, buttery lump of dough.

Report Inappropriate Comment
VHALKYRIE 7/19/2012 5:32PM

    JUSTBIRDY: I have a dear friend who is vegan and morbidly obese. She was thinner and healthier when she was vegetarian. She gained weight very rapidly on the 70% grains when she switched to vegan. It hasn't done her well. :(

_RAMONA: I read your "Paleo? Why?" blog last night and thought it was brilliant! I haven't had a chance to comment on it yet because I want to read through it again. It does seem you and I are on the similar theme at the moment!

Feel free to link what you like. :)

Comment edited on: 7/19/2012 5:41:56 PM

Report Inappropriate Comment
_RAMONA 7/19/2012 5:04PM

    Another GREAT blog entry... I can't tell you how much I appreciate your willingness to share your experience and knowledge. I have similar issues with people all over Spark bashing low-carb, Paleo... basically anything they don't really understand , or which hasn't produced the 'miracle cure' for their fat elimination issues (people who want to simply lose weight no matter how drive me around the bend, LOL)... and the backlash when you try to correct misperceptions... YIKES! It's so refreshing to read someone who is informed and fair.

I hope you don't mind (please say so if you do)... I suspect I'll be linking back here a lot... what we have to say seems to be dovetailing nicely at the moment!


Report Inappropriate Comment
JUSTBIRDY 7/19/2012 4:56PM

    When I was a vegetarian, I thought it was ok to eat more fat with cheese because I wasn't eating any meat fat. Unfortunately, I also thought that the vegetable oil used to cook my "organic stone-ground" corn tortilla chips was perfectly OK, and I ate lots of them. The real trouble for vegetarians is going out to eat. Unless you are at a salad bar or vegetarian eatery, you are just ordering whatever crap it is and leaving off the meat. So that is white bread with a pc of lettuce, a slab of cheese and no meat. Or, a fried wheat tortilla with grated lettuce, salsa and some beans. It is mostly devoid of nutrition.

Report Inappropriate Comment
VHALKYRIE 7/19/2012 4:42PM

    It's all gone! Need to be quicker next time!

Report Inappropriate Comment
NEILITHICMAN 7/19/2012 4:37PM

    That steak looks like it's cooked just the way I like it. Any chance of sending some this way?

Report Inappropriate Comment
VHALKYRIE 7/19/2012 2:47PM

    SALONKITTY: Low fat yogurts loaded with all those sugars are a landmine. Sometimes I have to back away from the message boards because they make my blood pressure rise (and I thought I cured that problem!). One girl said her registered dietician actually told her that the 'good outweighed the bad' in terms of yogurt versus the sugar. I saw a package of yogurt that had 29g sugar in it. A Snickers bar has 28g sugar. If they added probiotics to Snickers, would that make it a healthy breakfast? A RD would never propose Snickers is ok for a diabetic, right?

I make my own yogurt because I cannot find a brand of plain full fat yogurt that I like. I use non-fat Chobani as my starter, but I use full-fat milk for the yogurt base. OMG - Chobani with full-fat milk tastes out of this world - no sugar needed!

FITGIRL15: I decided I was going to stop buying skim milk, low-fat anything, and just buy the real stuff. I agree about the processed food crap. I think if people just buy the stuff on the outer edges of the supermarket - produce, meat, dairy - that the macronutrients and portions will fall right into place. That's how it works for me, anyway!

And yes! Veggies all day long! Well, except for breakfast? I don't know how to fit a veg in there. I can't wrap my mind around salad for breakfast! Maybe a "British Breakfast" with a tomato!

WOUBBIE: Cool! That was an unexpected experience when I went low carb. I had no idea there was such a thing as systemic candida infection! I had no idea that was the cause of my chronic sinus infection. It was a nightmare getting through, but it was so worth it.

Comment edited on: 7/19/2012 3:06:33 PM

Report Inappropriate Comment
WOUBBIE 7/19/2012 12:58PM

    Well done, once again! I'm sending a link to this to someone who has severe candida issues (and was recently diagnosed with celiac to boot!)

It's great to see your posts on the forums as well! Your experience is really illuminating!

Report Inappropriate Comment
FITGIRL15 7/19/2012 12:47PM

    If our society paid half as much attention to how their body responds to certain foods then they spend on the latest gadgets or celebrity gossip... people wouldn't have a problem with their weight.

Convenience foods, fad diets, advertising... it's all to blame!
I eat PLENTY of fat in my diet (oil, whole eggs, cheese) but I monitor portion... which I think is far more important to the average consumer then macronutrients!!! (IMHO)

PS... vegetables should be consumed with EVERY meal!!!

Comment edited on: 7/19/2012 12:47:47 PM

Report Inappropriate Comment
SALONKITTY 7/19/2012 11:26AM

    Another great blog, Vhalkyrie! I'm really enjoying your posts. I think you've made an excellent point about there being SO MUCH junk food out there that people aren't viewing as junk (either out of ignorance or not wanting to give up the 'treats'). Those low-fat or fat-free sugary yogurts are a killer....it took me a long time to realise those were not healthy yogurts at all.

I personally had a really hard time wrapping my head around the idea that I needed to eat FAT. I blogged about this briefly before, when I said I'd had my own "Faileo" version of Paleo. I thought I could eat low/no fat and high protein and that would work. Well, it DID work in practical terms, as I lost about 70 lbs, but I felt really awful and was battling sugar and carb cravings, as well as lots of hunger pangs. That way of eating and exercising was absolutely NOT sustainable, and I gained back 40 lbs. So here I am again. I think I've got it mostly right now. Eating fat makes all the difference in the world, and I am losing more weight with really no difficulty at all. I also am not having trouble sleeping, which I was when I was avoiding fat.

I also really like that this post ties in so nicely with your earlier post about the importance of reading books and following the instructions carefully.

Your Kaljitas look fantastic! I love using lettuce leaves as wraps. So much healthier than low carb wraps or tortillas, and I think wrapping stuff in lettuce just tastes better.


Report Inappropriate Comment
ANDREWS_MOM 7/19/2012 10:20AM

    Awesome blog!
While I don't follow a low carb diet, I believe all of what you say to be true.
I have several digestive diseases & the rec'd diet for gastroparesis is extremly high white carb diet (because your stomach is partially paralyzed and you "need" food that will pass through quickly) & extremly low fiber. I also have a very slow colon/intestines- diet for that is high fiber....
I took the meds the dr's gave and followed the diet- never got much relief at all & certainly didn't lose the last 20 pounds i wanted to shed. Earlier this year I developed the rare very serious side effects to the meds & had to stop taking it. At that point I realized i could not continue with their plan for treating. I stopped the rest of the stomach/inttestine meds (i still need lasix for edema & miralax daily) and decided to do an elimination type diet.
I found what most aggrevated my system & caused the bloating, nausea, vomitting, severe lethargy- were 2 main things- the additives & preservites & chemicals in processed foods & the highly refined carbs that they had me primarily living on.

I switched to mostly clean eating (about 70-80%)- i still have a small amount of processed items but almost everything is homemade. Ditched the low fat and went to the real verisons of most things (except milk-still use super skim) and added more real fats- olive oil, olives & avocados are daily staples now for me. I've been vegetarian for nearly 9 years but I still eat fish/shrimp.

Within 3 weeks of eating like this, I lost 15 pounds and my dr was amazed and wanted to know what i was doing :)

Since the high heat & humidity has come & stayed here- my gi issues have been flared intensly & have been bloated- but I now know this time it's an environmental factor and not something i'm eating.

I have no doubt you feel amazing & your energy levels are probably soaring. I wish you the very best with your healthy lifestyle!! :)

Report Inappropriate Comment
LYNDALOVES2HIKE 7/19/2012 10:16AM

    I'm in the 'learning' phase for low-carb so really enjoyed reading your blog today - thanks for the book suggestions [reading Protein Power now] and for sharing your real-life experience with the rest of us.
emoticon emoticon

Report Inappropriate Comment
VHALKYRIE 7/19/2012 10:14AM

    Nein.

(I can't speak either Korean or German, either!)

Report Inappropriate Comment
BOB240 7/19/2012 10:07AM

    "half Korean/half German"

Spielst du Baduk?

Report Inappropriate Comment


Seasonal Carb Cycling

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

One of the benefits of having a food journal that goes back 5 years is I can go back in time to see where I started, and where I am now.

The reason I joined Spark is because my weight loss stalled, and I wanted to lose more. And Spark is free!

Here's my very first day that I created an account on Spark and tracked my food.

July 3, 2007 Start weight: 135lbs
Breakfast: Cheerios, Plum, Granola bar | Calories: 218
Lunch: Baja fresh charboiled chicken, clementine | Calories: 352
Dinner: Turkey sausage, asparagus, corn, eggplant, sweet potato, bell pepper, halibut, tequila | Calories: 860
Snack: Low fat yogurt, plum, granola bar | Calories: 294
Calorie Total: 1725
Carbs: 219g | 55%
Fat: 30g | 17%
Protein: 112g | 28%

If we're going with calorie in-calorie out math, I'm a little calorie high, but the quality of food is pretty good. No fast food. No junk. Veggies, fruit, grains (Cheerios says its heart healthy!), and keeping fat low (because I was trying to follow the standard dietary advice). Shot of alcohol is ok in moderation, right? I packed too many calories at once at dinner, but hey! It was my first day!

Subsequent journal entries show that I dropped my average daily calories.

And it worked! My weight tracker shows that I lost 4 lbs in a month. Not bad!

However, checking my report in October 8, 2007, my weight jumped to 142lbs. Not good.

3 years later...

August 5, 2010 Start weight: 132
Breakfast: Banana, Cheerios | Calories: 177
Lunch: Carrots, dill pickle, lettuce, flank steak, potato, Izze soda | Calories: 543
Dinner: Carrots, tomatoes, peas, chicken thigh, Izze soda, bbq sauce | Calories: 289
Snack: Pineapple, watermelon | Calories: 125
Calories Total: 1134
Carbs: 176g | 64%
Fat: 16g | 13%
Protein: 63g | 23%

My weight report shows that I lost 3 lbs by October 1, 2010. 1.5lb per month. Not very impressive.

Sure, the Izze pop wasn't the healthiest choice, but calories in-calories out, right? The source of the calories doesn't matter, just the total calories, right?

(You know what I think of that. Good luck with that Twinkie diet.)

But it gets worse. According to my weight tracker, I weighed 138 after the holidays. A 9 lb gain since October. All of my work erased, and then some.

I think we can agree this was a yo-yo. If experts were to be believed, my food quality was above average (Pizza hut and potato chips aren't to blame). It did work for a time, then it didn't, and I rebounded. Fast. Over time, I couldn't lose as well on the same number of restricted calories.

(I'll skip comparison with my current results now because I want to wait a full 30 days before discussing.)

There was a study published recently that tested resting energy expenditure for people on low-fat, low-glycemic, and low-carb diets. This type of study has never been done before. What they basically did is forced all the participants to lose weight 10-15% of their body weight rapidly, put them on these diets, then recorded what happened to their maintenance metabolic rate. The result? Low-carb maintainers had the least decrease in resting energy expenditure; low-fat had the most; low-glycemic was in the middle. Low-carb maintainers burned 300 more calories at rest then the low-fat group. The 'metabolic advantage' goes to the low-carb group.

jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?ar
ticleid=1199154


I'm not going to say that this definitely answered why my metabolism continued to decline year after year, but the circumstantial evidence is intriguing. This isn't a long term study, so certainly there is more work to build on this.

Running with this idea, though, my personal long term data suggests a cumulative effect.

It occurred to me that 'seasonal carb cycling' may have better results for maintenance, and blunt the awful holiday weight gain. If we have a lot of weight to lose, then being able to resume where we left off makes the task more manageable. Slightly higher carb in the summer if we're more active may be less likely to pack on pounds, then shift into lower carb in the winter when we're less active. If we go by traditional farming cycles, grains and plants ARE less prevalent in the winter months. Pre industrial populations lived more heavily on animal protein during the winter months when plants and grains were inaccessible. Vegetables were pickled before refrigeration became common. Grains were stored in silos, but rationed moderately because it had to last all winter.

The thing that is clear to me from my long term journals is that high carb and low activity are a disaster.

  
  Member Comments About This Blog Post:

BILL60 7/19/2012 8:48AM

    Good for you. It's fun to look back and be able to identify mistakes and trends.

Report Inappropriate Comment
OPTIMIST1948 7/19/2012 4:57AM

    Valid points, all of them. I do better low carbing, but so much yummy ripe fruit now! Starches were the easiest food for me to cut out so they went first. Rarely eat breakfast cereal (although more lately because of heat). Good post!

Report Inappropriate Comment
NEILITHICMAN 7/18/2012 5:41PM

    That's funny, I had blueberries and yoghurt for brekkie too. eggs rock!! My sister has chickens so I generally go through plenty of eggs.

I try to eat about 300-400 of my 1900-2100 daily calories at breakfast then I'll have a morning snack of a couple of hundred calories mid morning. After lunch I'm usually not hungry and only eat about 300-400 calories for dinner.

Report Inappropriate Comment
VHALKYRIE 7/18/2012 4:50PM

    I don't eat that much more in the mornings. Cereal is just a terrible breakfast choice for me. I end up with an energy crash mid morning.

Typical breakfast this week has been an over easy egg, cup of homemade yogurt, and 50g blueberries. Similar calories, but much more satiety. I didn't eat until 1pm and that was only because I realized I should eat something.

I share my food tracker, so anyone is welcome to look at what I eat.

Comment edited on: 7/18/2012 4:51:46 PM

Report Inappropriate Comment
NEILITHICMAN 7/18/2012 4:41PM

    That's cool that you can go back that far. The other thing I would comment was it looked like you weren't eating nearly enough for breakfast. Almost all the info I've read agrees that you should be trying to get 25%-35% of your calories in the morning.

What kind of thing do you eat now on the low carb diet?

Comment edited on: 7/18/2012 4:44:19 PM

Report Inappropriate Comment
LYNDALOVES2HIKE 7/18/2012 3:40PM

    Thanks for posting the article link - my metabolism dropped so drastically over the years, it's alarming. Then again, I was eating low-fat foods and since switching to low-carb, my metabolism SEEMS to be recovering - at least, I've lost 20 lbs in 2 months eating MORE calories than I was eating before so REE seems to be the only explanation. Interesting how that works!
emoticon

Report Inappropriate Comment
VHALKYRIE 7/18/2012 3:09PM

    I've used various methods throughout the years, but all my historical info above came from the Spark food tracker.

Report Inappropriate Comment
CATH63 7/18/2012 2:39PM

    Do you keep a separate journal somewhere on Spark or can you get that much history from the food tracker?

Report Inappropriate Comment
VHALKYRIE 7/18/2012 2:05PM

    I drink wine and beer regularly, just a glass a night. Back in my early 30s...umm...let's just say I did a lot of things I didn't do in my 20s. ;)

I stopped drinking the Izze (sugars). I originally intended this to be a blog about why calorie source does matter, but it went in a slightly different direction. I've stopped drinking diet soda as well (blog a few weeks ago about triggering hunger).

I'm struggling with the husband on the fruit smoothies. =/

Comment edited on: 7/18/2012 2:10:52 PM

Report Inappropriate Comment
EATNBOOGERS 7/18/2012 1:57PM

    I just mention it because it's a struggle I've had with my husband. For what it's worth, I also rarely drink (I just don't tolerate it well), and I've never had a taste for soda, either. I'll await the brown rice/quinoa!

Report Inappropriate Comment
VHALKYRIE 7/18/2012 1:40PM

    No argument. That's why I ditched them. ;)

And I admit I am taking a pot-shot at the calorie in-calorie out source-doesn't-matter argument. I did lose weight initially just dropping calories, but then the trend became one of declining health.

Minimally processed whole grains (brown rice, quinoa) didn't do much better for me, which I'll discuss later.

Comment edited on: 7/18/2012 1:56:38 PM

Report Inappropriate Comment
EATNBOOGERS 7/18/2012 1:39PM

    One thing I will say... I think Cheerios (and any cereal, pretty much) are crap. They might be "whole grain", but they're highly processed, highly packaged, overpriced crap. Same with granola bars. I'll shut up there. ;-)

Report Inappropriate Comment
GRACIOUSGRAPE 7/18/2012 12:57PM

    Interesting! I am currently having to watch my carbs and glycemic due to high glucose levels in my blood, along with high cholesterol. Certainly know that I have to increase my exercise, but is difficult to count not only calories but also carb, protein, fat. Easy to do with Spark but it seems to take a lot of time to do all this journaling, when school, work, and taking care of 2 grandkids takes up so much of my time. But I do know it is the only way that I will be able to track and get a handle on the foods I eat. Thanks for sharing. Will certainly keep seasonal carb cycling in mind!

Report Inappropriate Comment


First Page  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 Last Page