HOUNDLOVER1   16,509
15,000-19,999 SparkPoints
HOUNDLOVER1's Recent Blog Entries

Gary Taubes Interview - 3 parts on youtube

Sunday, February 19, 2012

I decided to front-load these links for now rather than reviewing the book:




Here is another link to another talk:

I hope this will give access to some of the critical information for people who can't read the book right away. emoticon

  Member Comments About This Blog Post:

HOUNDLOVER1 2/19/2012 2:18PM

There is a lot of research that went into Gary Taubes book. For the more complete, but also much more time-consuming version read his original book "Good Calories - Bad Calories" which has much more detailed endnotes that have all the references.
As far as everyone being different in their nutritional needs, that is true, but leaves out the fact that some substances are bad for everyone and should not be consumed even in moderation. Usually these are things that are not natural foods and our body does not know how to handle them. Modern grains, especially wheat, are not natural any more because of the intensive breeding that has taken place to change them. This is similar for instance to breeding in dogs originally descended from wolves. A Chihuahua or Toy Poodle is not able to survive in the wild like a wolf. The genetic changes are just too great.
Take a look at this blog by the author of "Wheatbelly" for more of an explanation:
Hope this explains things better.

Comment edited on: 2/19/2012 2:26:11 PM

Report Inappropriate Comment
KENDRACARROLL 2/19/2012 1:11PM

    I have not read the book, but I went ahead and watched the YouTube interview.
Frankly I'm puzzled. MIght have to watch it again, since I couldn't seem to grasp some of his answers. (Maybe the fact that I watched this at 4:00 might have something to do with it :))

So he promotes low carb (guess you would have to read the book to get exact spec as to how many carbs that would be) in order to prevent insulin spikes.

This intrigued me, don't know much about it, and I'm planning on studying up on insulin some more.

What struck me as strange is that his entire interview sounded like his 'science' was merely based on hypothesis, assumptions he made while living this lifestyle.

Again there might be more to it and he might back some of this up in his book.

Trouble is, there are so many hypothetical life style and diet suggestions out there, and every claim probably has some truth to is somewhere, whom do you believe? What do you believe?

I believe there just is no one size fits all and it is up to the individual to tailor all this by what fits them.
It certainly is a confusing world out there.

Report Inappropriate Comment
HOUNDLOVER1 2/19/2012 12:31PM

    He,he, haven't even had time to watch them myself, so you can tell I'm starting to trust this guy. emoticon
I'm wondering if it's worth it to start a Spark team about this book or if the existing paleo/low carb are sufficient. What do you think?

Report Inappropriate Comment
DEC2DEC 2/19/2012 12:03PM

    Thank you -- can't wait to watch!

Report Inappropriate Comment
KANOE10 2/19/2012 8:53AM

    Thanks for these. I am so excited as I just finished his book. What a nice thing for you to do! Will let you know what I think.


Report Inappropriate Comment
CARRIE1948 2/19/2012 8:09AM

    Thanks for these

Report Inappropriate Comment
SAFETYSUE 2/19/2012 2:36AM

    Great blog, thanks for sharing these!
emoticon emoticon emoticon

Report Inappropriate Comment

3rd day low-carb and 1st run low-carb

Saturday, February 18, 2012

I was wondering if my energy would be lower than normal. But it does not look like it.
I decided to take it easy and ran for only 45 minutes. I covered almost 3.6 miles, average pulse was 135, average speed was 4.7 mph.
Eating has been more frequent today with three meals and two snacks. I think my carbs were around 60-70 grams today.
I have not had any significant side effects from eating low-carb yet, except maybe I was a little tired the last two days in the afternoons.
There are still some questions about "Why we get fat" so I'm hoping to go through the book again this weekend and write down some questions.
I hope to do one more long run sometime in the next 3-4 days before I start tapering. Tomorrow we may get some snow so maybe I'll finally have a chance to try my snowshoes.

  Member Comments About This Blog Post:

TAMPATINK67 2/18/2012 10:25AM

    Thanks for blogging your educational journey - some things are confirming what I've learned/experienced, and others are new for me as well and helping me anticipate potential factors for my future as I continue to loose weight and become more active.

Having a diabetic family (serious genetic disaster), I'd always been fairly certain that my genetic profile left me disadvantaged from a hormonal perspective. Looking at the foods that were our family favorites though, I really started to wonder about nature vs nuture. This eating style has been a dream come true for me - I feel fabulous, no cravings, and loosing weight without much effort from exercise. Changing my eating patterns may indeed help me find a healthy weight and lifestyle that I never dreamed could be possible....

As I continue toward my goal weight, I want to make exercise a larger part of my life and have heard different things from athletes with reference to energy requirements. Obviously I will first need to define my fitness goals, then determine the type(s) of exercise to achieve these goals, then identify the energy requirements to support goals.......

All of this is very foreign for a woman who has been obese for her entire adult life - but I'm willing to learn - from personal experience, scientific experiments, and from the personal experiences of others curious about learning more about how our incredible bodies actually work.

Thanks again!

Report Inappropriate Comment
NDTEACHER1 2/18/2012 10:23AM

    Good for you!

Report Inappropriate Comment

Gary Taubes book

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

I am almost done reading the book by Gary Taubes "Why we get fat and what to do about it" which is a simplified version of his much more comprehensive book "Good Calories, Bad Calories". Gary Taubes talks about the connection between overeating and weight gain in a different way than what most of us are used to hearing: Prompted by hormones, primarily insulin, our body will store calories we eat, regardless of whether they are carbs or fat, in the fat cells in our body. Insulin can cause this to happen regardless of whether we need these calories for energy at the moment or not. According to Taubes this means that if our insulin levels are high enough and our body needs to use energy we will get hungry because all the available calories are put away in the fat cells where they are unavailable for use. Therefore obesity is the cause of overeating, not overeating the cause of obesity.
Taubes makes the comparison of a young person growing. To say that a child is growing because they are overeating is obviously ridiculous. We assume that growth and physical changes during adolescence are the result of hormonal changes and that teenagers eat a lot BECAUSE they are growing.
Increasing insulin levels are caused by consuming carbohydrates and those carbs with the highest glycemic index are considered the worst. There are other reasons given for why some people seem to store a lot of calories they eat in fat tissue while other people seem to deposit them in muscle tissue where they are used for energy. Genetics play a role here.
When I look at my dogs I know that this is true. My whippets were bred for racing and they have probably no more than 3 percent body fat. People who don't know and understand the breed will occasionally ask questions about how often and how much I feed them and are suprised to hear that these dogs eat huge amounts and get one of the most expensive dog foods on the market.
My Beagle Honey is on the other end of the spectrum. When she came to us she weighed 47 lbs. at 2 years of age. I know that she was part of a research colony for a nutritional study but I don't know what her diet consisted of before we got her. I put her on a low-fat, high-fiber diet and fed her small portions, 1/4 cup of food twice a day. This was 8 years ago and I had never questioned the wisdom of cutting fat and calories and increasing fiber and activity for weight loss. In this case my approach worked. Honey lost 20 lbs. in 3 months, rivaling "Biggest Loser" results. She is now on 1 cup of high-quality food a day, about 30% carbs, 40%fat and 30%protein. Not ideal for a dog but she maintains her weight with the help of portion-control and regular exercise. Beagles commonly have hypothyroidism but this one does not, she's just a glutton who would eat 40 lbs. of food a day if I let her and regain all the weight she lost very quickly. Unlike the whippets she is not very fast (well, still faster than I am) but she can go all day for 20 miles or more easily, an incredible endurance athlete. Most of my other dogs are also more built for endurance and have a fairly slow metabolism which allows them to maintain weight on most foods. Dogs, more than many other species have been bred for extremes in looks and in function and are a good example to see how diverse their needs are in the area of nutrition. There is no reason to assume that there aren't major differences in the ways people's metabolism functions. I know some people who will not put on weight regardless of what they eat. Of course this does not mean that they are healthy regardless of what they eat, but calories in-calories out is not the same for everyone. Most people with thyroid issues struggle far more to lose weight and keep it off. There are dozens of hormones in our bodies that may play a role in what our bodies do with food. Jillian Michael's book "Master your metabolism" is a good introduction to endocrinology for people who are not in the medical profession and explains how more than 10 different hormones affect our weight.
I'm not sure where exactly I'm going with all of this, I want to do more research. But I think I have enough evidence to give a low-carb diet a try over the next few weeks. I'll make it even a little lower-carb than originally planned, shooting for under 50 grams of carbs. What percentage of my fat and protein intake will be animal (dairy, meat) and what percentage will be plant-based (nuts, coconut, olive oil, avocado) I don't know yet. But I will cut out all grain and beans and some fruit for a few weeks and see what happens. I will also continue to eat large amounts and a wide variety of raw vegetables and will eat mostly organic food, animal-protein from pasture-fed animals.

  Member Comments About This Blog Post:

HOUNDLOVER1 3/5/2012 6:01PM

I think going off a low-carb diet will lead most people to regain the weight. Eating low-carb IS a normal diet, while the typical North American Diet is not "normal" if you look at results. I do think that some people can increase the carbs they eat a little bit when they reach their goal weight while other people have messed up their body enough to where they have to stay on low-carb for the rest of their lives to stay healthy. Also, some people need to exercise more to get to a healthy weight. Eating low-carb will allow your body to utilize the energy (calories) in your muscle cells rather than storing them in your fat cells. Once you eat low-carb you can actually benefit from exercising by drawing on your body's fat stores to fuel your workouts. emoticon

Report Inappropriate Comment
JACKAAT 3/5/2012 2:10PM

  I really liked the book and I am in the process of reading it again. Reality is it isn't for everyone. My office mate and I both read Taubes book and started following the low carb diet. I lost 15 pounds rather quickly and my office mate lost 20. I went on vacation and went back to my normal eating. I did not regain any weight (it has been 6 months) however I find it is harder to give up the carbs the second time around. My office mate has religiously stayed with the low card diet but has not lost any more weight.
If one thing worked for everyone the diet industry wouldn't make a fortune off those desperate to try the latest and greatest.
Find what works for you and stay with it. We didn't get this way over night and nothing is going to take it away in a few weeks or days.
I was raised that if something was worth having it was worth working for and nothing worth having is going to be given to you for free.
Find what works for you and stick with it. You're worth it!

Comment edited on: 3/5/2012 2:55:19 PM

Report Inappropriate Comment
DIVEGODDESS 2/21/2012 1:57AM

    Your reference to the dog breeds is a really great way of explaining the difference needs we all have in terms of genetics. That's why low carb does not work for me and I can gain muscle on high starchy carbs while many people can not. The important thing is to keep trying different thing until you find something that works!

Report Inappropriate Comment
PATTYCAKE17 2/17/2012 11:54AM

    This is such an informative blog. I wrote down the name of the book and author, and will add it to my reading research list. I also love researching health and nutritional information, and if i were younger and starting over, I would definitely enter the health field. Where were you going with this blog, you ask? Well, right at me, thank you very much. My blood work just came back with high sugar numbers, so I am going to nutritionally avert Diabetes, because i know i can, with the help of the Lord, and getting a good education on the subject. I love to follow your blogs. Yoiu're such a sharing person, God bless you for that. emoticon emoticon

Report Inappropriate Comment
MZLADY77 2/17/2012 9:42AM

    Thanks for sharing! emoticon

Report Inappropriate Comment
BOBBIENORTHERN1 2/17/2012 9:31AM

  Sure makes a lot of sense to me. But, please remember we do need some carbs and some grains, but, veggies are carbs aren't they?

It is also very true we have to learn our own personal needs for losing weight because we are all different and one plan for losing weight does not fit all.

For me so far it has been trial and error figuring out what works for me that's why I like this blog because it is so true and thanks for sharing this.

Report Inappropriate Comment
MARTHASPARKS 2/16/2012 7:43PM

    Your blogs are always interesting and informative. I'm cutting my car s, too because I'm stuck. I have always recognized that I had to keep my carb to protein ratio lower than Spark said but this helps me understand why.

Report Inappropriate Comment
-LINDA_S 2/16/2012 7:17PM

    Very interesting stuff! We probably are all quite different like the dogs. And yet another book I should read! I'll add it to the list...

Report Inappropriate Comment
4A-HEALTHY-BMI 2/16/2012 6:57PM

    It is hard to get less than 100 g of carbs.

I eat no grains or starchy vegetables or legumes or added sugar and only two pieces of fruit a day (medium sized apples) and lots of leafy greens and I usually end up with ~100-150g of carbs anyway. About 30-50g of them are fiber, and about 60-80g are sugars.

I will be interested to hear what you are actually eating, in order to manage less than 100 g of carbs per day.

Comment edited on: 2/16/2012 6:59:52 PM

Report Inappropriate Comment
HOUNDLOVER1 2/16/2012 12:47PM

    Thank you for all the feedback. emoticon
I hope to find time later today to respond to some of your very interesting comments individually.

Report Inappropriate Comment
KWILLIAMS55 2/16/2012 12:26PM

    emoticon for sharing.

Report Inappropriate Comment
DEC2DEC 2/16/2012 11:12AM

    Great book -- and I'm excited by the changes you're making!!

Report Inappropriate Comment
FREELADY 2/16/2012 11:11AM

    Wow, this is fascinating! Thanks!

It has been true in my experience that keeping the carbs low takes care of the hunger problem. After Noah's Flood, the Creator told people to eat meat, and I am finding it very satisfying (with non-starchy vegetables and some fruit).

I have been doing the Leptin Reset prescription recommended by Jack Kruse for a month now; I do use a small amount of raw milk, cheese, and yogurt. My weight is holding steady as predicted for this stage, but I feel great. Joint pain is gone and energy is excellent (I'm in my fifties).

I'm very glad to get this info and book referral with more data about the insulin mechanism. You are a great researcher and I hope you'll keep passing this valuable stuff on to us!

Report Inappropriate Comment
HEALTHY4ME 2/16/2012 8:45AM

    I have started that since Jan and was doing great. I still am proud to say haven't had any grains other than every 3rd day have a med bowl of oatmeal.... I am struggling to get enough protein and fat and in the right ratio. This past week or so I have been very hungry more for junky stuff and am tired even after sleeping for 8-9 hrs.
So will get back down to the proper carbs, as I am getting too high, eeven though I don't eat grains finding too many higher carb/GI index fruit I guess.
Anyway do feel better, was losing wt only a lbs a week most time but will see Sat how I have done I would say this has been my worst week. Which is really a great thing for me as it is still way way better than before. I read why we get fat and agree, am waiting for a few more similar books from library.
Also I do very limited exercise other than house renos. Just got my knee brace which I am hoping will allow me to walk better and further.
HUGS and keep letting us know how this works out.

Report Inappropriate Comment
KANOE10 2/16/2012 8:03AM

    I just finished reading that book also. I learned a great deal. I have been eating low carb for over a year and like it. Where I have trouble with his book is that he promotes high fat foods like butter, cream, and high fat cheese.

Nice blog. Have a great day.

Report Inappropriate Comment
CONRADBURK 2/16/2012 6:10AM

    Very interesting blog! I am reading "Why We Get Fat" too! I just started reading it and like it a lot! Good luck with the low carb diet and getting rid of beans and wheat! If you do both these things, you will lose weight very fast, possibly too fast! The "sweet spot" for loosing weight is 50 to 100 g of carbs per day according to Mark Sisson in "Primal Blueprint."

Keep sparking!
emoticon emoticon emoticon emoticon emoticon

Report Inappropriate Comment
APED7969 2/16/2012 5:18AM

    I like your comparison to your dogs. I'm a vet so regularly have the 'your dog is too fat' conversation and constantly see similar dogs from the same family who are fed the same amount of the same food and one will be fit and the other obese. I also consistently see fit owners with fit animals and fat owners with fat animals, it isn't the rule but it is interesting to note.

Report Inappropriate Comment
EBLOOMING 2/16/2012 1:07AM

    emoticonInteresting...lower those carbs..fruit...wheat/breads/sugar..
.sounds like a winner. emoticon

Report Inappropriate Comment
JANETELIZABETH1 2/16/2012 12:51AM

    Thanks Birgit for your thoughts on this subject.
I agree we do have very complicated bodies and that's why 'one size' does not fit all.
I'll be interested to hear how your experiment on 'you' goes. IMO any radical change will have an effect and you should see some results. I think most people can't sustain it for too long if it's totally against their 'normal, or desired' way of eating. Good to hear you have healthy dogs and you've taken the trouble to watch over them too.

Report Inappropriate Comment
AMYNYNJ 2/15/2012 9:51PM

    Great analogy to use the dogs as an example. emoticon

Report Inappropriate Comment

Long run - still contemplating grains - more raw veggies

Monday, February 13, 2012

Today I ran 11 miles, average heart rate 135, total time 2hrs. 31 min., avg. speed about 4.4 mph, slight improvement over last week. The weather was too cold for me taste and not as sunny as I had hoped. Afterwards I got pretty cold and tired and ended up taking a nap for about an hour with a hot water bottle and some cuddly dogs helping me to warm back up. I found that I really don't need water on the run if I hydrate well ahead of time in these temperatures. Total calories burned about 1400. I'm still trying to decide if I want to only do one more long run next weekend or 2 over the next 2 weekends. The second alternative would give me only one week to taper but I have the feeling that because I'm running at a low heart rate that 1 week may be enough. I'm open to recommendations though.

I'm still enjoying grains and some lower-carb sugar alternatives. I'm planning to take a look at the glycemic index and glycemic load of a variety of grains, beans and sweeteners this coming week.
We've been eating far more raw vegetables this week and I enjoy the taste. I'm not used to having to spend so much time in the kitchen, though. Will have to see if I can get my daughter involved in some more food prep.

  Member Comments About This Blog Post:

MAGGIE101857 2/13/2012 6:29AM

    Great run!!! emoticon

Eating healthy does take a lot of time - and work! I feel like I if I'm not at the office, then I am in the kitchen whipping up yet another healthy meal for my BH and myself. Fortunately for me, I fit in the time for my workouts before anything else!!

If it were me, I would do just one more long run and then start to taper. I am not a fast runner either....but I think I would apply the same "rules"....! emoticon

Report Inappropriate Comment
CONRADBURK 2/13/2012 5:51AM

    I am impressed by your athletic ability! That is a long run! There is a book by Loren Cordain called "The Paleo Diet for Athletes" that may be able to give you some healthy alternatives for your carbs. I have not read the book as I am not an amateur athlete, but I believe he advises to eat things like sweet potatoes, which are a higher carb vegetable that is a better alternative to potatoes.

I am happy with just walking for exercise. At age 57, a two-hour hike for me is a good workout!
emoticon emoticon emoticon

Report Inappropriate Comment

I made a tracking mistake - this is annoying

Saturday, February 11, 2012

When I tracked my food for 2 days in mid-January I did not check that all the macronutrients of the foods I listed had actually been recorded, big mistake! I found out that they were not. On one day I ate 3 cups of yogurt and my protein was low. It turned out that the system did not automatically provide the macronutrients, just the calories, even though the brand and type I ate came up. This makes the nutrition tracker completely useless in my opinion. I just don't have time to double-check everything and enter it by hand. Fortunately I don't need to rely on it. There must be a better way than the Spark nutrition tracker. Even using an old-fashioned book would be easier.
Thank God with eating lower carb I can just follow basic principles without tracking.

  Member Comments About This Blog Post:

NDTEACHER1 2/14/2012 8:44PM

    I don't pay the tracker much heed either. According to it, I am always under on protein and carbs and I know that is not the case.

Report Inappropriate Comment
EILISH99 2/12/2012 1:45PM

    I use another site to track my foods. I really hate that the tracker here will not show me the fiber intake for my foods, or the net carbs. Those are the important things to me. But it is a pain to have to use two different places to keep track of things.

Report Inappropriate Comment
PATTYCAKE17 2/12/2012 9:54AM

    Mistakes are good when we learn from them. Sounds like you aren't alone in the tracking errors. I used to make poor choices on my Weight Watchers menus, but because I tracked, I learned from them, and have gone on to do much better. Hope everyone's suggestions will help you. emoticon

Report Inappropriate Comment
ORGANIC811LFRV 2/12/2012 9:24AM

    Eating raw vegan you don't need to use the tracker. The tracker is primarily for those eating "healthier" and still not eating real 100% nutritional food choices. Sorry but very true.

Dairy robs the body of calcium hon. Calcium is taken from the bones to nutralize the acidic load given to the body from the dairy. Also dairy contains casein a known carcinogen. I'd prefer to hear people using soy - organic of course! - far more than any dairy.

Calcium is plentiful in the plant kingdom. Eat enough of that and you won't have any calcium deficiency. Also, have you ever heard of anyone dieing from cacium or protein deficiency? Nope! It's all promoted by the meat and dairy people to buy more of their toxic crud.

Sorry I vented. LOL


Report Inappropriate Comment
KIM--POSSIBLE 2/12/2012 8:53AM

    Sorry that happened, I know it is frustrating. When a food is entered by another member, often everything isn't there. It takes a little more time, but I do pull up the entire nutrition info and check it against my package to make sure it is the same thing and everything is there. I usually find that there is at least 1 that is the same, though I may have to look at a couple of them first. Once you get the hand of entering foods, it doesn't take that long. It is time consuming, but I have found it worth the time.

My time is limited, with kids, work, grad school, and other responsibilities, but I found that, when I didn't track, my weight went up and I felt bad. I wasn't eating any more or that much worse, but I wasn't conscious of my carb and sodium intake, and those two things make a huge difference for me. Spark breaks it down for me so I don't have to try to remember ever little detail throughout the day.

Keep tracking and making those healthy choices! You are doing great!

Report Inappropriate Comment
CONRADBURK 2/12/2012 7:48AM

    The SparkPeople tracker is excellent! It is so awesome! I noticed the same thing about ground sirloin. I noticed that the ground sirloin entry did not have the vitamins and minerals entered. This is the case for many of the food entries. I had to select the sirloin, which had all the nutrients, including the zinc. Many of the entries for food nutrients are taken off the Nutrition Information on the back of the package, which is not complete. I would suggest that in the case of yogurt you select the closest one and go with that. The first entries that show up on the list are the complete ones and the following ones are incomplete and have been entered by other sparkers. It is not difficult to add a food entry, and I have done so on several occasions, though my entries have been incomplete. I suggest that you not give up on the Nutrient Tracker because a certain food is not listed. If you think about it, the Food Tracker is a marvelous invention! I love tracking and have learned so much from using it and from my SparkPeople friends. Thanks so much to all of you!
emoticon emoticon emoticon

Report Inappropriate Comment
MAGGIE101857 2/12/2012 7:25AM

    Good comments all! I agree that most people are initially focusing on the calories in, calories out....and unless you have other health issues, you may not be focused on the "details". I think that comes later in the journey, and for everyone it is different. I started using MyFitnessPal over the weekend - it has a scanner and pulls up so much information - it was very very interesting to look at the nutrients the last two days and see where I stacked up (calories great but was shocked to see my sodium since I don't add salt to anything)...quite an eye opener!!!

Spark isn't perfect and it seems that in the last week, many people are commenting on their frustration with the nutrition tracking. I think the advantage to this site is meeting all of you and being able to share what we are learning along the way! Hopefully everyone will stay on board and supplement where needed! emoticon

Report Inappropriate Comment
HOUNDLOVER1 2/11/2012 9:58PM

    I've learned from all the comments. Thank you.
For me it would be the most important to track carbs since I believe it is carbs that matter the most whether someone is successful in losing weight. For some people sodium is very important. I like the idea of tracking vitamins but it would not work because vitamins are better absorbed from some foods than from others and in some cases not at all from supplements. This is true for some minerals as well. If in doubt natural foods are probably the best if you can find them unpolluted.

Report Inappropriate Comment
EJOY-EVELYN 2/11/2012 7:06PM

    I hear you! I check each item I place in my "favorites" so that the complete nutrient content is in tact . . . especially for the seven key nutrients I track the most. A lot of the items people enter may or may not have sodium, and I really want to get as accurate a listing as possible. This is what makes this tracker so much better than Weight Watchers as I want this total food content, not just what points I have eaten.

My biggest regret is that our labeling does not require total vitamin content. If it that important to me, I'll key in my own variation of a product based on whole foods listed on a nutritional analysis web site. (I keyed in my own egg white (33 grams) for just such reasons -- however, this takes time to do properly.)

Comment edited on: 2/11/2012 7:08:16 PM

Report Inappropriate Comment
-LINDA_S 2/11/2012 6:16PM

    Dontcha just hate that? It's like the almighty calorie is the only thing that counts! I was just trying to find some kind of Thai food to put on my tracker for dinner, and they all just listed calories under the ones that said Thai food estimate. I don't care about the calories! So I ended up with something that had a bunch of carbs and put it on anyway. At least it had all the macronutrients. It might be hard to go low-carb at a Thai place anyway, but I'll try. And at least I can be dairy and whet-free without much problem.

Report Inappropriate Comment
KENDRACARROLL 2/11/2012 3:04PM

    Birgit, people who are just starting out probably have enough to do by just counting calories :) At least that's how it was for me. The rest comes later, after you gain some experience and more knowledge.

Report Inappropriate Comment
LISEIGHT 2/11/2012 3:03PM

    I too just quickly check if I need to use someone else's input. I have such a huge stock of stuff I have entered myself as favourite that I rarely need it!
I know a fair bit about nutrition too, but I just like the ese of having it all calculated adn tracked for me, on this one site. The whole idea of tracking somewhere else and the time that would take, hoooo gives me shivers!

Report Inappropriate Comment
HOUNDLOVER1 2/11/2012 1:43PM

you are right, I don't need the nutrition tracker but I understand that it is important for a lot of people.
Kricket, I have heard good things about the tracker on livestrong.com as well. Just wanted to share this because I figured I was not the only one who had trouble with it.
I certainly don't want to discourage anyone from tracking, just wish it were easier. People who are just staring on their weight-loss journey have enough problems to solve already. emoticon

Report Inappropriate Comment
SEDGEY 2/11/2012 1:17PM

    Whenever using the tracker and choosing an entry input by a member, I always do a quick check on the "view nutritional info" button to make sure that all the information was entered. If not, I use another one.

Report Inappropriate Comment
MARTHASPARKS 2/11/2012 12:19PM

    Birgit, you know enough about nutrition that you don't need to use the tracker. It's beneficial for people who need to track to stay on track, for those learning about nutrition, and those trying to modify their eating habits for weight loss. You don't really fit in any of those groups

Report Inappropriate Comment
KENDRACARROLL 2/11/2012 12:14PM

    I use the nutrition tracker as a general guideline.
Many member-entered foods on SP have incomplete info.
Plus, do you really know that food labels are accurate?
Check out the tracker at livestrong.com, maybe you'll like that one better.

Report Inappropriate Comment
TAMPATINK67 2/11/2012 12:11PM

    I understand the frustration. Yesterday when I recorded the Spaghetti Squash Marinara dish from Ruby Tuesdays, I found a few other Spark people had already recorded the dish. When I looked at my final day, I was low on carbs (and that's a vegetarian dish...). The person who recorded it entered only calories. I went to the company website for the full nutritionals, re-entered calories and macronutrients provided, and the day made more sense.

I guess it's like any other database that allows end-users to input items - garbage in, garbage out!

I'd unfortunately learned this lesson a few months ago, but guess I got lazy about pressing the "nutritional info" button under the add to tracker button (to see if the other uderhas added macros or calories only) when the item was clearly entered by another user (USERNAME will be in parenthesis) after the product name/description.

Comment edited on: 2/11/2012 12:14:03 PM

Report Inappropriate Comment
PCOLAGATOR 2/11/2012 12:10PM

    All the nutrition information that Sparkpeople provides is correct and complete. If you chose to use information created by a user then you have to deal with the possibilities of inaccuracies

Report Inappropriate Comment

First Page  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 Last Page