![]() ![]()
![]()
![]()
An Ode to My MumSunday, May 09, 2010
My mother was born in 1929 in Windsor, Ontario where she lived until she was 9 years old. On the day that she was born, her identical twin sister, Barbara was also born. And, interestingly enough, they were symmetrical. They were each born blind in one eye. My mum was blind in her left eye and Aunt Barbara was born blind in her right eye. When they got older (over 50), they both became deaf in opposing ears. And, there was something symmetrical about their ovaries, too, but I don't remember what. ![]()
|
TRAINOF4
5/15/2010 5:13PM
![]() |
![]() |
I loved reading about your mom & your childhood. How fun and interesting. Are the books your parents wrote still in circulation? I'd love to read them. It's always fascinating to learn about other peoples' families.
Report Inappropriate Comment |


JHADZHIA
5/9/2010 9:24PM
![]() |
![]() |
Your Mom has had an interesting life! Unfortunately, it always seems the teen years are hardest on relationships with the parents. At least you were able to mend fences later on and enjoy going on some trips together. That was just awful your Mom's sister's family being like that toward her (and here I always thought the British were all about manners) Glad it opened your eyes!! At least you were close in her final years. You have memories to cherish, even as it makes you sad on this special day for Moms.. I don't take any day I have with my Mom for granted.. Your birthday is one day before my brother's! Report Inappropriate Comment |


CONNIELEE54
5/9/2010 4:33PM
![]() |
![]() |
This was BEAUTIFUL! I was so enamoured as your Mom's eyesight and mine were quite similar, and there were also several other interesting parallels. When I first got my glasses at aged 7, the first things I remember delighting in were the pebbles on the ground, blades of grass and the leaves in the trees! (Believe me, when U discover them for the first time they are so exciting, lovely and awesome!!!) I was a teacher, too,and am just retired. My daughter and I were enjoying reading this blog, about you, your Mom, and your travels, as we also wish to see at least, England, Ireland. Scotland and Wales...and any other places we can eventually get to...!!!! I loved my Mom dearly and shared a little about her on one of the Idaho Team's Discussion Boards, just today. I feel like I didn't respect her as much as I should have during some of my teenage years, so I hear what you are saying, there. My siblings and I share similar birthdays with yours,except I am a bit older as I was born in '54. My daughter and I were both saying how it was a good thing that you moved close to your Mum when she became ill--you got to be close to her in her last year. Good, God's blessings on you for being there for her!! Thank you for this very lovely and interesting tribute. Here's wishing a Happy Mother's Day to YOU!! Report Inappropriate Comment |


I know that I have struggled to understand why SparkPeople has given me the range that they did especially since I find it so hard to lose weight with that range. But, that said, I do more or less try to stick with it and in the last 2-1/2 years, I've lost 11 pounds. Do I wish that I was the type of person who could lose 50 pounds a year? Absolutely! But, is that realistic for me seeing that I have a chronic disease (rheumatoid arthritis) for which I take several drugs that may cause weight gain and since I'm in menopause and my metabolism has slowed down considerably? So, I should be happy with what I have.
But, I do have concerns about some of my team members and their calorie range. I have one member on my team who appears to regularly eat less than 1200 calories. Research shows that people who regularly eat less than 1200 calories daily may initially lose a lot of weight but soon their bodies will enter starvation mode and the weight loss will slow down or completely stop because their bodies are storing fat so that they don't die. Here's what SparkPeople says:
The SparkPeople program will NOT allow any female to eat less than 1,200 calories daily or any male to eat less than 1,500 calories daily.
When calories drop too low (usually below 1,200 calories for women and 1,500 calories for men), your body’s protection mechanism switches on because the body thinks it is starving. In order to conserve energy, the body lowers your metabolism and you will not burn calories as quickly. This results in a slower weight loss rate, or sometimes prohibits any weight loss from occurring.
At SparkPeople we call this “Starvation Mode”. When your caloric intake falls below these levels, it is also extremely difficult to obtain all the nutrients that your body needs for health and survival. These very low calorie intakes can also lead to other health problems such as eating disorders, gout, gallstones, and heart complications.
So, I hope that the team members that are doing this have a look at this complete article from SparkPeople and figure out what they should really be eating:
www.sparkpeople.com/resource/calorie
_calculation101.asp


TRAINOF4
5/3/2010 1:30AM
![]() |
![]() |
It is indeed very hard to make those big changes to our bodies when we're already battling chronic disease. I'm guilty of not eating enough on a daily basis. And it's my meds that do it - I often have no appetite or feel too sick to eat. And sometimes when I DO eat I end up throwing up anyway. It's really hard to get those calories in & I know it's what's slowing down my own weight loss. Thank you for reminding us ofthe importance of FOOD! Report Inappropriate Comment |


LDAWSON61
5/2/2010 9:29PM
![]() |
Congratulations on what you have accomplished! Yes, like you, it seems like the weight is coming off slowly, but it is coming off and should stay off. Best of luck continuing your journey!
Report Inappropriate Comment |


JHADZHIA
5/2/2010 4:50PM
![]() |
![]() |
I know where you are coming from Joanna. My weight went off slowly too. The people who are going too low in calories justify it by saying they are really short, fine boned etc. Time will tell. I am really quite rigid staying in the range. If I see I am under, I will eat something to make it up, even if I don't feel like it! 1440 -1790 is fairly easy to stay in.
Report Inappropriate Comment |


JACOBSS914
5/2/2010 3:24PM
![]() |
![]() |
Way to go Joanna call us out on the carpet, LOL. No in reality you are correct and I love your concern about your team members. So way to go for being a caring and compassionate team leader. I have fought with this, also, and am now at 1950-2300 which seems like a lot but I think it is closer to where I needed to be. I had my calorie burn rate tested about a year ago, and it was at 2750 to support my body, so the 500 down, is 2250. Now if it would just let me break the 240 lbs., mark I have been fighting for 3 months I would be happy. Mentally this 240 thing is really getting to me. RA is a tough one as you know, but way to go on sticking with the program. Report Inappropriate Comment |


P0KERS0PH
5/2/2010 3:03PM
![]() |
![]() |
I too would be concerned if I knew anyone that ate that low. It's unhealthy, and will ultimately do more harm than good over a long period.
Report Inappropriate Comment |

