I do the same thing. I don't use the raw entry because there is no weight measurement. Depending on the size of the dice in the potato a cup can vary wildly. I also use this website when I can't find anything close: http://ndb.nal.usda.gov/index.html
You probably won't get exact for crockpot potatoes, but I think baked is a good substitute.
I use the entry: potato, raw I can then enter by size or by cup measurement. If I roast with oil, then add that as a seperate entry.
Fitness Minutes: (14,252)
9,692 8/22/12 7:12 P
The cooking method doesn't really matter unless you're adding something to it; roasting won't provide an appreciable difference in nutrient content. When your'e cooking them in the crockpot, again, it doesn't change, unless you're cooking it in something; in which case, you're going to also count the thing you're cooking it in.
I just made a pot roast with red baby potatoes. I just entered red potatoes in my tracker, and counted te other ingredients separately. :)
Fitness Minutes: (120)
8/22/12 7:07 P
I was actually wondering this same thing earlier today. I'd guess they'd be about the same, as long as you're making sure the weights are correct.
8/22/12 6:42 P
In the nutrition tracker I can find baked potato with skin but I can't find when you cook potatoes any other way...like if you roast them in the oven I count the olive oil and then just call them baked potatoes even though they are roasted.
And when I cook them in the crock pot...I can't find potatoes cooked in the crock pot...so I just still call it a baked potato.
SparkPeople, SparkCoach, SparkPages, SparkPoints, SparkDiet, SparkAmerica, SparkRecipes, DailySpark, and other marks are trademarks of SparkPeople, Inc. All Rights Reserved. No portion of this website can be used without the permission of SparkPeople or its authorized affiliates.
SPARKPEOPLE is a registered trademark of SparkPeople, Inc. in the United States, European Union, Canada, and Australia. All rights reserved.