Author: Sorting Last Post on Top Message:
FREEFROMFOOD Posts: 552
10/5/13 4:44 P

COACHDENISE - thanks so much.

SP_COACH_DENISE Posts: 42,200
10/5/13 2:46 P

It does seem to be a little off and I'll pass it onto our tech team to look into when they have a chance.

Thanks!

Coach Denise

MOTIVATED@LAST Posts: 15,430
10/5/13 6:44 A

The fitness maps function does produce some pretty weird results.

The fitness tracker itself seems to produce more consistent results.

M@L

FREEFROMFOOD Posts: 552
10/5/13 5:15 A

Hi
no I double checked that. You check and see.
It just doesn't make sense to me.
(although frankly I wouldn't mind if it was better for me to walk slower lol)
thanks

SLIMMERKIWI SparkPoints: (241,172)
Fitness Minutes: (41,039)
Posts: 26,440
10/5/13 4:42 A

I am wondering if you have done what I sometimes do..... misread the km/hr and mph. That might account for it!

Kris

FREEFROMFOOD Posts: 552
10/4/13 8:12 P

I use SP fitness tracker to log my exercise. But the following issue confuses me:
Walking 15 minutes at 4km/hr burns 101 calories
Walking 15 minutes at 4.6km/hr burns 99 calories

Why does walking faster and further burn fewer calories? Shouldn't it be the other way around?

Can someone enlighten me please?

Page: 1 of (1)  




Other Fitness and Exercise Topics:

Topics: Last Post:
Trying to lose weight but gaining with ST 3/10/2016 5:04:34 PM
Recommendations please 3/15/2016 5:25:37 PM
"Simply Fit" exercise board 9/7/2016 9:28:59 AM
Richard Simmons Stretching 7/6/2016 6:44:10 PM
Knee rehab after injury - frequency question 3/5/2016 1:03:29 AM