Author: Sorting Last Post on Top Message:
EROSE1311 SparkPoints: (29,013)
Fitness Minutes: (31,878)
Posts: 219
6/18/13 4:52 P

I am talking about after cooking dry measure does not help. When I cook pasta, I cook a whole box. So dry measure does not work. I fix for a week or two and freeze single servings. I do not cook for just one meal. I do not waste time just for one or two servings at a time. Like I fix chicken breast for the whole week

Edited by: EROSE1311 at: 7/3/2013 (17:18)
BLUEBONNETT Posts: 22
2/2/13 3:16 P

I am so glad that I bought a digital scale. It IS the best investment I made for my diet. I weigh out all my foods, especially pasta. I am glad that I am now satisfied after eating 1 to 2 ounces rather than 8 to 10 ounces of pasta. I weigh before I cook so that I will not make the mistake of making too much and be tempted to eat it.

SPKRAUSE Posts: 543
2/1/13 12:42 P

Add a 'ditto' to YOJULEZ's comment. I use a scale now for most dry ingredients, including pasta. Instead ounces, though, I tend to shift to grams. My -- digital -- scale will measure fractions of ounces, down to the eighth, but does grams individually, and at about 28g per ounce, I have a *little* more room for fine-tuning with grams. This doesn't really matter with pasta, but it does in baking, for example.

Anyway:
[1] measuring by weight/mass will almost always be better with dry ingredients
[2] if you don't have a food scale, get one, as it's just about your best kitchen investment

YOJULEZ SparkPoints: (15,605)
Fitness Minutes: (120)
Posts: 2,171
2/1/13 12:20 P

I agree with Jen. Weighing is always the best method with pasta. You realize that the calorie information on the box is for UNCOOKED pasta, right? So 2oz of uncooked spaghetti is 200ish calories usually. This does not change after cooking unless you're adding oil to your water. Plus, certain pastas are bigger in volume than others, while some are smaller. A half cup of ditalini is going to be a lot different calorie wise than a half cup of penne.

Weighing is always best.

Edited by: YOJULEZ at: 2/1/2013 (12:21)
JENMC14 Posts: 2,707
2/1/13 9:38 A

Ounces is going to be more accurate than using a measuring cup. You may be getting more calories than you think.

BTUFTEE Posts: 1
1/31/13 12:23 P

I always measure it dry, before it goes into the cooking water. If I start out with 200 calories of dry pasta, I know I'm going to get 200 calories of cooked pasta out in the end, no matter what volume it has. This also works well if you're dividing up portions too - just measure the total weight of the cooked pasta and divide accordingly. I never found volume measurements to be accurate for anything as "chunky" as pasta or veggies - just liquids and dry powders.

EROSE1311 SparkPoints: (29,013)
Fitness Minutes: (31,878)
Posts: 219
1/29/13 3:37 P

I measure pasta by the cup not by th ounce you can get way too calories by the ounce. I use whole grain thin Spaghetti. I measure 1/2 cup of spaghetti that is I have alot of less calories.

Page: 1 of (1)  




Other Recipes & Cooking General Discussion Topics:

Topics: Last Post:
Turkey soup 12/3/2012 12:21:52 AM
Ninja 3 in 1 cooker - YOU HAVE TO GET ONE! 5/5/2013 6:56:00 PM
Does anyone know where Chef Meg is from? 8/30/2011 9:53:51 AM
sharing your favorite healthy recipes, 8/9/2011 7:43:29 AM
Romaine lettuce 12/30/2012 2:42:09 PM

Diet Resources: celebrity diet and workout | celebrity workout clothes | celebrity workout plan