It is just a guidline and not recomende to fit all people.
1/1/10 Start Wht 279 lbs 12/1/15 Goal 180
**Maintain** "OR" set new Goal! 170's maybe??
Fitness Minutes: (2,350)
4/2/12 3:45 A
just some good April Fool's Day fun. That aside, I definitely agree that the BMI should be adjusted...slightly. And it is true that sizes have changed. A woman's size "16" in the 60s is about a size "12" today, so I guess something like this wouldn't come as a huge shock, but it would throw a lot of things off, not just body weight. I'm curious about the phone number listed though. Anyone call it? Maybe I should, I was just thinking maybe it wouldn't work since it's the 2nd now.
"When people are ready to, they change. They never do it before then, and sometimes they die before they get around to it. You can't make them change if they don't want to, just like when they do want to, you can't stop them." - Andy Warhol
Fitness Minutes: (67,984)
4,160 4/2/12 3:27 A
And I thought NOBODY got me this April 1st -- what a fool! However, they have changed clothes numbers and bra numbers to fit the vanity of people, so why not the pounds??
We cannot win eternal joy by living on the surface. P. Tillich ++++++++++++++
Fitness Minutes: (226,480)
8,136 4/2/12 12:11 A
Online Now • ))
Janie Garcia Moreno
"WITH GOD ALL THINGS ARE POSSIBLE"
"PRAYER CHANGES THINGS"
"NEVER PUT A QUESTION MARK WHERE GOD HAS PUT A PERIOD!"
"WHAT THE MIND CAN CONCEIVE AND BELIEVE, IT CAN ACHIEVE!"
It was an April fools joke. The sad part is I believed it until I got to the end where it said that. The government is so good at word spinning I have no problem believing such stupidity.
Fitness Minutes: (27,992)
5,195 4/1/12 12:55 P
Sounds like a current government's ability to FIX things.
Change is good so get over it and move on
4/1/12 12:43 P
Ha ha! :D
Though if it were serious I don't think it would be all bad, especially for men. Penn and Teller did a great episode of their show Bullsh** about the topic. Health is what matters and there are skinny people who are unhealthy and many who fall in the overweight category who are actually very healthy, active and fit. Since insurance companies use BMI to avoid covering overweight people, I think it would be just fine to expand the range of healthy weight and include more biomarkers for overall health than just weight and height as well. (Such as blood pressure, resting pulse and blood lipids) . . . They wouldn't likely do it though, because doing that would mess with their normal bell curve, and that annoys statisticians to no end. Despite the research that contradicts the fear mongering of those in the overweight category. (And I speak only of the overweight, not the obese - once you get to obese, myself included, you really should try to lose weight and be supported with the resources to do so).
Fitness Minutes: (14,252)
9,689 4/1/12 11:51 A
Nichole... joke. ;) Happy April Fool's!
Heather Writer, mother, wife, and breadwinner. I love to run, but running doesn't love me, so I'm switching to my low-impact bike.
I agree and disagree with this, I think that BMI should be adjusted, my dad is in the military and stands at 6'5 250 lbs. While he might want to shed a few, he doesn't look morbidly obese and is very healthy. At the same time, I don't think that changing this will solve any problems. We are a society of over indulgence and need to adjust what we eat, the amount that we eat, and the example we are setting for our children!
SparkPeople, SparkCoach, SparkPages, SparkPoints, SparkDiet, SparkAmerica, SparkRecipes, DailySpark, and other marks are trademarks of SparkPeople, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
SPARKPEOPLE is a registered trademark of SparkPeople, Inc. in the United States, European Union, Canada, and Australia. All rights reserved.