Author: Sorting Last Post on Top Message:
ARACOS79 SparkPoints: (0)
Fitness Minutes: (1,823)
Posts: 189
9/10/10 4:04 P

I used to be an "all white meat" person, and not just for the nutritional reasons. But as I started doing more and more of my own cooking, I am a bigger fan of dark meat. Your biggest "enemy," as everyone else is mentioning, is the skin. Avoid that, and you're already ahead of the game. I used to only do boneless, skinless breasts. But lately I find cooking on the bone to impart better flavor, not sure of the nutritional impact of that though.

KLEVERKIRA Posts: 1,099
9/10/10 3:59 P

White meat might be slightly healthier, but I feel more satisifed with less dark meat because the flavor is richer.

Nashville, TN
BRITOMART Posts: 7,697
9/10/10 3:29 P

I eat both, always skinless, on the principle that variety is likely to be useful. On the PP who says arachidonic acid is bad...might want to do a bit more research! in moderation it's essential for animals (and we is animals) though too much, like too much of anything, is bad for a body, and one can get it from other foods than dark meat poultry.


Every moment is unique, unknown, completely fresh. ~~ Pema Chodron

* + * + * + *
If nothing changes...nothing changes.
CHINES706 Posts: 88
9/10/10 12:09 P

White mean is much healthier. Try it skinless with a little bit of hot sauce. Yummy!

Im doing this for the most important person. ME!

Goal #1: 190 lbs
Goal #2: 185 lbs (new shirt)
Goal #3: 180 lbs
Goal #4: 175 lbs (new outfit & hair cut)
Goal #5: 170 lbs (small family vacation)
SUEK24 Posts: 1,139
9/10/10 9:14 A

White meat is a much healthier choice because it contains less arachidonic acid (a "bad" fat) than dark.


Lost 100 pounds with the Zone 18 years ago and have kept it off!

You can see photos of my favorite meals and snacks here:

9/10/10 8:58 A

I'm not sure about nutrition wise (and seeing below I think the question was answered...) HOWEVER... I LOVE the dark meat! Give me skinless chicken legs any day!

FYI... when I was a kid my mom ALWAYS skinned the chicken (all parts) because my dad hated the look/feel/taste of skin. It wasn't until I was in my late 20's that I ever had a piece of chicken skin. It sort of creeped me out! emoticon LOL!

CHLOE453 Posts: 5,860
9/10/10 6:08 A

We eat whatever is on sale, I just make sure that I prepare it without fat.

CCBRAGA Posts: 329
9/10/10 2:24 A

Dark has more fat, but tastes better.

GRAPEMASTER SparkPoints: (0)
Fitness Minutes: (33,406)
Posts: 1,317
9/9/10 11:42 P


9/8/10 8:26 P

Avoid the skin always, but there's not a huuuge difference in white/dark...just track appropriately. Theoretically you could end up w/ more fat/cals adding gravy to white meat than just eating a little dark meat. Or try putting a little of each on your plate!

Starting Over!!

Mini Goal-5 servings fruit/veggies a day

Mini Goal-No junk food in the house-go out for ice cream or other treat if i crave something and make it an outing, not just eating

Maxi goal-Bikini bod May 2012!
J40IN7 Posts: 258
9/8/10 3:42 P

white meat is much better

less calories and a lot less fat.

and never eat the skin of the chicken

9/8/10 3:33 P

You save a few grams of fat and calories with white meat, but nutritionally they are similar. The choice is yours, but leave off the skin, and use only a little gravy if necessary.
Dietitian Becky

FANGLE Posts: 1,821
9/8/10 3:02 P

Dark meat is more fatty.

9/8/10 2:39 P

I have what may be a stupid question. Are there nutritional benefits to choosing white meat over dark meat? Is one healthier than the other?

Page: 1 of (1)  

Other Diet and Nutrition Topics:

Topics: Last Post:
"diet" test on the BBC 1/28/2015 12:35:47 AM
True weight chart 9/23/2014 4:12:57 PM
Allergies? 10/20/2014 10:45:58 AM
Seeking truth about facts and myths of Food 1/14/2015 8:28:16 PM
Adding Items to Nutirition Tracker 10/27/2014 11:05:40 AM