Fitness Minutes: (1,823)
189 9/10/10 4:04 P
I used to be an "all white meat" person, and not just for the nutritional reasons. But as I started doing more and more of my own cooking, I am a bigger fan of dark meat. Your biggest "enemy," as everyone else is mentioning, is the skin. Avoid that, and you're already ahead of the game. I used to only do boneless, skinless breasts. But lately I find cooking on the bone to impart better flavor, not sure of the nutritional impact of that though.
White meat might be slightly healthier, but I feel more satisifed with less dark meat because the flavor is richer.
9/10/10 3:29 P
I eat both, always skinless, on the principle that variety is likely to be useful. On the PP who says arachidonic acid is bad...might want to do a bit more research! in moderation it's essential for animals (and we is animals) though too much, like too much of anything, is bad for a body, and one can get it from other foods than dark meat poultry.
I'm not sure about nutrition wise (and seeing below I think the question was answered...) HOWEVER... I LOVE the dark meat! Give me skinless chicken legs any day!
FYI... when I was a kid my mom ALWAYS skinned the chicken (all parts) because my dad hated the look/feel/taste of skin. It wasn't until I was in my late 20's that I ever had a piece of chicken skin. It sort of creeped me out! LOL!
Avoid the skin always, but there's not a huuuge difference in white/dark...just track appropriately. Theoretically you could end up w/ more fat/cals adding gravy to white meat than just eating a little dark meat. Or try putting a little of each on your plate!
SparkPeople, SparkCoach, SparkPages, SparkPoints, SparkDiet, SparkAmerica, SparkRecipes, DailySpark, and other marks are trademarks of SparkPeople, Inc. All Rights Reserved. No portion of this website can be used without the permission of SparkPeople or its authorized affiliates.
SPARKPEOPLE is a registered trademark of SparkPeople, Inc. in the United States, European Union, Canada, and Australia. All rights reserved.