Fitness Minutes: (53,553)
715 10/27/13 2:32 P
Under the mileage, you can enter the time it took you to do the marathon and the distance (26.2 miles). It doesn't make sense that a person should only count a walk if their heart rate is in the aerobic zone. My heart rate never gets up to the aerobic zone when I walk, but it definitely goes up. I enter all of my walks as exercise. I don't go any slower than 3.5 mph an hour.
Edit: I looked at the link that you posted and I think that when it talks about not counting every activity counting as exercise, it means things like housework and gardening. I guess walking could be one of those things not to count if you are taking your child for a leisurely walk.
Edited by: FIELDWORKING at: 10/27/2013 (14:37)
Fitness Minutes: (57,989)
6,763 10/27/13 9:41 A
If you walked a marathon, of course you were exercising!!!! I know I do not get my heart into range all the time but if I am walking to get myself moving it is helping. No one mentioned the fact that some people may also be on medication that impacts their ability to get to maximum range. As others have said...We are walking and losing so something is working!
Fitness Minutes: (73,913)
3,213 10/25/13 6:05 P
That's interesting--and very contrary to everything else that I have ever read on Spark, where 10 minutes of exercise counts as a "workout."
I think that you should count it in your activity tracker, but know that you likely need to be doing more intense workouts as well if you actually want to be fit.
Check out the section "Not every movement or activity counts as exercise" It clearly states if you're not in the aerobic zone then it doesn't count as exercise. I'm pretty sure I never reach an aerobic zone while walking. Especially while walking 26.2 miles - gotta pace yourself, you know.
I've read numerous articles on SP over the last 2+ years that state walking should not be included on your fitness tracker since it's not aerobic. I always ignore them. I read one again on Monday but I'll be damned if I can find it. I think that if you look for exercise articles in SP you'll see what I'm talking about. I was just curious how people feel about it and I got a ton of responses. Thank you.
I was also wondering how I would track walking a marathon (I did this last spring) if I can't count walking as exercise. Do I just assume I burned 0 calories for that day? Even though I walked 26.2 miles? That's what the article I read on Monday implied. I find it frustrating.
I can't recall ever seeing a Spark article discouraging walking as exercise...but perhaps what they meant is that there is a certain amount of walking on a normal day (ie. walk to the car, go grocery shopping and walk around the store, walk up and down the stairs to carry laundry, etc.) that is already taken into account as your "activity level" when you sign up or reset your goals which they factor into your recommended calorie ranges for each day. If you take this normal daily walking and add it to your activity level AND fitness tracking - your calorie ranges may be off because you're in effect - double counting. Now being reasonable...if you are doing a lot of walking above and beyond your normal activity - obviously you're getting in exercise. One thing to keep in mind...depending on your fitness level - it may take different intensity of walking to be considered "cardio" exercise -when you're heart rate is elevated within a certain range. Adding intensity to walking is very easy by adding elevation, arm movements, weight, speed, etc.
Okay, here's my 2 cents. In all studies ever conducted, excess calories burned never equates to the "3500calories=1 pound" model. Likewise,excess calories consumed never equates to the model either (the people always gain less than 10 pounds of body fat. So, more and more, people are starting to realize that a calorie is NOT just a calorie. Now this is not to say that calories don't matter, they most definitely do. What I AM saying is that hormones matter as much if not more. Just as there is a hormonal response to each and every food we eat (some good, some bad, depending on the food), there is also a hormonal response to exercise. Movement is essential! It changes our chemical make up over time and helps balance hormones which influences your metabolism. Move! Move every change you can! And if tracking it as exercise is what motivates you to do more of it then, by all means, count it!
I would suggest getting a HRM. You don't have to power walk per se, but you can walk fast enough to keep your heart rate in the "fat burning range". I know if I'm just strolling around, my HRM doesn't even count it towards my weekly goals.
Here is an interesting article on running/walking and calories from Runner's World
Thanks everyone. I understand that BRISK walking is exercise. But, lets say I've decided to walk 3 MPH for 3+ hours. I know my heart rate isn't up but I'm still walking 9+ miles and therefore, should have burned about 900 calories. I'm trying to understand why that doesn't count as exercise and shouldn't be put on my fitness tracker Any insight??
Fitness Minutes: (5,577)
437 10/24/13 12:20 P
According to many experts, power or brisk walking can burn the same amount of calories as jogging or running. So it is useful for helping with weight loss. And, because it is low impact, it does not have the same potential for injury as jogging. Yet it can offer all the benefits.'
Walking also helps to drain the lower legs of excess fluid and can help prevent varicose veins through the pumping action of the calf muscles. 'The increased supply of oxygen also gets rid of the waste products in the tissues.
Also, because more people are able to walk at a more consistent speed than they can run, it is a more beneficial form of tissue-cleansing, particularly for those over fifty.
Walking is also better for the spine than running, because it puts less stress on the discs. We were designed for constant movement, not sitting in cars or in front of computers, which causes negative pressures on our spinal cord. So, there you go, experts believe walking 'is' great exercise.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article- 122898/Why-walking-workout-good-body.h tml#ixzz2iejze011 Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Fitness Minutes: (13,947)
2,072 10/24/13 12:20 P
I am walking a 15 minute mile now and I will be counting that as exercise, but I do not count the walking that I do when I walk to dog, go grocery shopping or stroll around the mall
Fitness Minutes: (105,662)
13,263 10/24/13 12:04 P
shopping-type walking, with numerous stops and starts, should not count as exercise.
Fitness Minutes: (35,001)
5,088 10/24/13 11:57 A
Here is how I see it: if my boyfriend and I go for a leisurely stroll around my neighborhood (something we do a lot of), it is not exercise. However, if I plan to walk briskly for X amount of miles where my heart rate is up, it is exercise.
I haven't read these articles, but maybe they're referring to leisurely strolls, shopping, things like that?
I've read several articles on SP that say walking is not exercise, it's an activity. It should not be counted on your fitness tracker since it most likely does not raise your heart rate into the aerobic range. I've also read that walking burns approximately 100 calories per mile. I walk an average of 5 miles per day and walked a marathon last spring. Am I really not supposed to claim that on my fitness tracker? 26.2 miles should burn about 2500 calories but it's not exercise? I'm confused!
SparkPeople, SparkCoach, SparkPages, SparkPoints, SparkDiet, SparkAmerica, SparkRecipes, DailySpark, and other marks are trademarks of SparkPeople, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
SPARKPEOPLE is a registered trademark of SparkPeople, Inc. in the United States, European Union, Canada, and Australia. All rights reserved.