Author: Sorting Last Post on Top Message:
AMANDANCES Posts: 2,006
7/23/13 3:00 P

This is old news. The important question to be asking is what is the GOAL of the activity.

Improvements in cardiovascular health can be accomplished by small bursts of activity. So 3 10-minute workouts will give you the same heart-strengthening benefits as one 30-minute session. However, three 10-minute segments won't do anything for your cardio-respiratory endurance or endurance training in general.

Tabata and HIIT raining is based on the idea that short bursts of extremely vigorous activity will give the same heart-strengthening benefits as a longer session of moderate activity. The scientific studies seem to bear this out. Again, it does nothing for endurance, and I don't think it's useful for increasing VO2 max, but I haven't investigate it fully, so I could be wrong.

"Fitness" is too general a term to use to describe anything. What a lot of articles address is general cardiovascular health, but don't address weight-loss, endurance, or strength gains.

Edited by: AMANDANCES at: 7/23/2013 (15:05)
On our way to Mordor.

Blogging our walking fitness journey here:
thereandbackagainforfitness.blogspot.com/
LEC358 SparkPoints: (10,691)
Fitness Minutes: (6,555)
Posts: 2,596
7/23/13 2:48 P

The results of this study don't really surprise me based on other research I've read. The only thought that comes to my head is that the 150 minutes of activity a week recommendation is just a motivator to get people to move - much in the same way the Red Cross has dropped the rescue breathing from CPR protocol. They want to lower the barrier of entry to helping someone.

WADINGMOOSE Posts: 1,044
7/23/13 2:47 P

I kind of had to laugh when I got to the end and they recommended a 30 minute high intensity workout - which is the duration people haven't been willing to do before (according to the article). But I suppose that increasing the intensity is great for those doing the workout. I just don't think that it'll increase general population buy-in for exercise.

SERGEANTMAJOR Posts: 6,458
7/23/13 12:31 P


This was published in my local newspaper today and adds to the debate over the duration of workouts. An interesting read if nothing else.

www.startribune.com/lifestyle/health/21647
3251.html



It is called WORK-ing out for a reason.

I said getting fit was simple, I did not say it was easy.

Cardio burns calories, strength work burns fat.

Eat well to lose weight, exercise to get fit

You can not build a six pack using twelve packs


Often when we seek a magic bullet for fitness we end up shooting ourselves in the foot.

"I think calories are little germs in food that all moms are afraid of" Dennis the Menace

Page: 1 of (1)  




Other Fitness and Exercise Topics:

Topics: Last Post:
BodPod 4/16/2014 4:58:43 PM
Weird question... ladies only! 4/21/2014 2:34:47 PM
Residual pain after charley horse 5/20/2014 9:38:16 AM
Suggestions just in case power goes out 2/12/2014 10:23:58 AM
burning calories 3/12/2014 11:16:32 AM