Advertisement -- Learn more about ads on this site.

 
Message Boards
FORUM:   Fitness and Exercise
TOPIC:  

TRACKING CALORIES BURNED WITH EXERCISE.



Click here to read our frequently asked Fitness and Exercise questions.

 
 
Search the
Message Boards:
Search
      Share
Advertisement -- Learn more about ads on this site.

Author: Message: Sort First Post on Top


JKW1957
Posts: 170
12/4/12 11:13 A

I agree HRM only way to go. Exercise machines that tell you how many calories you are burning usually are wrong.



KRISTEN_SAYS
SparkPoints: (73,366)
Fitness Minutes: (34,785)
Posts: 5,088
12/4/12 10:35 A

I would invest in a heart rate monitor to get a more accurate estimate. They're not too expensive - mine was about $60 on amazon.com, and it was worth every penny IMO



PAPAMIKIE
SparkPoints: (42,440)
Fitness Minutes: (89,725)
Posts: 3,892
12/4/12 4:17 A

I am a runner and used a heart rate monitor and also six other estatmite to estimate my calorie burn. These were all within about 10 to 15%. The estimate of errors in the estimates is typically larger than this difference, that suggests that statistically there is no difference or very little difference.

Outside of a lab there is not way to get a very accurate estimate of calories burned. In my heart rate forumal I included a personal factor that allowed you to adjust the estimate. I decreased my estimate by 10% and had a friend who increased herss by 10%. We each did this to reflect what we experienced in the real world (that is weight loss, etc)

Edited Dec 4 2012.

I thought I would be more explicit that In my opinion a heart rate monitor is not really much better than all the rest. In fact, my friend and I adjusted the results from heart rate monitor caclulations by 20% (me down 10% and her up 10%) to make a reliable match between the estimates of the heart rate monitor and the real world results. So yes, heart rate monitors are slightly better and are in fact the best we can do outside a lab, however they are still not much more than a ball park 10-20%. 100 calories reported by a heart rate monitor should be considered somewhere between 90 and 110 calories at best.

So even the heart rate monitor is only a guestimate.

Edited by: PAPAMIKIE at: 12/4/2012 (10:47)


JENMC14
Posts: 2,707
12/3/12 3:35 P

You can't know. The most likely to be closest to accurate is the one that uses your height and weight in figuring out the burn. Personally, in order to keep from overestimating, I'd go with the lower, or enter the middle ground manually. You might try another site and see which it is closer to as well. I like caloriesperhour.com. If you don't use a HRM, any internet tool is just a guesstimate.



TOBYBEAR54
SparkPoints: (2,283)
Fitness Minutes: (703)
Posts: 103
12/3/12 3:18 P

How do you find out which calories burned is right? I used Free Tool that shows calories website and they are different from SparkPeople. How do you know which to use?



 
Page: 1 of (1)  
Search  



Share


 
Diet Resources: crayfish benefits | crayfish diet | crayfish health
x Lose 10 Pounds by October 30! Get a FREE Personalized Plan