I generally don't eat my exercise calories...if I have an event and am going to drink I think its kind of a cushion for it. :)
Fitness Minutes: (11,602)
723 8/1/13 10:32 A
WW did that. You would earn so many fitness "points" and then could eat back those points. I found I gained when I did that. I could never understand if you exercised and burned x amount of calories why in the world would you want to eat those back? Seems to go against everything we're trying to accomplish!
Fitness Minutes: (129,002)
7/31/13 5:53 P
I don't eat the calories back and have consistently lost 2 pounds per week. I have worked out for 30 days in a row. I stick to about 1200- 1500 calories per day. After my workouts it says I can increase that number to 1800-2000. I haven't done it yet. I'm afraid to eat that many calories, but that is just me.
Fitness Minutes: (2,064)
7/31/13 3:52 P
Okay thanks! I know when MFP said to eat back the calories, I did and ended up gaining weight so I will try not eating back the calories and see how that goes. Thanks everyone!
Yep. It's the big reason I don't like the new tracker - they spent years teaching planned exercise and that it was a way to a healthy lifestyle and eating enough regularly was a way to fuel yourself, that eating back all your exercise calories and thinking day-to-day was probably not going to get you far. Then they switch it to "you burned 300 calories today, you can eat 300 more calories today".
I eat more or less at maintenance and exercise is pretty much the only deficit I get, so in that scenario eating back those calories won't work.
Fitness Minutes: (15,360)
9,707 7/31/13 1:33 P
Sparkpeople recently added the "exercise = more calories" option to the nutrition tracker. I personally don't like it; I plan my exercise, I do my exercise, and I eat my calories over the course of the week. The advice you're seeing from Coaches is likely before this feature was implemented less than a month ago.
Your mileage may vary.
Edited by: DRAGONCHILDE at: 7/31/2013 (13:33)
Fitness Minutes: (2,064)
7/31/13 1:11 P
Hey everyone, So I came over here from My Fitness Pal, and there was a lot of debate about eating or not eating the exercise calories. There seems to be a lot of debate here as well, and I am a bit confused as to what I should do. I have the tracker that shows the food intake minus fitness burned to reach a total calorie deficit. However under the nutrition tracker it says "You burned 534 calories today, you can eat more!" (or something along those lines) So I click it and it says that my calorie range does not take into account if you've exercised for that day. It assumes you have not exercised. Yet I have seen comments on similar posts from Spark Coaches that say to not eat the calories back because the calorie range given to you *was* taking into consideration the calories burnt.
So...which is correct? Anyone care to take a stab at this? HAHA!
SparkPeople, SparkCoach, SparkPages, SparkPoints, SparkDiet, SparkAmerica, SparkRecipes, DailySpark, and other marks are trademarks of SparkPeople, Inc. All Rights Reserved. No portion of this website can be used without the permission of SparkPeople or its authorized affiliates.
SPARKPEOPLE is a registered trademark of SparkPeople, Inc. in the United States, European Union, Canada, and Australia. All rights reserved.