Author: Sorting Last Post on Top Message:
LESSALLOVER1 SparkPoints: (63,654)
Fitness Minutes: (906)
Posts: 8,378
12/25/13 8:46 P

Thank you for the information. The more I know & understand, the better it will
be for me.

SERGEANTMAJOR Posts: 6,432
12/25/13 12:00 P

Both are exclusively cardio machines and will do little or nothing to build strength and increase musculature. Cardio is a component of a fitness programme however it is not the best one to use for fat loss since it will burn muscle as well as fat if used exclusively. The differences between the two machines are more in the mechanics of the action and not the benefit of one over the other as a cardio workout.

MLAN613 SparkPoints: (175,224)
Fitness Minutes: (167,648)
Posts: 11,303
12/25/13 9:12 A

Both are bikes and lower impact than, say, running. But, they are a little different and work your body a little differently. I personally feels it works my quads harder than an upright stationary bike. But, I feel the upright burns more calories. I guess I would exclusively use one over the other and perhaps utilize both if you have that option. After all, your body adapts to doing the same exact thing all the time.

Edited by: MLAN613 at: 12/25/2013 (09:14)
LESSALLOVER1 SparkPoints: (63,654)
Fitness Minutes: (906)
Posts: 8,378
12/25/13 9:05 A

Does riding a recumbant stationary bicycle have the same advantages as riding a
standard stationary bicycle?

Page: 1 of (1)  




Other Fitness and Exercise Topics:

Topics: Last Post:
Nike Fuel, Fitbit or Jawbone? 2/21/2014 8:43:19 AM
HOW MANY LB. DUMBELL'S DO YOU USE ?? 11/3/2013 9:32:30 PM
Exercise after back surgery 2/11/2014 11:45:17 AM
Insanity Day 16 Pic Results 10/24/2013 12:00:55 AM
would yoga bea good choice for me? 11/21/2013 9:33:50 PM

Diet Resources: collagen type i | collagen lotion | collagen for skin