Author: Sorting Last Post on Top Message:
LESSALLOVER1 SparkPoints: (83,205)
Fitness Minutes: (912)
Posts: 12,463
12/25/13 8:46 P

Thank you for the information. The more I know & understand, the better it will
be for me.

SERGEANTMAJOR Posts: 6,556
12/25/13 12:00 P

Both are exclusively cardio machines and will do little or nothing to build strength and increase musculature. Cardio is a component of a fitness programme however it is not the best one to use for fat loss since it will burn muscle as well as fat if used exclusively. The differences between the two machines are more in the mechanics of the action and not the benefit of one over the other as a cardio workout.

MLAN613 Posts: 16,966
12/25/13 9:12 A

Both are bikes and lower impact than, say, running. But, they are a little different and work your body a little differently. I personally feels it works my quads harder than an upright stationary bike. But, I feel the upright burns more calories. I guess I would exclusively use one over the other and perhaps utilize both if you have that option. After all, your body adapts to doing the same exact thing all the time.

Edited by: MLAN613 at: 12/25/2013 (09:14)
LESSALLOVER1 SparkPoints: (83,205)
Fitness Minutes: (912)
Posts: 12,463
12/25/13 9:05 A

Does riding a recumbant stationary bicycle have the same advantages as riding a
standard stationary bicycle?

Page: 1 of (1)  




Other Fitness and Exercise Topics:

Topics: Last Post:
Estimate calories burned - low intensity dumbbells 1/11/2016 6:15:43 PM
Need Info and Tips on exercising and diet with my 7/5/2016 2:29:19 PM
Add Me To Your Fitbit 11/16/2015 10:44:38 AM
Results 3/30/2016 11:38:08 PM
Comparing fitbit data to sparkpeople exercise 5/21/2016 9:47:53 PM