Advertisement -- Learn more about ads on this site.

 
Message Boards
FORUM:   SparkPeople Cafe
TOPIC:  

Is irregardless used correctly?



 
 
Search the
Message Boards:
Search
      Share
Advertisement -- Learn more about ads on this site.

Author: Message: Sort First Post on Top


DWROBERGE
SparkPoints: (312,235)
Fitness Minutes: (292,657)
Posts: 56,863
11/1/12 7:06 P

no such word



LEANANDFREEAT23
SparkPoints: (10,650)
Fitness Minutes: (9,080)
Posts: 79
11/1/12 6:02 P

I've had the "correction" conversation before ... it's definitely not worth it. I'm, at least, glad to know there are some sensible people out there who agree with me that the word is ridiculous.





KACEYSW
Posts: 1,986
11/1/12 4:10 P

That is one of the words that makes my Grammar Grinch cringe. Regardless of its intended use, irregardless is incorrect.



ANARIE
Posts: 12,325
11/1/12 4:00 P

It's nonstandard, but don't waste your energy telling him so. Telling someone that they use nonstandard English is kind of like telling them that they need to change their diet-- they already know and tend to turn hostile if you remind them. Irregardless is one of those things that's probably someday going to be considered "part of the common usage," like "tuna fish" and "ATM machine." Those are both redundant in the same way, but grammarians have given up on them.

(By the way, my spell check didn't flag "irregardless!")



LEANANDFREEAT23
SparkPoints: (10,650)
Fitness Minutes: (9,080)
Posts: 79
11/1/12 2:51 P

@OBIESMOM2


Oh my goodness, those are hilarious!



OBIESMOM2
SparkPoints: (61,086)
Fitness Minutes: (40,069)
Posts: 4,472
11/1/12 2:41 P

@Lean & Free - maybe your coworker could enter next year's lit contest
www.bulwer-lytton.com/2012win.html

these always crack me up



RICCILYNN
Posts: 2,452
11/1/12 2:34 P

it is believed to be a combination of regardless and irrespective and I think it is more of a redundancy than a double negative. It is definitely overkill and regardless is usually preferred.



RIET69
SparkPoints: (47,025)
Fitness Minutes: (11,285)
Posts: 3,116
11/1/12 2:24 P

It's often used incorrectly. regardless is enough.



KJFITNESSDUDE
Posts: 15,780
11/1/12 11:49 A

@OBIESMOM: ROFLMFAO!!!!!
emoticon



OBIESMOM2
SparkPoints: (61,086)
Fitness Minutes: (40,069)
Posts: 4,472
11/1/12 11:43 A

I like the Urban Dictionary definition: A word used by uneducated people intending to sound intelligent. (That's been my personal experience)

although Merriam-Webster says the word has been around since 1927, and just isn't widely accepted.

I agree with you; it sounds like a double negative.

Edited by: OBIESMOM2 at: 11/1/2012 (11:45)


RIOBAY
Posts: 213
11/1/12 11:37 A

I agree that it's a double negative, drives me crazy when people say it!



LEANANDFREEAT23
SparkPoints: (10,650)
Fitness Minutes: (9,080)
Posts: 79
11/1/12 11:24 A

There is a guy at my work who sits near me and I've heard him talking the last few days and he always uses the word irregardless where I would just use the word regardless.

I haven't been able to find a definitive answer that it is or is not a usable English term but I've always felt like it's a double negative. What do you think?



 
Page: 1 of (1)  
Search  



Share


 
Diet Resources: collard greens vs kale | collard greens zinc | eggplant extract