Author: Sorting Last Post on Top Message:
DWROBERGE SparkPoints: (333,345)
Fitness Minutes: (305,767)
Posts: 75,453
11/1/12 7:06 P

no such word

LEANANDFREEAT23 SparkPoints: (10,650)
Fitness Minutes: (9,080)
Posts: 79
11/1/12 6:02 P

I've had the "correction" conversation before ... it's definitely not worth it. I'm, at least, glad to know there are some sensible people out there who agree with me that the word is ridiculous.



KACEYSW Posts: 2,488
11/1/12 4:10 P

That is one of the words that makes my Grammar Grinch cringe. Regardless of its intended use, irregardless is incorrect.

ANARIE Posts: 12,436
11/1/12 4:00 P

It's nonstandard, but don't waste your energy telling him so. Telling someone that they use nonstandard English is kind of like telling them that they need to change their diet-- they already know and tend to turn hostile if you remind them. Irregardless is one of those things that's probably someday going to be considered "part of the common usage," like "tuna fish" and "ATM machine." Those are both redundant in the same way, but grammarians have given up on them.

(By the way, my spell check didn't flag "irregardless!")

LEANANDFREEAT23 SparkPoints: (10,650)
Fitness Minutes: (9,080)
Posts: 79
11/1/12 2:51 P

@OBIESMOM2


Oh my goodness, those are hilarious!

OBIESMOM2 SparkPoints: (61,493)
Fitness Minutes: (40,069)
Posts: 4,472
11/1/12 2:41 P

@Lean & Free - maybe your coworker could enter next year's lit contest
www.bulwer-lytton.com/2012win.html

these always crack me up

RICCILYNN Posts: 2,452
11/1/12 2:34 P

it is believed to be a combination of regardless and irrespective and I think it is more of a redundancy than a double negative. It is definitely overkill and regardless is usually preferred.

RIET69 SparkPoints: (47,087)
Fitness Minutes: (11,285)
Posts: 3,116
11/1/12 2:24 P

It's often used incorrectly. regardless is enough.

KJFITNESSDUDE Posts: 15,787
11/1/12 11:49 A

@OBIESMOM: ROFLMFAO!!!!!
emoticon

OBIESMOM2 SparkPoints: (61,493)
Fitness Minutes: (40,069)
Posts: 4,472
11/1/12 11:43 A

I like the Urban Dictionary definition: A word used by uneducated people intending to sound intelligent. (That's been my personal experience)

although Merriam-Webster says the word has been around since 1927, and just isn't widely accepted.

I agree with you; it sounds like a double negative.

Edited by: OBIESMOM2 at: 11/1/2012 (11:45)
RIOBAY Posts: 213
11/1/12 11:37 A

I agree that it's a double negative, drives me crazy when people say it!

LEANANDFREEAT23 SparkPoints: (10,650)
Fitness Minutes: (9,080)
Posts: 79
11/1/12 11:24 A

There is a guy at my work who sits near me and I've heard him talking the last few days and he always uses the word irregardless where I would just use the word regardless.

I haven't been able to find a definitive answer that it is or is not a usable English term but I've always felt like it's a double negative. What do you think?

Page: 1 of (1)  




Other SparkPeople Cafe Topics:

Topics: Last Post:
Remember when you actually DID start to lose wgt? 8/17/2013 12:47:53 PM
Does The Biggest Loser make you feel... 8/7/2013 5:42:14 PM
Earned my next Trophy! 8/7/2013 10:21:14 AM
Tracking OCD not good 9/28/2013 4:35:04 AM
BMI obese? 10/7/2013 3:17:36 PM

Diet Resources: collard greens vs kale | collard greens zinc | eggplant extract