I second that if you want accurate, and especially during workouts - you gotta get a heart rate monitor with a chest strap. A lot of those fitbits/nikebands/jawbones are essentially glorified pedometers, and all they know is that you're moving - not how fast or how much energy you're using or anything else. I just got a Polar heart rate monitor (the FT7), and have found that SP was underestimating my calorie burn by about 700 calories per week - it was hugely motivating to see that a run where I really exerted myself wasn't 220 calories - it was 420!
It won't count your all day calories - but to be fair just about nothing will without plugging in estimates. You could just as easily make that estimate for much cheaper.
Do something everyday that your future self will thank you for.
Fitness Minutes: (14,252)
9,692 6/5/13 10:51 A
If you want accuracy, a true heart rate monitor is going to give you the best estimate of your workouts. It doesn't help with day-to-day burn, but that's a figure you can generally figure out yourself with a little math. :)
Heather Writer, mother, wife, and breadwinner. I love to run, but running doesn't love me, so I'm switching to my low-impact bike.
Fitness Minutes: (280)
16 6/5/13 9:46 A
Time to by another tracker. Nothing that clips on you because i dont want to lose it. Just like i lost my fitbit.. So i guess one that needs to be worn on your wrist. That counts calories burned accurately.. Any Suggestions? Counting calories all day is a plus, but the most important thing is calories burned during workouts..
SparkPeople, SparkCoach, SparkPages, SparkPoints, SparkDiet, SparkAmerica, SparkRecipes, DailySpark, and other marks are trademarks of SparkPeople, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
SPARKPEOPLE is a registered trademark of SparkPeople, Inc. in the United States, European Union, Canada, and Australia. All rights reserved.