A very rough rule of thumb is that you burn about 100 calories per mile walked (slightly more for heavier people, slightly less for lighter people). If you walked 1 mile or so, then the 140 is more likely to be right. If it was 2 miles, 240 is more likely to be right.
Spark doesn't take vertical gain into account, but it would take a gain of several hundred vertical feet to burn 240 calories in 1 mile plus.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
The app was something like runkeeper and takes weight, height and also did gps
Fitness Minutes: (84,828)
3,412 3/24/13 9:42 P
950 more or less
Gratitude unlocks the fullness of life. It turns what we have into enough, and more. It turns denial into acceptance, chaos to order, confusion to clarity. It can turn a meal into a feast, a house into a home, a stranger into a friend.
Fitness Minutes: (14,252)
9,692 3/24/13 9:16 P
Couple of questions. What was the app, and what input does it accept? (Weight, heigh, gender, GPS, etc?)
How far did you walk? How much do you weight? (It's relevant, the more you weigh, the more you will burn.)
Heather Writer, mother, wife, and breadwinner. I love to run, but running doesn't love me, so I'm switching to my low-impact bike.
I'm using an app that tracks my distance, elevation and weight during a walk and that showed as an example that I burned 240 calories for my walk this morning. I put the same information on SparkPeople (no elevation) and it said 140 calories burned instead. How do I know what is accurate?
SparkPeople, SparkCoach, SparkPages, SparkPoints, SparkDiet, SparkAmerica, SparkRecipes, DailySpark, and other marks are trademarks of SparkPeople, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
SPARKPEOPLE is a registered trademark of SparkPeople, Inc. in the United States, European Union, Canada, and Australia. All rights reserved.