Author: Sorting Last Post on Top Message:
MISS_AJA SparkPoints: (1,854)
Fitness Minutes: (1,530)
Posts: 9
7/15/13 10:59 P

That makes sense, Thanks everyone! emoticon

WHOLENEWME79 Posts: 940
7/15/13 10:42 P

I use a heart rate monitor which, short of calculating calories burned in an actual lab, is the most accurate way to count them, even though it is still just an estimate. My calories on the HRM is normally closer to what spark says than what machine says. When I was 247, the machine was different than the HRM & spark by over 100 calories.

So, go with the lowest estimate. If you really want to be as accurate as possoble, the best thing is a HRM.

ZORBS13 SparkPoints: (103,458)
Fitness Minutes: (103,710)
Posts: 13,205
7/15/13 5:25 P

they're all estimates. But machines are notorious for overinflating the number. Choose the lowest one.

MISS_AJA SparkPoints: (1,854)
Fitness Minutes: (1,530)
Posts: 9
7/15/13 5:10 P

I'm a little confused on how much calories I actually burned, when I record the activity on this site. Everyday I use the elliptical for about 33 mins, and according to the machine it says I burned 424 calories (also due to some of the high intensity). However every time when I record it on this site, it keeps telling me I burned 348 calories, and I believe I can't find some way to change it. So which is actually truthful, the machine or this site?

Page: 1 of (1)  




Other Fitness and Exercise Topics:

Topics: Last Post:
Lesslie Sansone exercie videos... 9/28/2013 2:31:14 PM
FitBit - Feedback or Reviews 8/8/2013 4:26:46 AM
Stair climber vs arc trainer? 10/19/2013 12:30:49 PM
Kettlebell Calorie Burn and Urban Rebounding 11/18/2013 6:59:16 PM
Back of thighs hurt a lot when I sit and stretch 10/31/2013 7:57:04 AM

Diet Resources: organic freeze dried vegetables | freeze dried vegetables nutrition | creatine