Author: Sorting Last Post on Top Message:
 JOY-AND-CLARITY Posts: 36 1/2/13 2:27 P Thank you very much for your input, both! It's a mystery to me why it says 116 calories, then. I can't say I 'barely did something' - I was sweating and out of breath, all right! Edited by: JOY-AND-CLARITY at: 1/2/2013 (14:28)
 UNIDENT Posts: 33,498 1/2/13 1:35 P Most exercise burns 6-10 cals per minute. Bike riding is low impact, low intensity, and only uses half your body really (the upper body only stabilises). So it's very low-calorie burn compared to other exercises. This would suggest it's more the 6cpm range than 10cpm. So for 35 minutes, you would expect to see maybe 210-280. This suggests the 307 value to be the most likely reliable one. 116 is 3.3cpm (ha ha, barely "doing nothing" let alone "exercise") and 426 is 12.2cpm (much more a high intensity activity like running - extremely unlikely on a bike).
 BUBBLEJ1 Posts: 2,981 1/2/13 5:26 A All calculators use different algorithms to work out your calories burned. The only way to know for sure is to wear a heart rate monitor, and even that isn't perfect. The usual recommendation is to go somewhere in the middle, so if I were you I would add the 3 together and divide them by 3 to get the average, which is 283.
 JOY-AND-CLARITY Posts: 36 1/2/13 5:08 A Rode my bicycle today for 35 minutes. At about 19 km / hour. I filled it in to the Fitness tracker, it says I burned 116 calories. That seems little to me. I used another online list, it says I burned 307. Found another calculator, this one asked about the area, which is hillside. It says I burned 426. I don't understand this??? Edited by: JOY-AND-CLARITY at: 1/2/2013 (05:09)
Page: 1 of (1)

Other Fitness and Exercise Topics:

 Topics: Last Post: Exercises for stabalizer muscles 5/10/2015 10:33:04 AM non-weight bearing cardio? 11/22/2015 9:51:30 PM question about intense workouts 4/20/2015 10:28:16 AM Sleep..... 8 too many? 10/28/2015 11:54:59 AM Best pedometer app 5/13/2015 11:10:45 AM