hey do you think 5'7" and 140 pounds is fat? im 14 btw.
COACH-NICOLE 2/4/08 8:36 A
This link should help explain the different in calorie estimates online and on machines: http://teens.sparkpeople.com/community/ask_the_experts.asp?q=57
Nicole
HAGEN5690 2/2/08 11:56 P
we did those heart rate monitors in aerobics and strength training on friday we excersised for 20 minutes my watch told me i did it for 2!!! and i only burned 33 kcals...i burn almost 3,000 kcals for my resting metabolic rate!!! so that heart rate monitor was OFF!!!!
FEATHERA 2/2/08 10:27 P
If you are really concerned about the calories, you should invest in a heart rate monitor. I was thinking of buying one myself, because I do like to know what's going on in my body. :)
GREENTEAFIREFLY 2/2/08 1:15 P
Don't worry too much about calories burned. It's all just math, anyways. The important thing is getting in 20-30 minutes of exercise. As long as you're doing that you're right on track.
Other then that, I would estimate its really just between those two numbers. Machines are sometimes way off and sparkteens is probabaly more accurate, but also could be slightly too much? maybe? it does take in account your weight and height so maybe your just burning more then you think! :)
WANNABIKINI13 2/2/08 2:26 A
trust the machine cuz u had to put ur weight in so it can tell better also sparkteens is not specific about cals.
09SHANNON 2/1/08 7:34 P
ok so yesterday i was running on a treadmill for 40 min & the treadmill said that i burned 450 but then i added it into the sparkteens cardio adder thingy it it said i burned like 750 calories and i added the rite amount of miles per hour, so which one was rite?
